Polynomial and power series ring extensions from sequences

Author(s):  
Gyu Whan Chang ◽  
Phan Thanh Toan

Let [Formula: see text] be a commutative ring with identity. Let [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] be the collection of polynomials and, respectively, of power series with coefficients in [Formula: see text]. There are a lot of multiplications in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] such that together with the usual addition, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] become rings that contain [Formula: see text] as a subring. These multiplications are from a class of sequences [Formula: see text] of positive integers. The trivial case of [Formula: see text], i.e. [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text], gives the usual polynomial and power series ring. The case [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text] gives the well-known Hurwitz polynomial and Hurwitz power series ring. In this paper, we study divisibility properties of these polynomial and power series ring extensions for general sequences [Formula: see text] including UFDs and GCD-domains. We characterize when these polynomial and power series ring extensions are isomorphic to each other. The relation between them and the usual polynomial and power series ring is also presented.

1998 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongkui Liu

Let R be a commutative ring and (S, ≤) a strictly ordered monoid which satisfies the condition that 0 ≤ s for every s ∈ S. We show that the generalised power series ring [[RS ≤]] is a PF-ring if and only if R is a PF-ring.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (02) ◽  
pp. 1350083 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. ALHEVAZ ◽  
D. KIANI

One of the important properties of commutative rings, proved by McCoy [Remarks on divisors of zero, Amer. Math. Monthly49(5) (1942) 286–295], is that if two nonzero polynomials annihilate each other over a commutative ring then each polynomial has a nonzero annihilator in the base ring. Nielsen [Semi-commutativity and the McCoy condition, J. Algebra298(1) (2006) 134–141] generalizes this property to non-commutative rings. Let M be a monoid and σ be an automorphism of a ring R. For the continuation of McCoy property of non-commutative rings, in this paper, we extend the McCoy's theorem to skew Laurent power series ring R[[x, x-1; σ]] and skew monoid ring R * M over general non-commutative rings. Constructing various examples, we classify how these skew versions of McCoy property behaves under various ring extensions. Moreover, we investigate relations between these properties and other standard ring-theoretic properties such as zip rings and rings with Property (A). As a consequence we extend and unify several known results related to McCoy rings.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1850199
Author(s):  
Abdollah Alhevaz ◽  
Ebrahim Hashemi ◽  
Rasul Mohammadi

It is well known that a polynomial [Formula: see text] over a commutative ring [Formula: see text] with identity is a zero-divisor in [Formula: see text] if and only if [Formula: see text] has a non-zero annihilator in the base ring, where [Formula: see text] is the polynomial ring with indeterminate [Formula: see text] over [Formula: see text]. But this result fails in non-commutative rings and in the case of formal power series ring. In this paper, we consider the problem of determining some annihilator properties of the formal power series ring [Formula: see text] over an associative non-commutative ring [Formula: see text]. We investigate relations between power series-wise McCoy property and other standard ring-theoretic properties. In this context, we consider right zip rings, right strongly [Formula: see text] rings and rings with right Property [Formula: see text]. We give a generalization (in the case of non-commutative ring) of a classical results related to the annihilator of formal power series rings over the commutative Noetherian rings. We also give a partial answer, in the case of formal power series ring, to the question posed in [1 Question, p. 16].


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (03) ◽  
pp. 361-368
Author(s):  
Ali Benhissi

Let A be a commutative ring with unit. We characterize when A is nonnil-Noetherian in terms of the quotient ring A/ Nil(A) and in terms of the power series ring A[[X]].


Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Jae Kwon ◽  
Jung Wook Lim

Let R be a commutative ring with identity, and let S be a (not necessarily saturated) multiplicative subset of R. We define R to be a nonnil-S-Noetherian ring if each nonnil ideal of R is S-finite. In this paper, we study some properties of nonnil-S-Noetherian rings. More precisely, we investigate nonnil-S-Noetherian rings via the Cohen-type theorem, the flat extension, the faithfully flat extension, the polynomial ring extension, and the power series ring extension.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 01002
Author(s):  
Toan Phan Thanh

Let R be a commutative ring with identity. Let R[X] and R[[X]] be the polynomial ring and the power series ring respectively over R. Being the completion of R[X] (under the X-adic topology), R[[X]] does not always share the same property with R[X]. In this paper, we present some known strange behaviors of R[[X]] compared to those of R[X].


1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-491
Author(s):  
Joong Ho Kim

LetRbe a commutative ring with identity andR((n))=R[[X1,…,Xn]]the power series ring innindependent indeterminatesX1,…,XnoverR.Ris called power invariant if wheneverSis a ring such thatR[[X1]]≅S[[X1]], thenR≅S.Ris said to be forever-power-invariant ifSis a ring andnis any positive integer such thatR((n))≅S((n))thenR≅SLetIC(R)denote the set of alla∈Rsuch that there isR- homomorphismσ:R[[X]]→Rwithσ(X)=a. ThenIC(R)is an ideal ofR. It is shown that ifIC(R)is nil,Ris forever-power-invariant


Author(s):  
H. Al-Ezeh

For a commutative ring with unity,A, it is proved that the power series ringA〚X〛is a PF-ring if and only if for any two countable subsetsSandTofAsuch thatS⫅annA(T), there existsc∈annA(T)such thatbc=bfor allb∈S. Also it is proved that a power series ringA〚X〛is a PP-ring if and only ifAis a PP-ring in which every increasing chain of idempotents inAhas a supremum which is an idempotent.


1997 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Anderson ◽  
David E. Dobbs ◽  
Moshe Roitman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document