scholarly journals Improving Universal Protocol Performance in Radiology through Implementation of a Standardized Time-out

Radiographics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 1182-1187
Author(s):  
James H. Boyum ◽  
Ashley S. Rosier ◽  
Laura C. Tibor ◽  
Mara A. Turner ◽  
Amberly R. Hess ◽  
...  
CytoJournal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Momin T Siddiqui

The adherence to the principles of the Universal Protocol for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure and wrong person surgical or invasive procedures is a requirement for all Joint Commission accredited organizations. Fine needle aspirations are considered invasive procedures, and cytopathologists performing this procedure need to be cognizant and compliant with the requirements of this Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) Protocol. This article gives background perspective on the development of the Universal Protocol. It also elaborates the JCAHO National Patients Safety Goals regarding the performance of fine needle aspirations. The compliance with the Universal Protocol for performance of fine needle aspirations is now mandated for all cytopathologists who perform fine needle aspirations and this present paper provides a guideline for fulfilling the requirements of the Universal Protocol for practicing cytopathologists.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  
Kristina Taylor ◽  
Jen Dinicola ◽  
Wowie Parduba

Hand ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyson K. Cobb

Background Wrong site surgery is estimated to occur 40 times per week in hospitals and clinics in USA. The universal protocol was implemented by the joint commission board of commissioners to address wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong person surgery. Discussion The universal protocol has three principal components: preoperative verification, marking of the operative site, and a time-out. Despite this organized approach to this problem, current data do not demonstrate any progress. In fact some data suggest that the problem may be getting worse. It is apparent that a process relying on surgeon and surgical team memory is doomed to ultimate failure. Recommendations are made for a more in depth checklist process based on the recommendations of the World Health Organization, reports in the literature of known areas of weakness in the current process, and personal experience in hopes of establishing a more bullet proof system to avoid wrong site procedure.


1979 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 695-696
Author(s):  
PETER SUEDFELD
Keyword(s):  

1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol M. Werner

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve A. Nida ◽  
Arona R. Muckenfuss ◽  
D. Michelle Turner ◽  
Kipling D. Williams

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document