ANTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION USING POROUS HYDROXYAPATITE CERAMICS(HAP) FOR CERVICAL MYELOPATHY-RADIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS AND BIOMECHANICAL STUDY

Bioceramics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Suetsuna ◽  
E. Kenuka ◽  
A. Makino ◽  
M. Wada ◽  
N. Nakai
Spine ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (15) ◽  
pp. 2167-2173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisatoshi Baba ◽  
Nobuaki Furusawa ◽  
Shinichi Imura ◽  
Norio Kawahara ◽  
Hiroyuki Tsuchiya ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Hawkins ◽  
F. Yaghmai ◽  
R. Arthur Gindin

✓ The authors report the case of a patient with cervical myelopathy who was examined at autopsy 2 years after a second anterior cervical fusion by Cloward's technique. The clinical course and pre- and postoperative myelograms are presented. Theories as to the etiology of myelopathy are discussed. This case demonstrates chronic changes that seem to implicate a vascular theory but not the specific vessel or vessels. The mechanism of improvement following the Cloward procedure is not explained by the pathological slides.


2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (06) ◽  
pp. 496-501
Author(s):  
Raffaelino Roperto ◽  
Guglielmo Cacciotti ◽  
Francesco Calvosa ◽  
Luciano Mastronardi

Background Anterior cervical fusion (ACF) with autologous bone was reported > 50 years ago. The continuous development of materials with elastic properties close to that of the cortical bone improves induction of osteogenesis and simplifies the technique of interbody fusion. To determine the safety and efficiency of stand-alone trabecular metal (TM) (or porous tantalum) cages for ACF, we performed a retrospective analysis of 88 consecutive patients with one-level or two-level degenerative disk disease (DDD) causing cervical myelopathy treated by interbody fusion with stand-alone TM cages. Materials and Methods During a 65-month period, 88 consecutive patients had ACF at 105 levels between C3 and C7. All surgeries involved one- or two-segmental DDD producing mild or severe cervical spine myelopathy, in 31 patients (35.2%), associated with unilateral or bilateral radiculopathy. We implanted all disk spaces with unfilled TM trapezoidal cages (Zimmer Biomet Spine, Broomfield, Colorado, United States). Results At a mean follow-up of 31 months (range: 12–65 months), 95.4% of patients had a good to excellent outcome, with subjective and objective improvement of myelopathy; the result was fair in two and poor in two other patients. Radicular pain and/or any deficits disappeared in 84 patients (95.4%) complaining of preoperative myeloradiculopathy. The fusion rate was 68.2% at 6 months and 100% at 1 year. Device fragmentation was never observed. In two cases, a second operation with removal of TM cages, corpectomy, expansion cages, and plating was necessary. Conclusions TM cages appear to be safe and efficient for ACF in DDD patients with myelopathy. To confirm our preliminary impressions, larger studies with long-term follow-up are necessary.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Ajello ◽  
Nicola Marengo ◽  
Paolo Pacca ◽  
Federico Pecoraro ◽  
Francesco Zenga ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-286
Author(s):  
Kuniyoshi Tsuchiya ◽  
Kazuhiro Yamaoka ◽  
Mitsuharu Miyagi ◽  
Takeshi Okamura

Spine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 612-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreeharsha V. Nandyala ◽  
Alejandro Marquez-Lara ◽  
Steven J. Fineberg ◽  
Kern Singh

1994 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toyohiko Isu ◽  
Kyosuke Kamada ◽  
Nobuaki Kobayashi ◽  
Shoji Mabuchi

✓ The authors describe the surgical technique of anterior cervical fusion using bone grafts obtained from cervical vertebral bodies. This series consisted of 90 patients with cervical intervertebral disc disease suffering from cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Thirty-five patients were operated on at one level, 33 at two levels, and 22 at three levels. Postoperative x-ray films showed solid bone fusion in all patients at a mean follow-up time of 24 months (range 1 year to 3 years 6 months). Anterior angulation was found in four (4.4%) of the 90 patients. This surgical procedure has two major advantages: 1) there are no complications related to the iliac donor site, allowing early patient mobilization; and 2) the extensive posterior spur can be removed safely and easily under a wide operative field without damaging the spinal cord and nerve roots.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document