scholarly journals Target Detection Using Nonsingular Approximations for a Singular Covariance Matrix

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nir Gorelik ◽  
Dan Blumberg ◽  
Stanley R. Rotman ◽  
Dirk Borghys

Accurate covariance matrix estimation for high-dimensional data can be a difficult problem. A good approximation of the covariance matrix needs in most cases a prohibitively large number of pixels, that is, pixels from a stationary section of the image whose number is greater than several times the number of bands. Estimating the covariance matrix with a number of pixels that is on the order of the number of bands or less will cause not only a bad estimation of the covariance matrix but also a singular covariance matrix which cannot be inverted. In this paper we will investigate two methods to give a sufficient approximation for the covariance matrix while only using a small number of neighboring pixels. The first is the quasilocal covariance matrix (QLRX) that uses the variance of the global covariance instead of the variances that are too small and cause a singular covariance. The second method is sparse matrix transform (SMT) that performs a set of K-givens rotations to estimate the covariance matrix. We will compare results from target acquisition that are based on both of these methods. An improvement for the SMT algorithm is suggested.










2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zongliang Hu ◽  
Kai Dong ◽  
Wenlin Dai ◽  
Tiejun Tong

Abstract The determinant of the covariance matrix for high-dimensional data plays an important role in statistical inference and decision. It has many real applications including statistical tests and information theory. Due to the statistical and computational challenges with high dimensionality, little work has been proposed in the literature for estimating the determinant of high-dimensional covariance matrix. In this paper, we estimate the determinant of the covariance matrix using some recent proposals for estimating high-dimensional covariance matrix. Specifically, we consider a total of eight covariance matrix estimation methods for comparison. Through extensive simulation studies, we explore and summarize some interesting comparison results among all compared methods. We also provide practical guidelines based on the sample size, the dimension, and the correlation of the data set for estimating the determinant of high-dimensional covariance matrix. Finally, from a perspective of the loss function, the comparison study in this paper may also serve as a proxy to assess the performance of the covariance matrix estimation.



2008 ◽  
Vol 147 (1) ◽  
pp. 186-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianqing Fan ◽  
Yingying Fan ◽  
Jinchi Lv


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document