Competitive equilibrium in two sided matching markets with general utility functions

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Alaei ◽  
Kamal Jain ◽  
Azarakhsh Malekian
2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 638-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Alaei ◽  
Kamal Jain ◽  
Azarakhsh Malekian

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
G. Anello ◽  
F. Rania

We study the existence of general competitive equilibria in economies with agents and goods in a finite number. We show that there exists a Walras competitive equilibrium in all ownership private economies such that, for all consumers, initial endowments do not contain free goods and utility functions are locally Lipschitz quasiconcave. The proof of the existence of competitive equilibria is based on variational methods by applying a theoretical existence result for Generalized Quasi Variational Inequalities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-523
Author(s):  
Jinggong Zhang ◽  
Ken Seng Tan ◽  
Chengguo Weng

AbstractIn this article, we study the problem of optimal index insurance design under an expected utility maximization framework. For general utility functions, we formally prove the existence and uniqueness of optimal contract and develop an effective numerical procedure to derive the optimal solution. For exponential utility and quadratic utility functions, we obtain analytical expression of the optimal indemnity function. Our results show that the indemnity can be a highly nonlinear and even non-monotonic function of the index variable in order to align with the actual loss variable so as to achieve the best reduction in basis risk. Due to the generality of model setup, our proposed method is readily applicable to a variety of insurance applications including index-linked mortality securities, weather index agriculture insurance, and index-based catastrophe insurance. Our method is illustrated by numerical examples where weather index insurance is designed for protection against the adverse rice yield using temperature and precipitation as the underlying indices. Numerical results show that our optimal index insurance significantly outperforms linear-type index insurance contracts in terms of basis risk reduction.


Author(s):  
Mohammad Ghodsi ◽  
Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi ◽  
Masoud Seddighin ◽  
Saeed Seddighin ◽  
Hadi Yami

We study the problem of fair allocation for indivisible goods. We use the maximin share paradigm introduced by Budish [Budish E (2011) The combinatorial assignment problem: Approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes. J. Political Econom. 119(6):1061–1103.] as a measure of fairness. Kurokawa et al. [Kurokawa D, Procaccia AD, Wang J (2018) Fair enough: Guaranteeing approximate maximin shares. J. ACM 65(2):8.] were the first to investigate this fundamental problem in the additive setting. They showed that in delicately constructed examples, not everyone can obtain a utility of at least her maximin value. They mitigated this impossibility result with a beautiful observation: no matter how the utility functions are made, we always can allocate the items to the agents to guarantee each agent’s utility is at least 2/3 of her maximin value. They left open whether this bound can be improved. Our main contribution answers this question in the affirmative. We improve their approximation result to a 3/4 factor guarantee.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
John William Hatfield ◽  
Scott Duke Kominers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document