"@alex, this fixes #9": Analysis of Referencing Patterns in Pull Request Discussions

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (CSCW2) ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Ashish Chopra ◽  
Morgan Mo ◽  
Samuel Dodson ◽  
Ivan Beschastnikh ◽  
Sidney S. Fels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ilyas Azeem ◽  
Sebastiano Panichella ◽  
Andrea Di Sorbo ◽  
Alexander Serebrenik ◽  
Qing Wang
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Zhifang Liao ◽  
Yanbing Li ◽  
Dayu He ◽  
Jinsong Wu ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
pp. 825-825
Author(s):  
Andres Barkil-Oteo

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 5683-5693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhifang Liao ◽  
ZeXuan Wu ◽  
Yanbing Li ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Xiaoping Fan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 196-210
Author(s):  
Jing Jiang ◽  
David Lo ◽  
Jiateng Zheng ◽  
Xin Xia ◽  
Yun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Josh Terrell ◽  
Andrew Kofink ◽  
Justin Middleton ◽  
Clarissa Rainear ◽  
Emerson Murphy-Hill ◽  
...  

Biases against women in the workplace have been documented in a variety of studies. This paper presents the largest study to date on gender bias, where we compare acceptance rates of contributions from men versus women in an open source software community. Surprisingly, our results show that women's contributions tend to be accepted more often than men's. However, women's acceptance rates are higher only when they are not identifiable as women. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document