scholarly journals A Shallow Angle Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach Reduces the Rate of Posterior Wall Injuries in Central Venous Catheterization: A Simulation Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunitaro Watanabe ◽  
Joho Tokumine ◽  
Alan Kawarai Lefor ◽  
Akira Motoyasu ◽  
Kumi Moriyama ◽  
...  

The short-axis out-of-plane approach (SAX-OOP) is commonly used in ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization. However, this approach has a risk of posterior vein wall injuries. The authors hypothesized that a shallow angle of approach may reduce the rate of posterior wall injuries compared with the conventional steep angle approach. The present study aimed to evaluate whether a difference in the angle of approach of the needle affects the rate of posterior wall injuries. The present study was a randomized crossover-controlled trial involving 40 medical residents, conducted in the clinical training center at a hospital with a residency program. The primary outcome measure was the rate of posterior vessel wall injuries. Subjects received a didactic lecture during which the instructors taught three SAX-OOP techniques including the conventional free-hand method (procedure C), a needle navigation system (procedure N), and a shallow puncture angle using a guidance system (procedure S). Participants were trained in these approaches under supervision and each technique tested in a simulation environment. Thirty-four of 40 residents had no previous experience with central venous catheterization and were included in the final analysis. The rate of posterior vessel wall injuries in procedure S (9%) was significantly lower than using the other approaches (procedure C, 53%; procedure N, 41%). In conclusion, a shallow angle of approach using the SAX-OOP technique resulted in significantly fewer posterior vein wall injuries in central venous catheterization compared with steep angle techniques.

2017 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49
Author(s):  
Darko Sazdov ◽  
Marija Jovanovski Srceva ◽  
Zorka Nikolova Todorova

Abstract Introduction. Central venous catheterization of the subclavian vein can be achieved with a landmark and an ultrasound-guided method. Using ultrasound the vein can be catheterized with a long axis in plane or a short axis out of plane approach and a combined approach. The aim of the study was to compare the success, average number of attempts and mechanical complication rate between the landmark and the combined ultrasound-guided method. Methods. A total of 162 adult patients from the Intensive Care Unit at Clinical Hospital Acibadem-Sistina, Skopje were included in this prospective study. Patients randomized in the examined group (n=71) were catheterized with real-time ultrasound guidance with a combined short axis out of plane and long axis in plane method. Patients randomized in the control group (n=91) were catheterized with the landmark method. Subclavian vein was catheterized in both groups. Overall success, success on first attempt, number of attempts and complications at the moment of catheterization were the main outcome measures. Results. Catheterization using the landmark method was successful in 94.5% of patients, 65.9% of which during the first attempt. Cannulation using real-time ultrasound guidance was successful in all patients with a first pas success of 83.1%. The complication rate in the ultrasound group was 2.82% and 16.5% in the landmark group (p=0.004404). Conclusion. Real-time ultrasound guidance with a combined short axis out of plane and long axis in plane approach improves success, decreases number of attempts, and reduces mechanical complications rate.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 789-793
Author(s):  
Toshinori Horiuchi ◽  
Chie Okuda ◽  
Naoko Kurita ◽  
Ayako Yamaguchi ◽  
Kazuhiko Kitagawa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110637
Author(s):  
Nicolas Boulet ◽  
Xavier Bobbia ◽  
Antoine Gavoille ◽  
Benjamin Louart ◽  
Jean Yves Lefrant ◽  
...  

Background: Real-time ultrasound (US) guidance facilitates central venous catheterization in intensive care unit (ICU). New magnetic needle-pilot devices could improve efficiency and safety of central venous catheterization. This simulation trial was aimed at comparing venipuncture with a new needle-pilot device to conventional US technique. Methods: In a prospective, randomized, simulation trial, 51 ICU physicians and residents cannulated the right axillary vein of a human torso mannequin with standard US guidance and with a needle-pilot system, in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the time from skin puncture to successful venous cannulation. The secondary outcomes were the number of skin punctures, the number of posterior wall puncture of the axillary vein, the number of arterial punctures, the number of needle redirections, the failure rate, and the operator comfort. Results: Time to successful cannulation was shorter with needle-pilot US-guided technique (22 s (interquartile range (IQR) = 16–42) vs 25 s (IQR = 19–128); median of difference (MOD) = −9 s (95%-confidence interval (CI) −5, −22), p < 0.001). The rates of skin punctures, posterior wall puncture of axillary vein, and needle redirections were also lower ( p < 0.01). Comfort was higher in needle-pilot US-guided group on a 11-points numeric scale (8 (IQR = 8–9) vs 6 (IQR = 6–8), p < 0.001). Conclusions: In a simulation model, US-guided axillary vein catheterization with a needle-pilot device was associated with a shorter time of successful cannulation and a decrease in numbers of skin punctures and complications. The results plea for investigating clinical performance of this new device.


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 832-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jody A. Vogel ◽  
Jason S. Haukoos ◽  
Catherine L. Erickson ◽  
Michael M. Liao ◽  
Jonathan Theoret ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer G. Wilson ◽  
Kristin M. Berona ◽  
John C. Stein ◽  
Ralph Wang

Author(s):  
Jessica M. Gonzalez-Vargas ◽  
Dailen C. Brown ◽  
Jason Z. Moore ◽  
David C. Han ◽  
Elizabeth H. Sinz ◽  
...  

The Dynamic Haptic Robotic Trainer (DHRT) was developed to minimize the up to 39% of adverse effects experienced by patients during Central Venous Catheterization (CVC) by standardizing CVC training, and provide automated assessments of performance. Specifically, this system was developed to replace manikin trainers that only simulate one patient anatomy and require a trained preceptor to evaluate the trainees’ performance. While the DHRT system provides automated feedback, the utility of this system with real-world scenarios and expertise has yet to be thoroughly investigated. Thus, the current study was developed to determine the validity of the current objective assessment metrics incorporated in the DHRT system through expert interviews. The main findings from this study are that experts do agree on perceptions of patient case difficulty, and that characterizations of patient case difficulty is based on anatomical characteristics, multiple needle insertions, and prior catheterization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document