Some commutativity theorems for rings with involution involving generalized derivations

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 1950001 ◽  
Author(s):  
My Abdallah Idrissi ◽  
Lahcen Oukhtite

Our purpose in this paper is to investigate commutativity of a ring with involution [Formula: see text] which admits a generalized derivation satisfying certain algebraic identities. Some well-known results characterizing commutativity of prime rings have been generalized. Moreover, we provide examples to show that the assumed restrictions cannot be relaxed.

Filomat ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1439-1452
Author(s):  
Bharat Bhushan ◽  
Gurninder Sandhu ◽  
Shakir Ali ◽  
Deepak Kumar

Let R be a ring. An additive mapping F : R ? R is called a generalized derivation if there exists a derivation d of R such that F(xy) = F(x)y + xd(y) for all x,y ? R. The main purpose of this paper is to characterize some specific classes of generalized derivations of rings. Precisely, we describe the structure of generalized derivations of noncommutative prime rings with involution that belong to a particular class of generalized derivations. Consequently, some recent results in this line of investigation have been extended. Moreover, some suitable examples showing that the assumed hypotheses are crucial, are also given.


Author(s):  
Deepak Kumar ◽  
Bharat Bhushan ◽  
Gurninder S. Sandhu

Let [Formula: see text] be a prime ring with involution ∗ of the second kind. An additive mapping [Formula: see text] is called generalized derivation if there exists a unique derivation [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text] In this paper, we investigate the structure of [Formula: see text] and describe the possible forms of generalized derivations of [Formula: see text] that satisfy specific ∗-differential identities. Precisely, we study the following situations: (i) [Formula: see text] (ii) [Formula: see text] (iii) [Formula: see text] (iv) [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text] Moreover, we construct some examples showing that the restrictions imposed in the hypotheses of our theorems are not redundant.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 2413-2426
Author(s):  
Mohd Arif Raza ◽  
◽  
Abdul Nadim Khan ◽  
Husain Alhazmi ◽  

<abstract><p>In this note, we characterize $ b- $generalized derivations which are strong commutative preserving (SCP) on $ \mathscr{R} $. Moreover, we also discuss and characterize $ b- $generalized derivations involving certain $ \ast- $differential/functional identities on rings possessing involution.</p></abstract>


Author(s):  
C. Jaya Subba Reddy ◽  
S. Mallikarjuna Rao ◽  
V. Vijaya Kumar

Let R be a prime ring and d a derivation on R. If is a left generalized derivation on R such that ƒ is centralizing on a left ideal U of R, then R is commutative.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (09) ◽  
pp. 1850163 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mamouni ◽  
B. Nejjar ◽  
L. Oukhtite

In this paper, we investigate commutativity of prime rings [Formula: see text] with involution ∗ of the second kind in which generalized derivations satisfy certain algebraic identities. Some well-known results characterizing commutativity of prime rings have been generalized. Furthermore, we provide an example to show that the restriction imposed on the involution is not superfluous.


2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lahcen Oukhtite ◽  
Omar Ait Zemzami

Abstract The main goal of the present paper is to study some results concerning generalized derivations of prime rings with involution. Moreover, we provide examples to show that the assumed restriction cannot be relaxed.


Author(s):  
H. E. Bell ◽  
M. N. Daif

A mapfof the ringRinto itself is of period 2 iff2x=xfor allx∈R; involutions are much studied examples. We present some commutativity results for semiprime and prime rings with involution, and we study the existence of derivations and generalized derivations of period 2 on prime and semiprime rings.


Author(s):  
Huang Shuliang

LetRbe an associative prime ring,Ua Lie ideal such thatu2∈Ufor allu∈U. An additive functionF:R→Ris called a generalized derivation if there exists a derivationd:R→Rsuch thatF(xy)=F(x)y+xd(y)holds for allx,y∈R. In this paper, we prove thatd=0orU⊆Z(R)if any one of the following conditions holds: (1)d(x)∘F(y)=0, (2)[d(x),F(y)=0], (3) eitherd(x)∘F(y)=x∘yord(x)∘F(y)+x∘y=0, (4) eitherd(x)∘F(y)=[x,y]ord(x)∘F(y)+[x,y]=0, (5) eitherd(x)∘F(y)−xy∈Z(R)ord(x)∘F(y)+xy∈Z(R), (6) either[d(x),F(y)]=[x,y]or[d(x),F(y)]+[x,y]=0, (7) either[d(x),F(y)]=x∘yor[d(x),F(y)]+x∘y=0for allx,y∈U.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document