Nerve conduction velocity and refractory period in peripheral vascular disease

1962 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 837-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osvaldo Miglietta ◽  
Milton Lowenthal

The conduction velocity and the residual latency of the common peroneal nerve and the refractory period of the extensor digitorum brevis were measured in a group of patients with occlusive vascular disease of the lower extremity, and compared with those of a group of normal and elderly subjects. The results indicate that motor nerve and muscle are affected in peripheral arteriosclerosis. The conduction velocity showed a decrease of 16.9% for the patient group and of 6.7% for the elderly normal subjects when compared to the young group. The refractory period of the extensor digitorum brevis, after 10 min of provoked ischemia and 2/sec stimulation, increased 105.1% in the patient group, 17.8% in the young, and 28.9% in the elderly group. Correlations between the electrical responses and the state of muscle and nerve as influenced by chronic arteriopathy are discussed. Submitted on October 26, 1961

1987 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 1655-1664 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Borg ◽  
L Edstrom ◽  
L Bjerkenstedt ◽  
F A Wiesel ◽  
L Farde ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Aird ◽  
R. D. G. Webb ◽  
J. Hoare

Conduction velocity, absolute refractory period, and subnormal conduction period measures of the right ulnar motor nerve were obtained during a simple reaction time task. 6 young, healthy, right-arm dominant male subjects were tested following 30 min. exposure in ambient (20°C) and hot (36°C) room air conditions. Motor and premotor components of fractionated reaction time were tested on the same arm. Oral, right forearm skin and a four-site mean skin temperature were monitored. During heat exposure, forearm skin temperature increased 4.7°C and mean skin temperature 2.9°C. Oral temperature did not alter. Conduction velocity increased 11.4%, absolute refractory period decreased 22.7%, and subnormal conduction period decreased 14.1% in the hot condition. Concomitantly, a 5.2% increase in premotor reaction time and 12.2% decrease in motor reaction time were observed. Total RT did not alter significantly. It was concluded that different component parts of reaction time were differentially influenced by exposure to heat.


PM&R ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh Levin ◽  
Anita Lowe ◽  
Lyndly Tamura ◽  
Emily Miller ◽  
Jayme Koltsov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document