scholarly journals The Impact of Preoperative Thrombolysis on Long-Term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Circulation ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 112 (9_supplement) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis K. Toumpoulis ◽  
Constantine E. Anagnostopoulos ◽  
Demosthenes G. Katritsis ◽  
Joseph J. DeRose ◽  
Daniel G. Swistel

Background— Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is frequently used after thrombolytic therapy. However, there is little information regarding long-term survival in this setting. The purpose of the present study was to compare the long-term survival of patients subjected to CABG after thrombolysis to those without thrombolysis. Methods and Results— We studied 3760 consecutive patients with isolated CABG between 1992 and 2002. CABG patients without thrombolysis were compared with those who were treated with thrombolysis within 7 days before CABG. Groups were compared by Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier survival plots. The propensity for thrombolysis was determined by logistic regression analysis, and each patient with thrombolysis was then matched to 5 patients without thrombolysis. One hundred ninety-six patients (5.2%) were treated with thrombolysis. Patients with thrombolysis were more likely to be male, younger, and with higher rates of unstable angina, emergency operation, recent or transmural myocardial infarction, preoperative intraaortic balloon pump, hemodynamic instability, shock, intravenous nitroglycerine, left-ventricular hypertrophy, sustained ventricular arrhythmia, and higher EuroSCORE. There were no differences in early outcome between matched groups, but the 5-year actuarial survival was higher in patients with thrombolysis (90.3±2.2% versus 78.5±1.6%; P =0.0007). After adjustment for all factors, the hazard ratio of long-term mortality for patients with thrombolysis was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.81; P =0.003) and, if deaths during the first 12 months were excluded, 0.46 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.76; P =0.003). Conclusions— Patients subjected to CABG within 7 days after thrombolysis demonstrated increased long-term survival.

2006 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 1650-1657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen Gorman Koch ◽  
Liang Li ◽  
Andra I. Duncan ◽  
Tomislav Mihaljevic ◽  
Floyd D. Loop ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 595-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley T. O’Neal ◽  
Jimmy T. Efird ◽  
Hope Landrine ◽  
Curtis A. Anderson ◽  
Stephen W. Davies ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 422-428
Author(s):  
BH Kirmani ◽  
S Power ◽  
J Zacharias

Introduction Endoscopic vein harvest is the technique of choice in North America, where it constitutes 80% of conduit harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting. The UK has much lower rates, despite demonstrable perioperative benefits. Concerns about patency and long-term survival are often cited as reasons for poor uptake and evidence in the literature thus far has only addressed mid-term outcomes. We sought to identify the long-term survival of patients undergoing endoscopic vein harvest compared with a contemporaneous cohort of open vein harvest. Materials and methods This was a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution between 2007 and 2017. All-cause long-term mortality was compared using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank analysis. Results A total of 7,527 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (1,029 receiving endoscopic vein harvest) were studied. The groups were well matched for preoperative characteristics, except that there were more patients with triple-vessel disease and good left-ventricular function in the endoscopic vein harvest group. There was no statistically significant difference in the long-term survival (p = 0.23). At five years (median follow-up), survival was 86.1% (95% confidence interval 85.3–87.0) in the open vein harvest group compared with 85.5% (95% confidence interval 82.8–88.2) in the endoscopic vein harvest group. Discussion and conclusion Endoscopic vein harvest does not affect long-term survival in an unselected population. The contraindications for minimally invasive vein harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting are increasingly diminishing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document