Multiperiod Mean Conditional Value at Risk Asset Allocation: Is It Advantageous to Be Time Consistent?

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 358-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Forsyth
2005 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALEXEI CHEKHLOV ◽  
STANISLAV URYASEV ◽  
MICHAEL ZABARANKIN

A new one-parameter family of risk measures called Conditional Drawdown (CDD) has been proposed. These measures of risk are functionals of the portfolio drawdown (underwater) curve considered in active portfolio management. For some value of the tolerance parameter α, in the case of a single sample path, drawdown functional is defined as the mean of the worst (1 - α) * 100% drawdowns. The CDD measure generalizes the notion of the drawdown functional to a multi-scenario case and can be considered as a generalization of deviation measure to a dynamic case. The CDD measure includes the Maximal Drawdown and Average Drawdown as its limiting cases. Mathematical properties of the CDD measure have been studied and efficient optimization techniques for CDD computation and solving asset-allocation problems with a CDD measure have been developed. The CDD family of risk functionals is similar to Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), which is also called Mean Shortfall, Mean Excess Loss, or Tail Value-at-Risk. Some recommendations on how to select the optimal risk functionals for getting practically stable portfolios have been provided. A real-life asset-allocation problem has been solved using the proposed measures. For this particular example, the optimal portfolios for cases of Maximal Drawdown, Average Drawdown, and several intermediate cases between these two have been found.


2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 39-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kris Boudt ◽  
Peter Carl ◽  
Brian Peterson

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 3-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Drapeau ◽  
Michael Kupper ◽  
Antonis Papapantoleon

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Yuan Hu ◽  
W. Brent Lindquist ◽  
Svetlozar T. Rachev

This paper investigates performance attribution measures as a basis for constraining portfolio optimization. We employ optimizations that minimize conditional value-at-risk and investigate two performance attributes, asset allocation (AA) and the selection effect (SE), as constraints on asset weights. The test portfolio consists of stocks from the Dow Jones Industrial Average index. Values for the performance attributes are established relative to two benchmarks, equi-weighted and price-weighted portfolios of the same stocks. Performance of the optimized portfolios is judged using comparisons of cumulative price and the risk-measures: maximum drawdown, Sharpe ratio, Sortino–Satchell ratio and Rachev ratio. The results suggest that achieving SE performance thresholds requires larger turnover values than that required for achieving comparable AA thresholds. The results also suggest a positive role in price and risk-measure performance for the imposition of constraints on AA and SE.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document