Late Incomplete Stent Apposition After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
J. Ako ◽  
Y. Morino ◽  
Y. Honda
Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fusako Sera ◽  
Masaaki Uematsu ◽  
Jun-ichi Kotani ◽  
Masaki Awata ◽  
Takakazu Morozumi ◽  
...  

Background: Although sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) has significantly reduced in-stent restenosis, insufficient neointimal coverage may result in adverse outcomes. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided percutaneous coronary intervention improves the patency of bare-metal stents at follow-up. IVUS guidance at the time of SES implantation may also optimize neointimal coverage following stenting. Methods: We evaluated 55 SES implanted lesions using both angioscopy and IVUS at follow-up (12±7 months). The lesions were divided into two groups: IVUS guided implantation (group I, n=40); angiography alone (group A, n=15). Neointimal coverage was classified into 4 grades by angioscopy: no coverage ( G0 ); struts bulged into the lumen, but were covered and still translucently visible ( G1 ); struts were visible, but not clear ( G2 ); and struts were embedded and invisible ( G3 ). Minimal stent area (MSA), external elastic membrane (EEM), lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) and plaque burden were measured by IVUS at follow up. Both proximal and distal references were used. Stent expansion was assessed by stent expansion index (SEI) = MSA/reference EEM CSA. Results: Lesion and procedural characteristics were similar between the groups both at stent implantation and at follow-up. Although the post-procedural quantitative angiographic data were not different between the groups, distribution of the angioscopic grades of neointimal coverage at follow-up were significantly different (group A = 1.0±0.5 grades versus group I = 1.5±0.6 grades, p=0.01). IVUS measurements at follow up showed larger plaque burden at the proximal reference sites (54±12% versus 46±9%, p=0.02) and smaller SEI (0.35±0.09 versus 0.46±0.10, p=0.001) in group A than in group I. Conclusions: IVUS guidance at the time of SES implantation may modify angioscopic grades of the neointimal coverage, possibly optimizing neointimal coverage and preventing thrombosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document