Effect of positive nasal pressure on upper airway pressure-flow relationships

1989 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 1626-1634 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Schwartz ◽  
P. L. Smith ◽  
R. A. Wise ◽  
I. Bankman ◽  
S. Permutt

To determine the influence of changes in nasal pressure (Pn) on airflow mechanics in the upper airway, we examined the effect of elevations in Pn on upper airway resistance and critical pressure (Pcrit) during stage I/II sleep in six patients with obstructive sleep apnea. When Pn was elevated above a Pcrit, periodic occlusions of the upper airway were eliminated and inspiratory airflow limitation was demonstrated by the finding that inspiratory airflow (VI) became maximal (VImax) and independent of fluctuations in hypopharyngeal pressure (Php) when Php fell below a specific Php (Php′). As Pn was elevated, VI vs. Php demonstrated 1) marked decreases in early and late inspiratory resistances from 75.9 +/- 34.7 and 54.6 +/- 19.0 to 8.0 +/- 1.7 and 7.6 +/- 1.6 cmH2O.l-1.s (P less than 0.05), respectively, and 2) increases in early and late inspiratory Php′ to levels that exceeded Pcrit by 3.0 +/- 0.6 and 3.1 +/- 0.7 cmH2O, respectively, at the highest level of Pn applied (P less than 0.01). This latter finding suggests that elevations in Pn result in increases in Pcrit. We suggest that elevations in Pn produce distinct alterations in upper airway resistance and collapsibility, which may influence oppositely the level of airflow through the upper airway during sleep.

1996 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 643-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Schwartz ◽  
D. W. Eisele ◽  
A. Hari ◽  
R. Testerman ◽  
D. Erickson ◽  
...  

The influence of lingual muscle activity on airflow dynamics in the upper airway was examined in nine patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Muscles that retract the tongue (hyoglossus and styloglossus) and protrude the tongue (genioglossus) were selectively stimulated electrically during sleep with fine wire electrodes placed intramuscularly transorally. We confirmed that stimulation with 50 Hz and 40-microseconds pulse duration did not elicit changes in electroencephalographic patterns or heart rate or alter airflow after the stimulation burst had ceased. The highest stimulus intensity that did not arouse patients from sleep was then utilized to examine the effect of lingual muscle recruitment on airflow dynamics during steady-state periods of inspiratory airflow limitation. When applying a stimulus burst during single inspirations, maximal inspiratory airflow decreased by 239 +/- 177 ml/s (P < 0.05) during retractor stimulation, whereas maximal inspiratory airflow increased by 217 +/- 93 ml/s during protrusor stimulation (P < 0.001) compared with breaths immediately before and after the stimulated breath. When consecutive inspirations were stimulated repeatedly, protrusor stimulation decreased the frequency of obstructive breathing episodes in four patients breathing at 3.9 +/- 3.4 (SD) cmH2O nasal pressure. The findings suggest that stimulation of the lingual muscles can increase or decrease airflow depending on the specific muscles stimulated without arousing patients from sleep.


2006 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. S110-S111
Author(s):  
Vinicius Suguri ◽  
Luiz Carlos Gregorio ◽  
Dalva Poyares ◽  
Christian Guillemninault ◽  
Sergio Tufik

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document