scholarly journals Web-based screening and brief motivational intervention reduces alcohol use in heavy-drinking undergraduates at up to 6 months

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. P. Hustad ◽  
B. Borsari
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 732-742
Author(s):  
Justin Walthers ◽  
Tim Janssen ◽  
Nadine R. Mastroleo ◽  
Ariel Hoadley ◽  
Nancy P. Barnett ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 2361-2372
Author(s):  
Craig A. Field ◽  
Dylan K. Richards ◽  
Yessenia Castro ◽  
José Alonso Cabriales ◽  
Amy Wagler ◽  
...  

Addiction ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
pp. 1014-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Marsden ◽  
Garry Stillwell ◽  
Helen Barlow ◽  
Annabel Boys ◽  
Colin Taylor ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 663-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate B. Carey ◽  
James M. Henson ◽  
Michael P. Carey ◽  
Stephen A. Maisto

2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Romo ◽  
Yann Le Strat ◽  
Caroline Aubry ◽  
Sonia Marquez ◽  
Karine Houdeyer ◽  
...  

Objectives: Brief interventions are effective in reducing heavy drinking in the general population but few studies examined whether it is also effective in alcohol dependent patients, and whether brief intervention increases self-efficacy. Method: One hundred and seven patients with alcohol-dependence were randomized in a controlled trial examining the efficacy of a brief motivational intervention on both self-efficacy level and days of abstinence. Results: We found that brief motivational interventions had no effect on days of abstinence, nor on self-efficacy, but that high self-efficacy was consistently correlated with a longer period of abstinence, at all assessment-points. Conclusion: Self-efficacy appears to be a crucial prognosis factor, and is not influenced by brief motivational interventions. Other types of specific psychotherapy, probably more intensive, may be more efficient in alcohol-dependent patients than motivational interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document