Rescaling Retinal Size into Perceived Size: Evidence for an Occipital and Parietal Bottleneck

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1334-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Kreutzer ◽  
Ralph Weidner ◽  
Gereon R. Fink

The spatial and temporal context of an object influence its perceived size. Two visual illusions illustrate this nicely: the size adaptation effect and the Ebbinghaus illusion. Whereas size adaptation affects size rescaling of a target circle via a previously presented, differently sized adaptor circle, the Ebbinghaus illusion alters perceived size by virtue of surrounding circles. In the classical Ebbinghaus setting, the surrounding circles are shown simultaneously with the target. However, size underestimation persists when the surrounding circles precede the target. Such a temporal separation of inducer and target circles in both illusions permits the comparison of BOLD signals elicited by two displays that, although objectively identical, elicit different percepts. The current study combined both illusions in a factorial design to identify a presumed common central mechanism involved in rescaling retinal into perceived size. At the behavioral level, combining both illusions did not affect perceived size further. At the neural level, however, this combination induced functional activation beyond that induced by either illusion separately: An underadditive activation pattern was found within left lingual gyrus, right supramarginal gyrus, and right superior parietal cortex. These findings provide direct behavioral and functional evidence for the presence of a neural bottleneck in rescaling retinal into perceived size, a process vital for visual perception.

2020 ◽  
Vol E103.D (9) ◽  
pp. 2032-2034
Author(s):  
Keiichiro INAGAKI ◽  
Tatsuya MARUNO ◽  
Kota YAMAMOTO

Author(s):  
Tao He ◽  
David Richter ◽  
Zhiguo Wang ◽  
Floris P. de Lange

AbstractBoth spatial and temporal context play an important role in visual perception and behavior. Humans can extract statistical regularities from both forms of context to help processing the present and to construct expectations about the future. Numerous studies have found reduced neural responses to expected stimuli compared to unexpected stimuli, for both spatial and temporal regularities. However, it is largely unclear whether and how these forms of context interact. In the current fMRI study, thirty-three human volunteers were exposed to object stimuli that could be expected or surprising in terms of their spatial and temporal context. We found a reliable independent contribution of both spatial and temporal context in modulating the neural response. Specifically, neural responses to stimuli in expected compared to unexpected contexts were suppressed throughout the ventral visual stream. Interestingly, the modulation by spatial context was stronger in magnitude and more reliable than modulations by temporal context. These results suggest that while both spatial and temporal context serve as a prior that can modulate sensory processing in a similar fashion, predictions of spatial context may be a more powerful modulator in the visual system.Significance StatementBoth temporal and spatial context can affect visual perception, however it is largely unclear if and how these different forms of context interact in modulating sensory processing. When manipulating both temporal and spatial context expectations, we found that they jointly affected sensory processing, evident as a suppression of neural responses for expected compared to unexpected stimuli. Interestingly, the modulation by spatial context was stronger than that by temporal context. Together, our results suggest that spatial context may be a stronger modulator of neural responses than temporal context within the visual system. Thereby, the present study provides new evidence how different types of predictions jointly modulate perceptual processing.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ella Bosch ◽  
Matthias Fritsche ◽  
Christian Utzerath ◽  
Jan K. Buitelaar ◽  
Floris P. de Lange

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) or autism is characterized by social and non-social symptoms, including sensory hyper- and hyposensitivities. A suggestion has been put forward that some of these symptoms could be explained by differences in how sensory information is integrated with its context, including a lower tendency to leverage the past in the processing of new perceptual input. At least two history-dependent effects of opposite directions have been described in the visual perception literature: a repulsive adaptation effect, where perception of a stimulus is biased away from an adaptor stimulus, and an attractive serial choice bias, where perceptual choices are biased towards the previous choice. In this study, we investigated whether autistic participants differed in either bias from typically developing controls (TD). Sixty-four adolescent participants (31 with ASD, 33 TD) were asked to categorize oriented line stimuli in two tasks which were designed so that we would induce either adaptation or serial choice bias. Although our tasks successfully induced both biases, in comparing the two groups, we found no differences in the magnitude of adaptation nor in the modulation of perceptual choices by the previous choice. In conclusion, we find no evidence of a decreased integration of the past in visual perception of autistic individuals.


Author(s):  
Marta Macchi ◽  
Livia Nicoletta Rossi ◽  
Ivan Cortinovis ◽  
Lucia Menegazzo ◽  
Sandra Maria Burri ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-228
Author(s):  
Julian Hochberg
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document