Abstract 2777: Optimal Expansion of the Stent is a Major Contributor to the Neointimal Coverage Following Sirolimus-eluting Stent Implantation: A Combined Study of Angioscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fusako Sera ◽  
Jun-ichi Kotani ◽  
Masaki Awata ◽  
Shinsuke Nanto ◽  
Masaaki Uematsu ◽  
...  

Background: Although sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) has significantly reduced in-stent restenosis by inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia, insufficient neointimal coverage after stenting may result in adverse outcomes. Determinants of neointimal coverage following SES, however, are poorly understood. Methods: We evaluated 28 SES lesions using both angioscopy and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Degree of neointimal coverage was judged by angioscopy at follow-up (11 ± 6 months): complete/incomplete coverage, based on whether the stent struts were embedded by the neointima. Minimal stent area (MSA), external elastic membrane (EEM), lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) and plaque burden (EEM minus lumen/EEM CSA) were measured by IVUS at stent implantation. Both proximal and distal references were used. Stent expansion was assessed by stent expansion index (SEI) as MSA/reference EEM CSA. Under-expansion was defined as SEI < 0.4. Incomplete apposition was defined as the lack of contact between any strut and the underlying vessel wall. Results: Complete coverage was identified in 10 (36%), and incomplete coverage in 18 (64%). Time from the stenting to angioscopy (10 ± 5 versus 11 ± 7 months, p=0.8) as well as the lesion and procedural characteristics was similar between the complete/incomplete coverage groups. IVUS parameters were also similar, except for the final MSA (7.0±1.8mm 2 in complete versus 5.3±1.9mm 2 in incomplete , p=0.02) and lumen CSA at the distal reference site (6.1±1.4mm 2 in complete versus 4.9 ±1.2mm 2 in incomplete , p= 0.02). The frequency of incomplete apposition was similar between the groups (20% in complete versus 39% in incomplete , P= 0.4); however, SEI was significantly larger in the complete coverage than in the incomplete coverage group (0.52 ± 0.11 versus 0.39 ± 0.09, p=0.002). Stent under-expansion was identified only in 2 (20%) of the complete coverage, as compared to 67% of the incomplete coverage group (P=0.046). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, large SEI was strongly associated with complete neointimal coverage (P=0.04). Conclusion: Optimal expansion of the stent is a major contributor to the complete neointimal coverage following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fusako Sera ◽  
Masaaki Uematsu ◽  
Jun-ichi Kotani ◽  
Masaki Awata ◽  
Takakazu Morozumi ◽  
...  

Background: Although sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) has significantly reduced in-stent restenosis, insufficient neointimal coverage may result in adverse outcomes. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided percutaneous coronary intervention improves the patency of bare-metal stents at follow-up. IVUS guidance at the time of SES implantation may also optimize neointimal coverage following stenting. Methods: We evaluated 55 SES implanted lesions using both angioscopy and IVUS at follow-up (12±7 months). The lesions were divided into two groups: IVUS guided implantation (group I, n=40); angiography alone (group A, n=15). Neointimal coverage was classified into 4 grades by angioscopy: no coverage ( G0 ); struts bulged into the lumen, but were covered and still translucently visible ( G1 ); struts were visible, but not clear ( G2 ); and struts were embedded and invisible ( G3 ). Minimal stent area (MSA), external elastic membrane (EEM), lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) and plaque burden were measured by IVUS at follow up. Both proximal and distal references were used. Stent expansion was assessed by stent expansion index (SEI) = MSA/reference EEM CSA. Results: Lesion and procedural characteristics were similar between the groups both at stent implantation and at follow-up. Although the post-procedural quantitative angiographic data were not different between the groups, distribution of the angioscopic grades of neointimal coverage at follow-up were significantly different (group A = 1.0±0.5 grades versus group I = 1.5±0.6 grades, p=0.01). IVUS measurements at follow up showed larger plaque burden at the proximal reference sites (54±12% versus 46±9%, p=0.02) and smaller SEI (0.35±0.09 versus 0.46±0.10, p=0.001) in group A than in group I. Conclusions: IVUS guidance at the time of SES implantation may modify angioscopic grades of the neointimal coverage, possibly optimizing neointimal coverage and preventing thrombosis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Wook Nam ◽  
Kwon-Bae Kim ◽  
Seung-Ho Hur ◽  
Yun-Kyeong Cho ◽  
Hyung Seop Kim ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 96 (10) ◽  
pp. 1404-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Kaneda ◽  
Junya Ako ◽  
Yasuhiro Honda ◽  
Mitsuyasu Terashima ◽  
Yoshihiro Morino ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 96 (9) ◽  
pp. 1237-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Kaneda ◽  
Tomomi Koizumi ◽  
Junya Ako ◽  
Mitsuyasu Terashima ◽  
Yoshihiro Morino ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document