scholarly journals 49 A trainee led quality improvement project to increase satisfaction of junior doctors in a high volume neurosurgical unit

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris McKinnon ◽  
Joseph Wood ◽  
Rory Piper ◽  
Ursula Schulz ◽  
Claire Pulford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Improvement Project

524 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: INCORPORATING COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT INTO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CLERKING

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii8-ii13
Author(s):  
A Oates
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Medical Team ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Efficient Detection ◽  
User Friendly

Abstract Elderly patients transferred to community hospitals often have complex medical, social, psychological, functional and pharmacological backgrounds that require careful assessment in order to create and deliver a high quality, patient-centred care plan. Unfortunately, time pressures experienced by staff in acute hospitals can make Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) unfeasible for every patient. Moreover, junior members of the medical team may be unsure as to which aspects of a patient’s background and presentation constitute important elements of a CGA. Failure to recognise and document pertinent issues can lead to prolonged admissions, disjointed care and failed discharges. Admission to a community hospital presents a convenient ‘checkpoint’ in the patient’s hospital journey at which to undertake a CGA. Recording the relevant information in an effective clerking proforma when the patient is admitted ensures that this information is displayed clearly and in a way that is accessible to all members of the multidisciplinary team. The pre-existing clerking proforma at Amersham Community Hospital omitted several important elements of CGA (such as examination of feet and gait, assessment of mood, FRAX-UK score, creation of a problem list etc.) The aim of this quality improvement project was to create a thorough, yet user-friendly and time-efficient clerking proforma which incorporated the important components of CGA. Using BGS guidance and NICE quality standards, alongside suggestions from the medical team, the existing clerking proforma was adapted and reformed. After one month, feedback from the team was used to further improve the clerking proforma, ensuring that it was user-friendly, whilst meeting the standards set out by NICE and BGS. This was repeated as part of a second PDSA cycle. The improved clerking proforma enables junior doctors to undertake a thorough and holistic assessment, promoting efficient detection of issues and the delivery of a higher quality of care.

10 Improving Communication About Death Between Primary and Secondary Care: A Quality Improvement Project

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i1-i8
Author(s):  
J Arumugam ◽  
R Laud ◽  
P Naydenova
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Discharge Summary ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Lack Of Information ◽  
Discharge Letter ◽  
Death Notification ◽  
Electronic Discharge Summary ◽  
Hospital Teams

Abstract Introduction Communication between the hospital and primary care regarding the death of a patient is incredibly important. Previous literature surrounding this area has shown that it is often done poorly, resulting in substandard documentation. Furthermore, lack of information for General Practitioners (GPs) means it is difficult for them to enter discussions with families, which can negatively impact on the bereavement process. The previous expectation was that an electronic discharge summary was completed, but that this was not optimally designed to inform GPs about the circumstances surrounding the death. Reasons given that summaries were not completed included: the busy workload of junior doctors and the lack of awareness of their importance. Methods The aim of our quality improvement project was to ensure 80% of GPs received notification and information about a patient’s death by August 2018. Following an initial cycle to assess the baseline notification rates, we developed a standardized death notification letter following feedback from local GPs. This included information such as date of death, if the coroner had been informed and a brief summary of events. Following introduction of the letter, we recorded the uptake and then gained further feedback regarding the ways in which it could be improved. A final cycle was then implemented. Results Baseline data showed an electronic discharge letter was only being completed in 13.3% of cases (n=3/21). Following introduction of the new letter, 83.6% were completed (n=56/67). Conclusions In conclusion, the introduction of a simple and standardized letter template has vastly increased the notification of GPs about a patient’s death from our hospital. Limitations of our project included the varying numbers of deaths in audited periods and some hospital teams having a separate process in place.

scholarly journals Improving feedback on junior doctors’ prescribing errors: mixed-methods evaluation of a quality improvement project

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Reynolds ◽  
Seetal Jheeta ◽  
Jonathan Benn ◽  
Inderjit Sanghera ◽  
Ann Jacklin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Prescribing Errors ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Mixed Methods Evaluation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document