A heat-shock-like response with cytoskeletal disruption occurs following hydrostatic pressure in MG-63 osteosarcoma cells

1993 ◽  
Vol 71 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 361-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine L. Haskin ◽  
Kyriacos A. Athanasiou ◽  
Robert Klebe ◽  
Ivan L. Cameron

Human osteosarcoma cells, MG-63, were exposed to a hydrostatic pressure shock of 4.0 MPa for 20 min. Changes in subcellular distribution of the cytoskeletal elements and heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) were followed by indirect immunofluorescence and by avidin–biotin–peroxidase protocols. During recovery, total cellular RNA was determined and actin and aldolase mRNA content was followed using reverse transcription – polymerase chain reaction techniques. Hydrostatic pressure caused cell rounding (but not cell death), disruption of microtubules, collapse of intermediate filaments to a perinuclear location, collapse of actin stress fibers into globular aggregates in the cytoplasm, and the formation of several large elongated intranuclear actin inclusions. During recovery, the cells flattened, reorganized microtubules, and redistributed intermediate filaments prior to the reappearance of actin stress fibers. At 20 and 60 min following the initiation of hydrostatic pressure, there was increased anti-hsp70 staining at the nuclear membrane and concentration of hsp70 in four to six granules in the nucleus. At 120 min following the hydrostatic pressure, hsp70 showed intense staining in the cytoplasm and hsp70-containing granules in the nucleus disappeared. Cellular RNA decreased during the first 120-min posthydrostatic pressure shock and then recovered to near prehydrostatic pressure treatment levels by 240 min. Actin mRNA abundance, in relation to aldolase mRNA abundance, showed the same temporal pattern of initial decrease, followed by increase as did total RNA. Review of the literature indicated that eukaryotic cells respond to heat shock and to hydrostatic pressure by disruption of the cytoskeletal elements and by similar modifications in genetic expression. In this study, the observed responses of MG-63 cells to a 4-MPa hydrostatic pressure shock was like the reported response of mammalian cells to a 43 °C heat shock.Key words: heat shock response, hydrostatic pressure, cytoskeleton.

Aquaculture ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 110 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 229-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Malison ◽  
Terrence B. Kayes ◽  
James A. Held ◽  
Terence P. Barry ◽  
Clyde H. Amundson

Cell Reports ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1511-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaming Jiu ◽  
Jaakko Lehtimäki ◽  
Sari Tojkander ◽  
Fang Cheng ◽  
Harri Jäälinoja ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Malison ◽  
James A. Held ◽  
Lynne S. Weil ◽  
Terrence B. Kayes ◽  
Gary H. Thorgaard

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
T DOMITROVIC ◽  
F PALHANO ◽  
C BARJAFIDALGO ◽  
M DEFREITAS ◽  
M ORLANDO ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 627-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Hadjiantoniou ◽  
Louise Guolla ◽  
Andrew E. Pelling

2011 ◽  
Vol 301 (5) ◽  
pp. L656-L666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Sandbo ◽  
Andrew Lau ◽  
Jacob Kach ◽  
Caitlyn Ngam ◽  
Douglas Yau ◽  
...  

Myofibroblast differentiation induced by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and characterized by de novo expression of smooth muscle (SM)-specific proteins is a key process in wound healing and in the pathogenesis of fibrosis. We have previously shown that TGF-β-induced expression and activation of serum response factor (SRF) is required for this process. In this study, we examined the signaling mechanism for SRF activation by TGF-β as it relates to pulmonary myofibroblast differentiation. TGF-β stimulated a profound, but delayed (18–24 h), activation of Rho kinase and formation of actin stress fibers, which paralleled SM α-actin expression. The translational inhibitor cycloheximide blocked these processes without affecting Smad-dependent gene transcription. Inhibition of Rho kinase by Y-27632 or depolymerization of actin by latrunculin B resulted in inhibition TGF-β-induced SRF activation and SM α-actin expression, having no effect on Smad signaling. Conversely, stabilization of actin stress fibers by jasplakinolide was sufficient to drive these processes in the absence of TGF-β. TGF-β promoted a delayed nuclear accumulation of the SRF coactivator megakaryoblastic leukemia-1 (MKL1)/myocardin-related transcription factor-A, which was inhibited by latrunculin B. Furthermore, TGF-β also induced MKL1 expression, which was inhibited by latrunculin B, by SRF inhibitor CCG-1423, or by SRF knockdown. Together, these data suggest a triphasic model for myofibroblast differentiation in response to TGF-β that involves 1) initial Smad-dependent expression of intermediate signaling molecules driving Rho activation and stress fiber formation, 2) nuclear accumulation of MKL1 and activation of SRF as a result of actin polymerization, and 3) SRF-dependent expression of MKL1, driving further myofibroblast differentiation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document