Helical CT Evaluation of the Perirenal Space and Its Boundaries: A Cadaveric Study

Radiology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 218 (3) ◽  
pp. 659-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Thornton ◽  
Scantha S. Kandiah ◽  
William S. Monkhouse ◽  
Michael J. Lee
2020 ◽  
pp. 175319342097388
Author(s):  
Lionel Athlani ◽  
Aymeric Rauch ◽  
Nicolas Weber ◽  
Alain Blum ◽  
Gilles Dautel ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umesh Sharma ◽  
Sangeet Ghai ◽  
Shashi Bala Paul ◽  
Manpreet Singh Gulati ◽  
V.K. Bahl ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 821-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip T. Guillen ◽  
Ryan G. Knopper ◽  
Jared Kroger ◽  
Nathaniel D. Wycliffe ◽  
Olumide A. Danisa ◽  
...  

Object The authors undertook an independent, non–industry funded cadaveric study to evaluate the efficacy of a pedicle-probing device, which uses impedance measurement to warn of impending and actual pedicle screw breach. Methods A previously validated fresh-frozen cadaver model (saline-soaked spine) was used. Individuals at 3 levels of training (attending spine surgeon, orthopedic surgery resident, and medical student) used a cannulated pedicle-probing device to cannulate each of the levels between T-2 and S-1. Each pedicle was cannulated freehand using 2 approaches: 1) a standard trajectory through the middle of the pedicle, and 2) a medial trajectory aimed to breach the medial wall of the pedicle. A 16-slice helical CT scanner was used. The images were interpreted and analyzed by 2 orthopedic spine surgeons and a neuroradiologist. Results The sensitivity of the pedicle probe to detect impending breach or breach of 4 mm or less was 90.06%. The sensitivity in detecting medial wall breach was 95.8%. The positive predictive value was 87.1%. The device detected medial breach more often than lateral breach. Conclusions This study showed that this pedicle-probing device could reasonably be used to detect impending breach and actual breach of 4 mm or less. Medial breach was detected better than lateral breach. Use of the pedicle probe may improve patient safety.


2009 ◽  
Vol 192 (4) ◽  
pp. 902-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
In Joon Lee ◽  
Jeong Min Lee ◽  
Se Hyung Kim ◽  
Samuel Chang ◽  
Joon Koo Han ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 2134-2140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-France Bellin ◽  
Rapha�lle Renard-Penna ◽  
Pierre Conort ◽  
Anne Bissery ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Meric ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 184 (4) ◽  
pp. 1136-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxing Yu ◽  
Ann S. Fulcher ◽  
Mary Ann Turner ◽  
Robert A. Halvorsen

1997 ◽  
Vol 169 (5) ◽  
pp. 1325-1330 ◽  
Author(s):  
J F Platt ◽  
J H Ellis ◽  
M Korobkin ◽  
K Reige

Radiology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 239 (2) ◽  
pp. 576-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine Remy-Jardin ◽  
Philippe Dumont ◽  
Pierre-Yves Brillet ◽  
Philippe Dupuis ◽  
Alain Duhamel ◽  
...  

Radiographics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 725-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce A. Urban ◽  
Elliot K. Fishman

1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. Urban ◽  
Charlene A. Curry ◽  
Elliot K. Fishman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document