The Diophantine equation (m2 + n2)x + (2mn)y = (m + n)2z

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (08) ◽  
pp. 1701-1708
Author(s):  
Xiao-Hui Yan

For fixed coprime positive integers [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], there is a conjecture that the exponential Diophantine equation [Formula: see text] has only the positive integer solution [Formula: see text] for any positive integer [Formula: see text]. This is the analogue of Jésmanowicz conjecture. In this paper, we consider the equation [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] are coprime positive integers, and prove that the equation has no positive integer solution if [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text].

2014 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
TAKAFUMI MIYAZAKI ◽  
NOBUHIRO TERAI

AbstractLet $m$, $a$, $c$ be positive integers with $a\equiv 3, 5~({\rm mod} \hspace{0.334em} 8)$. We show that when $1+ c= {a}^{2} $, the exponential Diophantine equation $\mathop{({m}^{2} + 1)}\nolimits ^{x} + \mathop{(c{m}^{2} - 1)}\nolimits ^{y} = \mathop{(am)}\nolimits ^{z} $ has only the positive integer solution $(x, y, z)= (1, 1, 2)$ under the condition $m\equiv \pm 1~({\rm mod} \hspace{0.334em} a)$, except for the case $(m, a, c)= (1, 3, 8)$, where there are only two solutions: $(x, y, z)= (1, 1, 2), ~(5, 2, 4). $ In particular, when $a= 3$, the equation $\mathop{({m}^{2} + 1)}\nolimits ^{x} + \mathop{(8{m}^{2} - 1)}\nolimits ^{y} = \mathop{(3m)}\nolimits ^{z} $ has only the positive integer solution $(x, y, z)= (1, 1, 2)$, except if $m= 1$. The proof is based on elementary methods and Baker’s method.


2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
Bo He ◽  
Alain Togbé ◽  
Shichun Yang

Let $a,b,$ and $c$ be positive integers. We show that if $(a,b) =(N^k-1,N)$, where $N,k\geq 2$, then there is at most one positive integer solution $(x,y)$ to the exponential Diophantine equation $|a^x-b^y|=c$, unless $(N,k)=(2,2)$. Combining this with results of Bennett [3] and the first author [6], we stated all cases for which the equation $|(N^k \pm 1)^x - N^y|=c$ has more than one positive integer solutions $(x,y)$.


2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-206
Author(s):  
Elif kizildere ◽  
Maohua le ◽  
Gökhan Soydan

AbstractLet l,m,r be fixed positive integers such that 2| l, 3lm, l > r and 3 | r. In this paper, using the BHV theorem on the existence of primitive divisors of Lehmer numbers, we prove that if min{rlm2 − 1,(l − r)lm2 + 1} > 30, then the equation (rlm2 − 1)x + ((l − r)lm2 + 1)y = (lm)z has only the positive integer solution (x,y,z) = (1,1,2).


2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
MOU-JIE DENG ◽  
DONG-MING HUANG

Let $a,b,c$ be a primitive Pythagorean triple and set $a=m^{2}-n^{2},b=2mn,c=m^{2}+n^{2}$, where $m$ and $n$ are positive integers with $m>n$, $\text{gcd}(m,n)=1$ and $m\not \equiv n~(\text{mod}~2)$. In 1956, Jeśmanowicz conjectured that the only positive integer solution to the Diophantine equation $(m^{2}-n^{2})^{x}+(2mn)^{y}=(m^{2}+n^{2})^{z}$ is $(x,y,z)=(2,2,2)$. We use biquadratic character theory to investigate the case with $(m,n)\equiv (2,3)~(\text{mod}~4)$. We show that Jeśmanowicz’ conjecture is true in this case if $m+n\not \equiv 1~(\text{mod}~16)$ or $y>1$. Finally, using these results together with Laurent’s refinement of Baker’s theorem, we show that Jeśmanowicz’ conjecture is true if $(m,n)\equiv (2,3)~(\text{mod}~4)$ and $n<100$.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 1107-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai Yang ◽  
Ruiqin Fu

Let D1, D2, D, k, λ be fixed integers such that D1 ≥ 1, D2 ≥ 1, gcd (D1, D2) = 1, D = D1D2 is not a square, ∣k∣ > 1, gcd (D, k) = 1 and λ = 1 or 4 according as 2 ∤ k or not. In this paper, we prove that every solution class S(l) of the equation D1x2-D2y2 = λkz, gcd (x, y) = 1, z > 0, has a unique positive integer solution [Formula: see text] satisfying [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], where z runs over all integer solutions (x,y,z) of S(l),(u1,v1) is the fundamental solution of Pell's equation u2 - Dv2 = 1. This result corrects and improves some previous results given by M. H. Le.


2012 ◽  
Vol 241-244 ◽  
pp. 2650-2653
Author(s):  
Jian Ping Wang

ln this paper, using a deep result on the existence of primitive divisors of Lehmer numbers given by Y. Bilu, G. Hanrot and P. M. Voutier, we prove that the equation has no positive integer solution (x, y, m, p, q), where p and q are odd primes with p>3, gcd(x, y)=1 and y is not the sum of two consecutive squares.


2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
MI-MI MA ◽  
YONG-GAO CHEN

In 1956, Jeśmanowicz conjectured that, for any positive integers $m$ and $n$ with $m>n$, $\gcd (m,n)=1$ and $2\nmid m+n$, the Diophantine equation $(m^{2}-n^{2})^{x}+(2mn)^{y}=(m^{2}+n^{2})^{z}$ has only the positive integer solution $(x,y,z)=(2,2,2)$. In this paper, we prove the conjecture if $4\nmid mn$ and $y\geq 2$.


2013 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
NOBUHIRO TERAI

AbstractLet $q$ be an odd prime such that ${q}^{t} + 1= 2{c}^{s} $, where $c, t$ are positive integers and $s= 1, 2$. We show that the Diophantine equation ${x}^{2} + {q}^{m} = {c}^{n} $ has only the positive integer solution $(x, m, n)= ({c}^{s} - 1, t, 2s)$ under some conditions. The proof is based on elementary methods and a result concerning the Diophantine equation $({x}^{n} - 1)/ (x- 1)= {y}^{2} $ due to Ljunggren. We also verify that when $2\leq c\leq 30$ with $c\not = 12, 24$, the Diophantine equation ${x}^{2} + \mathop{(2c- 1)}\nolimits ^{m} = {c}^{n} $ has only the positive integer solution $(x, m, n)= (c- 1, 1, 2). $


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (05) ◽  
pp. 1223-1228
Author(s):  
Hai Yang ◽  
Ruiqin Fu

Let [Formula: see text] be a positive integer which is not a square. Further, let [Formula: see text] be the least positive integer solution of the Pell equation [Formula: see text], and let [Formula: see text] denote the class number of binary quadratic primitive forms of discriminant [Formula: see text]. If [Formula: see text] satisfies [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], then [Formula: see text] is called an exceptional number. In this paper, under the assumption that there have no exceptional numbers, we prove that the equation [Formula: see text] has no positive integer solutions [Formula: see text] satisfy [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text].


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 23-32
Author(s):  
Murat Alan

Abstract Let m > 1 be a positive integer. We show that the exponential Diophantine equation mx + (m + 1) y = (1 + m + m 2) z has only the positive integer solution (x, y, z) = (2, 1, 1) when m ≥ 2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document