055 Effect of common concomitant antiepileptic drugs during adjunctive treatment with perampanel: post hoc analysis from the open-label extension of a phase III study in patients with idiopathic generalised epilepsy

2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. A23.1-A23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence J O’Brien ◽  
Francesco Bibbiani ◽  
Anna Patten ◽  
Antonio Laurenza ◽  
Betsy Williams
Keyword(s):  
Valproic Acid ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
Adjunctive Treatment ◽  
Partial Seizures ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Idiopathic Generalised Epilepsy ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Post Hoc

IntroductionPerampanel is approved for adjunctive treatment of partial seizures, with or without secondarily generalised seizures, and primary generalised tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures in epilepsy patients aged ≥12 years. Perampanel is also approved for monotherapy use for partial seizures in the US. This post hoc analysis assessed the effects of the most common concomitant Baseline antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on discontinuation rates and treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidence during adjunctive treatment with perampanel in patients (aged ≥12 years) with idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE) and PGTC seizures in the open-label extension (OLEx) Phase of Study 332 (NCT02307578).MethodsPatients completing the double-blind study could receive perampanel (≤12 mg/day) during the OLEx (6 week blinded Conversion Period;≤136 weeks’ Maintenance). Here, we report results for perampanel >4–8 mg/day and >8–12 mg/day.ResultsMost common concomitant Baseline AEDs were valproic acid (n=55), lamotrigine (n=53), levetiracetam (n=37), topiramate (n=21) and zonisamide (n=12); patients may have received >1 of these Baseline AEDs. The most common reasons for discontinuing were adverse event(s) (AE), ‘other’ and patient choice. Lamotrigine: patient choice, n=6/34 (>4–8 mg/day); AE/‘other’, both n=3/19 (>8–12 mg/day). Levetiracetam: patient choice, n=5/27 (>4–8 mg/day); AE, n=2/10 (>8–12 mg/day). Topiramate: ‘other’, n=3/15 (>4–8 mg/day); AE/‘other’, both n=1/6 (>8–12 mg/day). Valproic acid: patient choice, n=6/38 (>4–8 mg/day); ‘other’, n=4/17 (>8–12 mg/day). Zonisamide: patient choice/‘other’, both n=2/10 (>4–8 mg/day); no discontinuations (>8–12 mg/day). Patient-reported TEAEs ranged from: 88.2% (lamotrigine) to 93.3% (topiramate) for perampanel >4–8 mg/day, and 70.6% (valproic acid) to 100.0% (topiramate and zonisamide) for perampanel >8–12 mg/day. The most common TEAE was dizziness.ConclusionIn this post hoc analysis, primary reasons for discontinuation and TEAE incidence differed between the most common Baseline AED subgroups and perampanel dose range, although TEAE types were similar. These data provide additional information on the safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with IGE.Study supportEisai Inc.

scholarly journals 14 Long-term Efficacy of Brexpiprazole in Patients with Schizophrenia with Clinically Relevant Levels of Negative Symptoms

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
Catherine Weiss ◽  
Peter Zhang ◽  
Ross A Baker ◽  
Mary Hobart ◽  
Nanco Hefting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Symptoms ◽  
Extension Study ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Term Study ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Long Term Study ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Post Hoc

AbstractBackgroundEffective treatments for patients with high levels of negative symptoms of schizophrenia are lacking. Brexpiprazole is a serotonin–dopamine activity modulator that is a partial agonist at 5-HT1A and dopamine D2 receptors, and an antagonist at 5-HT2A and noradrenaline alpha1B/2C receptors, all with subnanomolar potency. Long-term treatment with brexpiprazole demonstrated broad efficacy across all five Marder factor groupings, including positive, negative, disorganized thoughts, uncontrolled hostility/excitement, and anxiety/depression. This post-hoc analysis of long-term effects of brexpiprazole in patients with clinically relevant levels of negative symptoms of schizophrenia is based on data from two similarly designed short-term, placebo-controlled studies (Vector; NCT01396421 or Beacon; NCT01393613) for the brexpiprazole-treated patients who continued into an open-label extension study (Zenith; NCT01397786).MethodsIn the short-term studies, patients with acute schizophrenia were randomly assigned to fixed once-daily doses of brexpiprazole 0.25mg (Vector), 1mg (Beacon), 2mg , 4mg or placebo for 6weeks. The long-term study was an open-label, 52-week (amended to 26weeks), safety extension study with flexible-dose (1–4mg/day) brexpiprazole. The post-hoc analyses were performed on brexpiprazole-treated patients from the short-term studies who continued into the long-term study, and who had clinically relevant negative symptoms, defined as PANSS Factor Score for Negative Symptoms (PANSS-FSNS; N1, N2, N3, N4, G7, G16) of ≥24, and score of ≥4 on at least two of three core negative symptom PANSS items at randomization in the parent study. The outcome of the analysis included change from baseline to up to 58weeks in PANSS-FSNS, PANSS Total, and PSP. Safety was also assessed.ResultsA total of 187 patients with clinically relevant levels of negative symptoms in the parent study rolled-over into the open-label extension study and were available for analysis. Eighty-three of these patients remained in the studies for 58weeks. Due to the study amendment, not all patients had the opportunity of complete 52weeks of open-label treatment. Baseline PANSS Total score was 104.4, while baseline PANSS-FSNS was 27.6 and baseline PSP Total score was 41.3. Mean change (SD) from baseline in PANSS-FSNS was –10.9 (5.0), and –44.2 (17.5) for PANSS Total score at Week 58. Change from baseline (SD) to Week 58 for PSP Total score was 24.8 (12.9) with improvement in all domains (socially useful activities, personal and social relationship, self-care, and disturbing and aggressive behaviors). The TEAEs reported ≥5% were schizophrenia (18.9%), insomnia (8.6%), weight increased (5.9%) and akathisia (5.9%).ConclusionThis post-hoc analysis suggests that brexpiprazole has long-term effectiveness on negative symptoms and functioning in patients with schizophrenia and clinically relevant levels of negative symptoms.Funding Acknowledgements: The study was funded by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc. and H. Lundbeck A/S

056 Perampanel and secondarily generalised seizures in a pooled analysis of phase III studies and their open-label extension: effect of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs

2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. A23.2-A23
Author(s):  
David Ko ◽  
Betsy Williams ◽  
Anna Patten ◽  
Antonio Laurenza
Keyword(s):  
Antiepileptic Drugs ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Adjunctive Treatment ◽  
Seizure Freedom ◽  
Partial Seizures ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Phase Iii Studies

IntroductionPerampanel is approved for adjunctive treatment of partial seizures, with or without secondarily generalised seizures (SGS), and primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures in epilepsy patients aged ≥12 years. Approval of perampanel for partial seizures was based on three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III Studies 304 (NCT00699972), 305 (NCT00699582) and 306 (NCT00700310); patients completing these could enter open-label extension (OLEx) Study 307 (NCT00735397). Here, we report efficacy of perampanel as adjunctive treatment of SGS by co-administration of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) versus non-EIAEDs in both the Phase III and OLEx studies.MethodsIn the double-blind studies, patients (≥12 years) with partial seizures, with or without SGS, receiving 1–3 AEDs at Baseline were randomised to placebo or 2–12 mg/day perampanel for 19 weeks. In the OLEx, patients received ≤12 mg/day perampanel for ≤272 weeks. Efficacy assessments included median percent change in SGS frequency/28 days, SGS 50% and 75% responder and seizure-freedom rates.ResultsFor patients with SGS at pre-perampanel Baseline, 564 were in the double-blind studies and 388 received perampanel for ≥1 year in the OLEx. In the double-blind studies, perampanel co-administered with an EIAED (carbamazepine, eslicarbazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin) had reduced efficacy compared with non-EIAEDs due to increased clearance; this was particularly evident at higher doses, although these differences were still greater than placebo. In the OLEx, concomitant administration of both non-EIAEDs and EIAEDs was associated with sustained efficacy, with slightly better efficacy during the first, second and third years of perampanel exposure for non-EIAEDs compared with EIAEDs.ConclusionPerampanel demonstrated good and sustained long-term efficacy against SGS. With the recent FDA approval of perampanel for monotherapy use for partial seizures, non-EIAED data may be more relevant for consideration if perampanel is used as a single agent (no other AED) while real-world data and experience are accumulated.Study supportEisai Inc.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document