Electrical control of canine jejunal propulsion

1981 ◽  
Vol 240 (5) ◽  
pp. G355-G360 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Sarr ◽  
K. A. Kelly ◽  
H. E. Gladen

We wondered whether the direction of propagation of intestinal pacesetter potentials determines the direction of movement of intestinal content. In six dogs, electrodes for pacing were implanted near each end of an 80-cm isolated jejunal loop, and a cannula was positioned at the middle of the loop for intraluminal insertion of solids and/or liquids. After recovery and during fasting, 50 nylon spheres (2 mm diam) always emptied from the distal stoma regardless of the direction of pacing. In contrast, 150 mM NaCl, given alone at 2.8 ml/min or with spheres, emptied from the distal stoma during forward pacing and from the proximal stoma during backward pacing. Spheres given with the liquid emptied from the distal stoma during forward pacing, but during backward pacing, the site of emptying varied among dogs. Neither pacing nor spheres altered jejunal interdigestive myoelectric cycles, but the perfusate abolished the cycles and resulted in a noncyclic pattern of jejunal action potentials. We concluded that the direction of pacesetter potential propagation determined the direction of liquid transit. Direction of solid transit depended, in part, on other mechanisms.

1990 ◽  
Vol 259 (6) ◽  
pp. G928-G933
Author(s):  
N. J. Soper ◽  
K. L. Geisler ◽  
M. G. Sarr ◽  
K. A. Kelly ◽  
A. R. Zinsmeister

The aim of this study was to determine what factors influence the direction of movement of canine jejunal chyme. In four dogs, pacing electrodes were implanted near each end of a 50-cm jejunal Vella loop, while recording electrodes and intraluminal pressure catheters were spaced along the loop. After recovery, the loop was perfused from either the proximal stoma (forward flow) or the distal stoma (reversed flow), and effluent was collected from the nonperfused stoma. The pacesetter potentials were paced electrically in a forward (aborad) or a reverse (orad) direction. During control conditions (forward flow-forward pacing), the mean transit time of liquids was 2.6 +/- 0.1 min (mean +/- SE) and the static volume of the loop was 8.8 +/- 0.3 ml. Reversing both direction of flow and direction of pacesetter potential propagation slowed transit (4.4 +/- 0.4 min; P less than 0.05) and increased loop volume (16.0 +/- 1.0 ml; P less than 0.01). Reversing flow with forward pacing resulted in even slower transit (7.5 +/- 1.2 min; P less than 0.05), maintained a large volume (33 +/- 10 ml), and increased basal pressure in the loop from -1.2 +/- 1.7 (control) to 2.3 +/- 1.6 mmHg (P less than 0.05). These observations suggest that the direction of propagation of jejunal pacesetter potentials influences the direction of movement of jejunal chyme but that other factors have a role as well.


1987 ◽  
Vol 252 (4) ◽  
pp. G548-G553 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bjorck ◽  
K. A. Kelly ◽  
S. F. Phillips

Electrical pacing enhances absorption from the canine small bowel, but the mechanism of this effect is unknown. To explore the mechanism, conscious dogs with two Vella loops, a proximal jejunal and a distal ileal, each 50 cm long, were studied. Pacing the jejunal loop with 15–18 pulses/min entrained the pacesetter potentials of the jejunal loop and increased water, sodium, and glucose absorption from the jejunal loop. Jejunal pacing also increased water absorption from the unpaced, ileal loop. Conversely, ileal pacing did not entrain the ileal loop or enhance absorption from the ileal loop. However, it did enhance water absorption in the unpaced jejunal loop. After alpha-blockade with phentolamine or celiac and superior mesenteric ganglionectomy, jejunal pacing did not increase jejunal or ileal absorption. In contrast, after beta-blockade with propranolol, pacing still enhanced jejunal absorption in three out of four dogs. Vagotomy alone enhanced jejunal but not ileal absorption, but the enhancement was not further increased by pacing. In conclusion, electrical pacing of the small bowel elicited a local and distant increase in net water absorption; the effect was mediated in part by an alpha-adrenergic mechanism.


1995 ◽  
Vol 268 (6) ◽  
pp. G959-G967
Author(s):  
J. J. Cullen ◽  
J. C. Eagon ◽  
F. S. Hould ◽  
R. B. Hanson ◽  
K. A. Kelly

The hypothesis was that orally moving pacesetter potentials distal to a site of jejunal transection and anastomosis would slow transit through jejunum containing them and that reoperation with excision of bowel containing these pacesetter potentials would restore transit to the control. In six conscious dogs with jejunal serosal electrodes for recording myoelectric activity and a jejunal perfusion/aspiration catheter for measuring transit, jejunal pacesetter potential frequency decreased distal to a midjejunal transection and anastomosis from 18.7 +/- 0.3 (SE) cycles/min (cpm) proximal to the site to 14.4 +/- 0.6 cpm distal to the site (P < 0.05). In addition, orally propagating pacesetter potentials occurred > 25% of the time in a 37 +/- 7 cm length of bowel distal to the site during fasting and after feeding. Transit through the segment with the orally moving pacesetter potentials was slowed during feeding (half time before and after transection, 7.7 +/- 1.1 and 13 +/- 2.0 min, respectively, P < 0.05). Resection of the segment with the abnormal pacesetter potentials shortened the length of bowel containing them to 24 +/- 2 cm (P > 0.05) and restored transit to the control. In conclusion, orally moving pacesetter potentials distal to a canine jejunal transection and anastomosis slowed transit through the segment of bowel containing them. Resection of the segment restored transit to the control.


1991 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 601-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Zawadzki ◽  
Eric Davies ◽  
Halina Dziubinska ◽  
Kazimierz Trebacz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document