Outcome of Monteggia Fracture Dislocation in Children Treated With K Wires in Nepalgunj Medical College

Introduction: Monteggia fracture dislocations are rare injuries (<5%) where missed treatment results into deformity and dysfunction of forearm and hand. For the better functional result early diagnosis, accurate reduction of radial head and rigid fixation of ulna and immobilization during post-operative period for ligamentous healing around radius is vital. So operative treatment has been the primary method of treatment to prevent deformity and disability in monteggia fracture dislocation. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the time taken to unite fractures, complications encountered and assess the functional outcome on the basis of K-wire fixation in monteggia fracture dislocation in children. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in Nepalgunj Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kohalpur, Banke with monteggia fracture dislocation in children. Results: Thirty-two monteggia fracture dislocation in children between six to 14 years of age were treated with intramedullary K-wires after reduction of radial head. Seven cases had open reduction, and five needed trans-capitellar K-wire supplementation. Mean union time was 8.44±1.94 weeks ranging from seven to 12 weeks. The functional outcome on the basis of Anderson’s scoring system was excellent in 25(78.1%), good in three and optimal in four cases. Conclusion: Monteggia fracture dislocation is better treated early and early mobilization of elbow joint is needed for better functional results.

A retrospective analysis of the definitive management of open talus fractures at a major trauma centre, comparing ORIF to FUSION: cohort study and audit of BOAST 4 guidelines

Purpose Open talus fractures are notoriously difficult to manage, and they are commonly associated with a high level of complications including non-union, avascular necrosis and infection. Currently, the management of such injuries is based upon BOAST 4 guidelines although there is no suggested definitive management, and thus, definitive management is based upon surgeon preference. The key principles of open talus fracture management which do not vary between surgeons are early debridement, orthoplastic wound care, anatomic reduction and definitive fixation whenever possible. However, there is much debate over whether the talus should be preserved or removed after open talus fracture/dislocation and proceeded to tibiocalcaneal fusion. Methods A review of electronic hospital records for open talus fractures from 2014 to 2021 returned fourteen patients with fifteen open talus fractures. Seven cases were initially managed with ORIF, and five cases were definitively managed with FUSION, while the others were managed with alternative methods. We collected patient’s age, gender, surgical complications, surgical risk factors and post-treatment functional ability and pain and compliance with BOAST guidelines. The average follow-up of the cohort was 4 years and one month. EQ-5D-5L and FAAM-ADL/Sports score was used as a patient reported outcome measure. Data were analysed using the software PRISM. Results Comparison between FUSION and ORIF groups showed no statistically significant difference in EQ-5D-5L score (P = 0.13), FAAM-ADL (P = 0.20), FAAM-Sport (P = 0.34), infection rate (P = 0.55), surgical times (P = 0.91) and time to weight bearing (P = 0.39), despite a higher proportion of polytrauma and Hawkins III and IV fractures in the FUSION group. Conclusion FUSION is typically used as second line to ORIF or failed ORIF. However, there is a lack of studies that directly compared outcome in open talus fracture patients definitively managed with FUSION or ORIF. Our results demonstrate for the first time that FUSION may not be inferior to ORIF in terms of patient functional outcome, infection rate and quality of life, in the management of patients with open talus fracture patients. Of note, as open talus fractures have increased risks of complications such as osteonecrosis and non-union, FUSION should be considered as a viable option to mitigate these potential complications in these patients.

Is It Possible to Perform Fifth Carpometacarpal Joint Arthroscopy? Cadaveric Study on Its Feasibility, Safety, and Potential Hazards in Portal Creation

Background Fifth carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) fracture dislocation is a relatively rare injury and most will require operative treatment because of its unstable nature. Improper reduction and fixation lead to joint surface destruction, pain, and reduced grasping power. Intra-articular fragment reduction is often obscured by dorsally displaced ulnar fragment. Therefore, fifth CMCJ arthroscopy can be advantageous in assisting intra-articular fragment reduction. However, there is no detailed description of the portal landmarks or portals' relationship with adjacent important structures in the literature. Purposes To explore the feasibility and safety of fifth CMCJ arthroscopy, locations of the portals are examined in cadaveric hand specimens. Their proximity to important anatomical structures such as dorsal cutaneous branch of ulnar nerve (DCBUN), ring finger and little finger extensor digitorum communis (EDC), and extensor digiti minimi (EDM) is measured. Methods Fifth CMCJ arthroscopy is performed on 11 cadaveric hand specimens by specialist-level surgeon. The portals are marked and portal positions are further confirmed under the fluoroscopy. Then the cadaveric specimens were undergone anatomical dissection by specialist-level surgeon. During dissection, the spatial relationship between the portal positions and DCBUN, EDC to ring finger and little finger, and EDM is identified. The distance between the portals and the above important structures was measured in millimeters. Results DCBUN was consistently found between fourth metacarpohamate (4-MH) and fifth metacarpohamate (5-MH) portals, with it being closer to the latter (mean distance, 2.03 mm; range, 0–4.43 mm; standard deviation [SD], 1.09 mm). The closest tendon for 4-MH portal is ring finger EDC (mean distance, 2.65 mm; range, 0–5.89 mm; SD, 1.78 mm), while 5-MH portal and accessory portal were closest to EDC (mean distance, 1.88 mm; range, 0–3.69 mm; SD, 1.25 mm) and EDM (mean distance, 7.79 mm; range, 6.63–10.72 mm; SD, 1.49 mm), respectively. During the process of specimen dissection, we found no damage to the above structures after portal introduction. Conclusion The above findings support the use of fifth CMCJ arthroscopy, which can be used for assisted reduction in fifth metacarpal base fracture dislocation and hamate body fracture. Gentle soft tissue spreading technique during portal creation prevents injury to the important structure surrounding the portals. Level of evidence This is a Level V study.

Restoration of neglected fracture dislocation hip in elderly: a case report

<p class="abstract">Neglected traumatic fracture dislocation of the hip is a challenging problem due to soft tissue contractures, adhesions, fibro fatty tissue filling acetabulum, avascular necrosis, arthritis and myositis ossificans. These types of injury often get missed at initial evaluation in the presence of distracting injuries and in poly trauma patients. Femoral head fractures account for only 7-16% of all hip fracture dislocations, with combined femoral head and acetabular fractures in elderly being even lower. Literature favours primary hip replacement as compared to hip salvage in age above 60 years and in patients with neglected hip fracture dislocations of more than 3 months duration due to high chances of afore mentioned complications. Here, we report a case of 69 years old male with neglected hip fracture dislocation associated with posterior acetabular wall and femoral head fracture for the challenges in management with a total hip replacement.</p>

A Novel Case of Neglected Monteggia Fracture Dislocation

Background: The Monteggia fracture-dislocation is a rare condition among children, and its treatment is still controversial. The treatment can become quite complicated when the diagnosis is delayed. There is a broad range of surgical treatments with various complications like subluxations, degenerative changes, and radial head deformity. The present case was reported as a novel surgical treatment choice for neglected Monteggia fracture-dislocation. Case Report: A 16 year-old boy presented with left elbow severe range of motion (ROM) limitation and pain who was diagnosed with neglected Monteggia fracture-dislocation. The patient went through open reduction beside internal fixation of the ulnar shaft via Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate (LC-DCP) and radio-capitellar joint reduction and provisional fixation by a pin. The patient recovered after three months with a significant increase in elbow ROM without any complications. Conclusion: This method could be an appropriate treatment of choice for neglected Monteggia fractures which indeed had excellent outcomes without complication.

Simultaneous Ipsilateral “Floating Hip” with Hip Dislocation and Femoral Neck and Shaft Fractures Associated with “Floating Knee” Injuries with Patella Fracture and Traumatic Sciatic Nerve Injury

Simultaneous ipsilateral “floating-hip” and “floating-knee” injuries are very rare and severe, and they occur in high-velocity road traffic accidents. A 55-year-old man presented with posterior wall fracture – dislocation of the acetabulum, complete fracture – dislocation of the femoral head, ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture, open patellar fracture, Gustilo type II, tibial fracture, and traumatic sciatic nerve injury/peroneal division. Given the fact that hip dislocation is an orthopedic emergency, we first did closed external tibial fixation, femoral head reduction, osteosynthesis of the acetabular fracture, and partial patellectomy. After 2 days, the patient underwent a second surgery; fixation of the neck and femoral shaft fractures was done, with a self-dynamic internal fixator. After 14 months from the injuries, radiographs show complete healing of all fractures, the patient walks independently without crutches, and the peroneal nerve is partially recovered. Despite the seriousness of the presented injuries, we did not have any complications, and 14 months after the injury, the femoral head is still viable, with no signs of femoral head osteonecrosis.

Rehabilitation Strategies in Management of Complex Case of Cervical Burst Fracture- A Case Report

A burst fracture is a descriptive term for an injury to the spine in which the vertebral body is severely compressed. They typically occur from severe trauma, such as a motor vehicle accident or a fall from a height. With a great deal of force vertically onto the spine, a vertebra may be crushed .If it is only crushed in the front part of the spine, it becomes wedge shaped and is called a compression fracture. However, if the vertebral body is crushed in all directions it is called a burst fracture. Burst fractures cause severe pain. The diagnosis of a burst fracture is usually made by x-rays and a CT scan. Occasionally, an MRI scan may be ordered as well, in order to assess the amount of soft tissue trauma, bleeding or ligament disruption. The review of the CT scan and x-rays allows the treating physician to make a determination as to the level of the fracture, whether it is a compression fracture, burst fracture or fracture dislocation. A spinal compression fracture also may be caused by trauma to the spine. Events that may cause trauma to the spine can include: A car accident, a hard fall or a fall from a height of more than 15 feet, landing on the feet, and a blow to the head. Any fall from a standing height that results in a spinal compression fracture or any other fracture most likely indicates weak bones due to osteoporosis. The physical exam should be performed to document both spinal deformity, that is, angulation of the spine or tenderness of the spine at the level of fracture, as well as, a neurologic exam. Neurologic exam should include testing of the muscle strength, sensation, and reflexes of the lower extremities, as well as, testing of bowel and bladder sphincter control. A 36 year old man was brought to the hospital as he had a fall from electric pole approximately 20 feet height. He had sustaining injury to the neck. Surgery was done as patient was diagnosed with C6 burst fracture with fracture dislocation of C5-C7. Therapeutic Interventions includes exercises, strengthening exercises, cervical fracture fixation, and traction.