Vestibular reflexes in neck and forelimb muscles evoked by roll tilt.

1981 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
R H Schor ◽  
A D Miller
2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 923-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie M. Warburton ◽  
Philip W. Bateman ◽  
Patricia Anne Fleming

2007 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. S94
Author(s):  
Sergey Kurkin ◽  
Teppei Akao ◽  
Junko Fukushima ◽  
Kikuro Fukushima

1986 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. S61
Author(s):  
Ikuko Kogure ◽  
V. Reggie Edgerton ◽  
Tatsu Fuwa ◽  
Muneo Shimamura
Keyword(s):  

1986 ◽  
Vol 379 (1) ◽  
pp. 192-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.R. Botterman ◽  
T.C. Cope
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1915-1927 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Griffin ◽  
H. M. Hudson ◽  
A. Belhaj-Saif ◽  
P. D. Cheney

2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 3187-3197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marissa J. Rosenberg ◽  
Raquel C. Galvan-Garza ◽  
Torin K. Clark ◽  
David P. Sherwood ◽  
Laurence R. Young ◽  
...  

Precise motion control is critical to human survival on Earth and in space. Motion sensation is inherently imprecise, and the functional implications of this imprecision are not well understood. We studied a “vestibular” manual control task in which subjects attempted to keep themselves upright with a rotational hand controller (i.e., joystick) to null out pseudorandom, roll-tilt motion disturbances of their chair in the dark. Our first objective was to study the relationship between intersubject differences in manual control performance and sensory precision, determined by measuring vestibular perceptual thresholds. Our second objective was to examine the influence of altered gravity on manual control performance. Subjects performed the manual control task while supine during short-radius centrifugation, with roll tilts occurring relative to centripetal accelerations of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.33 GC (1 GC = 9.81 m/s2). Roll-tilt vestibular precision was quantified with roll-tilt vestibular direction-recognition perceptual thresholds, the minimum movement that one can reliably distinguish as leftward vs. rightward. A significant intersubject correlation was found between manual control performance (defined as the standard deviation of chair tilt) and thresholds, consistent with sensory imprecision negatively affecting functional precision. Furthermore, compared with 1.0 GC manual control was more precise in 1.33 GC (−18.3%, P = 0.005) and less precise in 0.5 GC (+39.6%, P < 0.001). The decrement in manual control performance observed in 0.5 GC and in subjects with high thresholds suggests potential risk factors for piloting and locomotion, both on Earth and during human exploration missions to the moon (0.16 G) and Mars (0.38 G). NEW & NOTEWORTHY The functional implications of imprecise motion sensation are not well understood. We found a significant correlation between subjects’ vestibular perceptual thresholds and performance in a manual control task (using a joystick to keep their chair upright), consistent with sensory imprecision negatively affecting functional precision. Furthermore, using an altered-gravity centrifuge configuration, we found that manual control precision was improved in “hypergravity” and degraded in “hypogravity.” These results have potential relevance for postural control, aviation, and spaceflight.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 4068-4074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhui Zhang ◽  
Hongyan Zhang ◽  
Lijun Ding ◽  
Hailu Zhang ◽  
Pengli Zhang ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 390-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. H. Zupan ◽  
D. M. Merfeld

Sensory systems often provide ambiguous information. For example, otolith organs measure gravito-inertial force (GIF), the sum of gravitational force and inertial force due to linear acceleration. However, according to Einstein's equivalence principle, a change in gravitational force due to tilt is indistinguishable from a change in inertial force due to translation. Therefore the central nervous system (CNS) must use other sensory cues to distinguish tilt from translation. For example, the CNS might use dynamic visual cues indicating rotation to help determine the orientation of gravity (tilt). This, in turn, might influence the neural processes that estimate linear acceleration, since the CNS might estimate gravity and linear acceleration such that the difference between these estimates matches the measured GIF. Depending on specific sensory information inflow, inaccurate estimates of gravity and linear acceleration can occur. Specifically, we predict that illusory tilt caused by roll optokinetic cues should lead to a horizontal vestibuloocular reflex compensatory for an interaural estimate of linear acceleration, even in the absence of actual linear acceleration. To investigate these predictions, we measured eye movements binocularly using infrared video methods in 17 subjects during and after optokinetic stimulation about the subject's nasooccipital (roll) axis (60°/s, clockwise or counterclockwise). The optokinetic stimulation was applied for 60 s followed by 30 s in darkness. We simultaneously measured subjective roll tilt using a somatosensory bar. Each subject was tested in three different orientations: upright, pitched forward 10°, and pitched backward 10°. Five subjects reported significant subjective roll tilt (>10°) in directions consistent with the direction of the optokinetic stimulation. In addition to torsional optokinetic nystagmus and afternystagmus, we measured a horizontal nystagmus to the right during and following clockwise (CW) stimulation and to the left during and following counterclockwise (CCW) stimulation. These measurements match predictions that subjective tilt in the absence of real tilt should induce a nonzero estimate of interaural linear acceleration and, therefore, a horizontal eye response. Furthermore, as predicted, the horizontal response in the dark was larger for Tilters ( n = 5) than for Non-Tilters ( n= 12).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document