Physically embodied video snippets supporting collaborative exploration of video material during design sessions

Author(s):  
Tomas Sokoler ◽  
Håkan Edeholt
Author(s):  
Edward English ◽  
Jessica S. B. Newman ◽  
Aubrie Cox Warner ◽  
Bronwyn T. Williams

Author(s):  
Jee Hyun Lee ◽  
Eun Kyoung Yang ◽  
Eun Jee Lee ◽  
Se Yeong Min ◽  
Zhong Yuan Sun ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 192536212110561
Author(s):  
Roberto Scendoni ◽  
Piergiorgio Fedeli ◽  
Nunzia Cannovo ◽  
Mariano Cingolani

According to the Italian legal system, forensic autopsies are performed by a medical doctor specialized in legal medicine, otherwise known as a medicolegal expert (MLE), who has a range of very complex responsibilities. Indeed, the quality of forensic autopsy activity is always questioned in courts of law; incorrect assessments are dangerous because they can jeopardize the validity of a criminal investigation and thus affect the outcome so that a real culprit may be acquitted or an innocent person convicted. Nonconformities also discredit the professionalism of the specialist who performs the autopsy. The work of a MLE implies a series of assignments and duties that should be given constant consideration, but when certain aspects of this activity are underestimated or overlooked, this can lead the expert to make mistakes with irreparable consequences for the judicial investigation. In this article, for the first time, we present a summary of seven known errors related to autopsy activity following death by unnatural causes, with the purpose of alerting MLEs who work under the Italian judicial system to the potential dangers of such errors. These relate to: oversights in autopsy technique, incorrect collection of photographic and video material, unauthorized attendance at the autopsy, missing/mistaken reporting at any stage of the forensic activity, failure to notify the party forensic consultant, using histological or toxicological nonaccredited laboratories for forensic activities, and lack of observance of the chain of custody.


Significance Former Crown Prince Hamzah was placed under house arrest on April 3, as 20 other people were detained. His release of audio and video material that undermined the official position embarrassed the government, and the recent public reconciliation leaves his status unclear. Impacts Despite the aspersions cast on Riyadh, Gulf states will send further financial aid to boost stability and compete for influence. Another government reshuffle and further changes within the security services are likely. Relations between Abdullah and Hamzah will remain troubled, as the latter seeks to remain relevant in case an opportunity presents itself.


2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Blankvoort ◽  
Muzeyyen Arslan ◽  
Ani Tonoyan ◽  
Ahmad Q. Damour ◽  
Liliane Mpabanzi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document