Centralizing and Commuting Left Generalized Derivations on Prime Rings

Author(s):  
C. Jaya Subba Reddy ◽  
S. Mallikarjuna Rao ◽  
V. Vijaya Kumar

Let R be a prime ring and d a derivation on R. If is a left generalized derivation on R such that ƒ is centralizing on a left ideal U of R, then R is commutative.

Author(s):  
Deepak Kumar ◽  
Bharat Bhushan ◽  
Gurninder S. Sandhu

Let [Formula: see text] be a prime ring with involution ∗ of the second kind. An additive mapping [Formula: see text] is called generalized derivation if there exists a unique derivation [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text] In this paper, we investigate the structure of [Formula: see text] and describe the possible forms of generalized derivations of [Formula: see text] that satisfy specific ∗-differential identities. Precisely, we study the following situations: (i) [Formula: see text] (ii) [Formula: see text] (iii) [Formula: see text] (iv) [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text] Moreover, we construct some examples showing that the restrictions imposed in the hypotheses of our theorems are not redundant.


Author(s):  
Huang Shuliang

LetRbe an associative prime ring,Ua Lie ideal such thatu2∈Ufor allu∈U. An additive functionF:R→Ris called a generalized derivation if there exists a derivationd:R→Rsuch thatF(xy)=F(x)y+xd(y)holds for allx,y∈R. In this paper, we prove thatd=0orU⊆Z(R)if any one of the following conditions holds: (1)d(x)∘F(y)=0, (2)[d(x),F(y)=0], (3) eitherd(x)∘F(y)=x∘yord(x)∘F(y)+x∘y=0, (4) eitherd(x)∘F(y)=[x,y]ord(x)∘F(y)+[x,y]=0, (5) eitherd(x)∘F(y)−xy∈Z(R)ord(x)∘F(y)+xy∈Z(R), (6) either[d(x),F(y)]=[x,y]or[d(x),F(y)]+[x,y]=0, (7) either[d(x),F(y)]=x∘yor[d(x),F(y)]+x∘y=0for allx,y∈U.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Wang

Let R be a prime ring with a nontrivial idempotent. In this paper, we prove that if g is an additive map of R into itself such that xg(y)z = 0 for all x, y, z ∈ R with xy = yz = 0, then g is a generalized derivation. As an application of this result, we show that every local generalized derivation in a prime ring with a nontrivial idempotent is a generalized derivation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Khalil Abu Nawas ◽  
Radwan M. Al-Omary

An additive mapping F: R → R is called a generalized derivation on R if there exists a derivation d: R → R such that F(xy) = xF(y) + d(x)y holds for all x,y ∈ R. It is called a generalized (α,β)−derivation on R if there exists an (α,β)−derivation d: R → R such that the equation F(xy) = F(x)α(y)+β(x)d(y) holds for all x,y ∈ R. In the present paper, we investigate commutativity of a prime ring R, which satisfies certain differential identities on left ideals of R. Moreover some results on commutativity of rings with involutions that satisfy certain identities are proved.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (03) ◽  
pp. 369-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Xu ◽  
Jing Ma ◽  
Fengwen Niu

Let R be a prime ring with extended centroid C, maximal right ring of quotients U, a nonzero ideal I and a generalized derivation δ. Suppose δ(x)n =(ax)n for all x ∈ I, where a ∈ U and n is a fixed positive integer. Then δ(x)=λax for some λ ∈ C. We also prove two generalized versions by replacing I with a nonzero left ideal [Formula: see text] and a noncommutative Lie ideal L, respectively.


2016 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
Akhil Chandra Paul ◽  
Sujoy Chakraborty

Let U be a non-zero square closed Lie ideal of a 2-torsion free prime ring R and f a generalized derivation of R with the associated derivation d of R. If f acts as a homomorphism and as an anti-homomorphism on U, then we prove that d = 0 or U € Z(R), the centre of R.GANIT J. Bangladesh Math. Soc.Vol. 35 (2015) 73-77


2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Scudo ◽  
Abu Zaid Ansari

AbstractLet R be a non-commutative prime ring of characteristic different from 2, U the Utumi quotient ring of R, C the extended centroid of R, L a non-central Lie ideal of R, G a non-zero generalized derivation of R.If [G(u), u](1) R satisfies the standard identity s(2) there exists γ ∈ C such that G(x) = γx for all x ∈ R.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 1850055
Author(s):  
Basudeb Dhara ◽  
Krishna Gopal Pradhan ◽  
Shailesh Kumar Tiwari

Let [Formula: see text] be a noncommutative prime ring with its Utumi ring of quotients [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] the extended centroid of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] a generalized derivation of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] a nonzero ideal of [Formula: see text]. If [Formula: see text] satisfies any one of the following conditions: (i) [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], (ii) [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is a fixed integer, then one of the following holds: (1) there exists [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text]; (2) [Formula: see text] satisfies [Formula: see text] and there exist [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text]; (3) char [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] satisfies [Formula: see text] and there exist [Formula: see text] and an outer derivation [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text].


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
M. Rais Khan ◽  
Deepa Arora ◽  
M. Ali Khan

Let R be a prime ring and F and G be generalized derivations of R with associated derivations d and g respectively. In the present paper, we shall investigate the commutativity of R admitting generalized derivations F and G satisfying any one of the properties: (i) F(x)x = x G(x), (ii) F(x2) = x2 , (iii) [F(x), y] = [x, G(y)], (iv) d(x)F(y) = xy, (v) F([x, y]) = [F(x), y] + [d(y), x] and (vi) F(x ◦ y) = F(x) ◦ y − d(y) ◦ x for all x, y in some appropriate subset of R.


2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Shuliang Huang ◽  
Nadeem Ur Rehman

Let $R$ be a prime ring, $I$ a nonzero ideal of $R$ and $m, n$  fixed positive integers.  If $R$ admits a generalized derivation $F$ associated with a  nonzero derivation $d$ such that $(F([x,y])^{m}=[x,y]_{n}$ for  all $x,y\in I$, then $R$ is commutative. Moreover  we also examine the case when $R$ is a semiprime ring.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document