HEMI-HAMATE ARTHROPLASTY VERSUS TRANSARTICULAR KIRSCHNER WIRE FIXATION FOR UNSTABLE DORSAL FRACTURE-DISLOCATION OF THE PROXIMAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT IN THE HAND

Hand Surgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 115-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Barksfield ◽  
B. Bowden ◽  
A. J. Chojnowski
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Kirschner Wire ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Kirschner Wire Fixation ◽  
Wire Fixation ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Fixed Flexion Deformity

Following the introduction of the hemi-hamate arthroplasty (HHA) technique to our unit, we sought to evaluate the early clinical outcomes achieved with this method of fixation and compare these with simple trans-articular Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation for dorsal fracture dislocations (DFD) of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ). Ninteen patients underwent fixation of these injuries with either K-wire fixation (12/19) or hemi-hamate bone grafting (7/19) between 2005 and 2011. At a mean follow-up of 14 weeks median arc of movement at the PIPJ was 65° (range 31° to 108°) following HHA and 56° (range 9° to 85°) (p = 0.82) following temporary transarticular K-wire fixation. Median fixed flexion deformity (FFD) was 20° and 15° for hemi-hamate bone grafting and K-wire fixation respectively. Based upon our findings, transarticular K-wire fixation produced equivalent outcomes to HHA for unstable DFD of the PIPJ in the hand.

The Treatment of Dorsal Fracture-Dislocation of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint by Closed Reduction and Kirschner Wire Fixation: A 16-Year Follow Up

2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 537-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. NEWINGTON ◽  
T. R. C. DAVIS ◽  
N. J. BARTON
Keyword(s):  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Articular Surface ◽  
Kirschner Wire ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Kirschner Wire Fixation ◽  
Wire Fixation

Ten patients who had sustained 11 unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of finger proximal interphalangeal joints were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 16 years. All had been treated acutely by closed reduction and transarticular Kirschner wire fixation of the proximal interphalangeal joint, without any attempt at reduction of the fracture of the base of the middle phalanx, which probably involved 30–60% of the articular surface. Seven of the ten patients complained of no finger pain or stiffness, and none complained of severe pain. There was a mean fixed flexion deformity of 81 at the proximal interphalangeal joint, which had a mean arc of movement of 851. Although subchondral sclerosis and mild joint space narrowing were observed in some instances, there were no severe degenerative changes. These results confirm that this technique is a reliable treatment method for these injuries, and produces satisfactory long-term results.

Dorsal Fracture–Dislocation of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint: A Comparative Study of Percutaneous Kirschner Wire Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. ALADIN ◽  
T. R. C. DAVIS
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Kirschner Wire ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Cerclage Wire ◽  
Kirschner Wire Fixation ◽  
Wire Fixation

Nineteen patients with a dorsal fracture–dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of a finger were treated with either closed reduction and transarticular Kirschner wire fixation (eight cases) or open reduction and internal fixation, using either one or two lag screws (six cases) or a cerclage wire (five cases). At a mean follow-up of 7 (range 6–9) years, most patients reported satisfactory finger function, even though some of the injuries healed with proximal interphalangeal joint incongruency (seven cases) or subluxation (four cases). Those treated by open reduction complained of more “loss of feeling” in the affected finger and those specifically treated by cerclage wire fixation reported more cold intolerance and had a significantly larger fixed flexion deformity (median, 30°: range 18–38°) and a smaller arc of motion (median, 48°: range 45–60°) at the proximal interphalangeal joint, despite having the best radiological outcomes. Closed reduction and transarticular Kirschner wire fixation produced satisfactory results, with none of the eight patients experiencing significant persistent symptoms despite a reduced arc of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion (median=75°; range 60–108°). The results of this relatively simple treatment appear at least as satisfactory as those obtained by the two techniques of open reduction and internal fixation, both of which were technically demanding.

Results of Treatment of Chronic Dorsal Fracture-Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joints of the Fingers

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 798-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. ISHIDA ◽  
Y. IKUTA
Keyword(s):  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Results Of Treatment ◽  
Palmar Plate ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

We reviewed 20 cases of chronic dorsal fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint, with a mean follow-up period of 74 months. In patients without comminuted palmar fragments, open reduction and internal fixation or osteotomy of the malunited fragment provided good results. In treating patients with damaged articular cartilage or with comminuted palmar fragments by palmar plate arthroplasty, poor results were obtained because of secondary osteoarthritic changes.

The hemi-hamate autograft arthroplasty in proximal interphalangeal joint reconstruction: a systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. S. Frueh ◽  
M. Calcagni ◽  
N. Lindenblatt
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Joint Involvement ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Joint Fracture ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

Palmar lip injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joint with dorsal fracture-dislocation are difficult to treat and often require major reconstruction. A systematic review was performed and yielded 177 articles. Thirteen articles on hemi-hamate autograft were included in full-text analysis. Results of 71 cases were summarized. Mean follow-up was 36 months and mean proximal interphalangeal joint range of motion was 77°. Overall complication rate was around 35%. Up to 50% of the patients showed radiographic signs of osteoarthritis. However, few of those patients complained about pain or impaired finger motion. Based on this systematic analysis and review, hemi-hamate autograft can be considered reliable for the reconstruction of acute and chronic proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocations with joint involvement >50%, but longer-term follow-up studies are required to evaluate its outcome, especially regarding the rate of osteoarthritis. Level of Evidence: II

Unstable Dorsal Fracture-Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint: Volar Plate Fixation with or without Bone Graft

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 50-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Milner ◽  
Deepak Samson ◽  
Simon Tan
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Hook Plate ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Average Loss ◽  
Without Bone Graft

Background: To evaluate the treatment of severe dorsal fracture dislocation (DFD) injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) by open reduction, bone grafting and fixation with mini-hook plates. Methods: Fourteen patients with extensive dorsal fracture dislocation of the PIPJ were operatively treated to reconstruct the fractured middle phalanx volar lip using a fabricated hook plate in conjunction with elevation and bone grafting of depressed articular fragments where present. Results: Restoration of PIPJ articular anatomy and congruence by hook plate fixation permitted full-range mobilization of the joint during fracture healing, with an average arc of motion of 81° and an average loss of extension of 12.9° at a minimum of 6 months follow up. Hook plate treatment of PIPJ fracture dislocation restores articular anatomy and joint congruence at a single sitting and permits post-operative mobilization without the need for extension block splinting. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a good range of motion following treatment, however hardware removal and tenolysis was necessary in 36% of cases.

Chronic Fracture Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 783-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. R. M. FAHMY ◽  
N. KENNY ◽  
N. KEHOE
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Range Of Movement ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Pip Joint ◽  
Phalangeal Fracture

The “S” Quattro has proved its value in the treatment of acute displaced comminuted intraarticular phalangeal fracture dislocations. We have used the system to treat five cases of chronic fracture-dislocation or subluxation of the PIP joint. At an average follow-up period of 16.4 months, there was a mean increase in the range of movement of the injured joint by 75°. We recommend this technique for selected cases.

Post-Reduction Stability of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint after Dorsal Fracture Dislocation—A Cadaveric Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 382-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Eu-Jin Cheah ◽  
Tun-Lin Foo ◽  
Janice Chin-Yi Liao ◽  
Min He ◽  
Alphonsus Khin-Sze Chong
Keyword(s):  
Traction Force ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Full Extension ◽  
Early Motion ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Reduction Stability ◽  
The One

Background: Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) dorsal fracture dislocations (DFD) are challenging injuries. Treatment aims to achieve stability of the PIPJ after reduction so that early motion can be initiated. We studied how increasing articular destruction would affect post reduction stability and investigate the amount of traction and PIPJ flexion needed to maintain the reduction. Methods: Increasing amounts (20%, 40% and 60%) of damage to the volar lip of the middle phalanx in cadaveric specimens were created to represent PIPJ DFD that were stable, of tenuous stability and frankly unstable. Traction forces and PIPJ flexion needed to maintain the reduction were then measured. Results: The PIPJ DFD with 20% damage were stable and did not subluxe while the one with 40% articular involvement was stable after reduction. For unstable the PIPJ with 60% involvement, the more the PIPJ was flexed, the less traction force was needed to hold the joint in reduction. For PIPJ flexion of 20 degrees, a minimum 4.4N of force is needed to maintain reduction while PIPJ flexion of 10 degrees required a minimum 5.0N of force. No amount of force could maintain PIPJ reduction if traction was performed in full extension. Conclusions: In our model, PIPJ DFD with less than 30% articular damage are stable while those with 30% to 50% of involvement have tenuous stability. For the unstable PIPJ DFD, traction obviates the need for excessive flexion of the PIPJ to maintain joint reduction. This information should be considered in treatment modalities for PIPJ DFD, as well in the design of external traction devices for the treatment of PIPJ DFD.

Volar plating versus external fixation for unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110593
Author(s):  
Atsuhiko Murayama ◽  
Kentaro Watanabe ◽  
Hideyuki Ota ◽  
Shigeru Kurimoto ◽  
Hitoshi Hirata
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Volar Plating ◽  
Distal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Active Flexion ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Distal Interphalangeal

We retrospectively compared the results of volar plating and dynamic external fixation for acute unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint with a depressed fragment. We treated 31 patients (31 fingers), 12 with volar buttress plating and 19 with dynamic external fixation. Follow-up averaged 35 and 40 months in the two groups, with a minimal 6-month follow-up. Average active flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 95° after plate fixation and 87° after external fixation, with an active extension lag of –6° and –9°, respectively. Active flexion at the distal interphalangeal joint averaged 67° in the plate group and 58° in the external fixation group, with active extension lags of 0° and –5°, respectively. We conclude that both methods can obtain a good range of motion at the proximal interphalangeal joint. A limitation of the extension of the distal interphalangeal joint occurred with dynamic external fixation but not with volar buttress plating. Level of evidence: IV

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document