Effect of Compression Force and Target or Target/Filter Combination on Mean Glandular Dose for Japanese Women in Full-Field Digital Mammography System

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2695-2700
Author(s):  
Mie Ishii ◽  
Mai Nakamura ◽  
Rie Ishii ◽  
Keiichi Shida ◽  
Toshikazu Hatada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Japanese Women ◽  
Compression Pressure ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Breast Compression ◽  
Mean Glandular Dose ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Breast Thickness

We constructed a mammography database of 807 Japanese women and 2,772 images obtained using five commercial full-field digital mammography (FFDM) devices at four different facilities. Five types of mammography devices fabricated by four manufacturers were used: one with a Mo target (AMULET F), one with Mo and Rh targets (Senographe DS), one with Mo and W targets (AMULET), and two with a W target (MAMMOMAT Fusion and Selenia Dimensions). The purpose of this study was to focus on the mean glandular dose (MGD) in the database and analyze the difference in the MGD of Japanese women radiographed by mammographic devices with different targets or target/filter combinations. Furthermore, we clarify the difference between the displayed and measured MGDs for the three types of mammography devices. The average compression pressure and compression breast thickness of the Japanese women in the mammography in this study were 90.9±21.7 N and 43.3±12.9 mm, respectively. The breast compression pressure slightly varied depending on the facility or FFDM device, while the compression breast thickness decreased with the increase in the compression pressure for all FFDM devices. Differences in breast compression thickness existed depending on the mammography devices. The MGDs of the two types of mammography devices using the W target were smallest (1.335±0.358, 1.218±0.464 mGy). The displayed and measured MGDs of the three types of FFDM devices had a good correlation. However, the difference between the displayed and measured MGDs of the two devices increased with the MGD.

Breast compression parameters among women screened with standard digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunvor Gipling Waade ◽  
Åsne Holen ◽  
Sofie Sebuødegård ◽  
Hildegunn Aase ◽  
Kristin Pedersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Compression Pressure ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Breast Compression ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Mean Glandular Dose ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines ◽  
Breast Thickness

Background No evidence-based guidelines regarding optimal breast compression in mammography exist, neither for standard digital mammography nor for digital breast tomosynthesis. Purpose To compare breast compression parameters and mean glandular dose in a randomized controlled trial with digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis. Material and Methods We used information from 21,729 women aged 50–69 years, who participated in the To-Be trial, as part of BreastScreen Norway, 2016–2017. Information was obtained from the DICOM header and by assessing the images in an automated software for density estimation (VolparaDensity). Using linear regression, we investigated the effect of screening technique on breast compression parameters; compression force (N), compression pressure (kPa), and compressed breast thickness (mm), and mean glandular dose (mGy), by view (craniocaudal [CC] and mediolateral oblique [MLO]). We adjusted for age, breast volume and fibroglandular volume. Results A total of 11,056 (50.9%) women were screened with digital mammography and 10,673 (49.1%) with digital breast tomosynthesis. Adjusted regression analysis showed that women undergoing digital mammography received higher compression forces than women undergoing digital breast tomosynthesis (CC: –4.7 N; MLO: –1.1 N, P < 0.001 for both), higher compression pressure (CC: –1.0 k Pa; MLO: –0.1 kPa, P < 0.001 for both), and higher values of compressed breast thickness in the MLO view (–0.3 mm, P = 0.02). The women undergoing digital mammography received a lower mean glandular dose than women undergoing digital breast tomosynthesis ([+]0.06 mGy, P < 0.001). Conclusion Women undergoing digital breast tomosynthesis received lower compression force, compression pressure, and compressed breast thickness in MLO view, compared to women undergoing digital mammography. Further studies should investigate the impact of breast compression on image quality, screening outcome, and radiation dose for digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in order to establish evidence-based guidelines for breast compression.

scholarly journals Comparison of Mean Glandular Dose between Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1758
Author(s):  
Kar Choon Teoh ◽  
Hanani Abdul Manan ◽  
Norhashimah Mohd Norsuddin ◽  
Iqbal Hussain Rizuana
Keyword(s):  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Mean Glandular Dose ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography ◽  
Dose Monitoring ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Breast Thickness

Early detection of breast cancer is diagnosed using mammography, the gold standard in breast screening. However, its increased use also provokes radiation-induced breast malignancy. Thus, monitoring and regulating the mean glandular dose (MGD) is essential. The purpose of this study was to determine MGD for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the radiology department of a single centre. We also analysed the exposure factors as a function of breast thickness. A total of 436 patients underwent both FFDM and DBT. MGD was auto calculated by the mammographic machine for each projection. Patients’ data included compressed breast thickness (CBT), peak kilovoltage (kVp), milliampere-seconds (mAs) and MGD (mGy). Result analysis showed that there is a significant difference in MGD between the two systems, namely FFDM and DBT. However, the MGD values in our centre were comparable to other centres, as well as the European guideline (<2.5 mGy) for a standard breast. Although DBT improves the clinical outcome and quality of diagnosis, the risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis should not be neglected. Regular quality control testing on mammography equipment must be performed for dose monitoring in women following a screening mammography in the future.

scholarly journals Image Quality Assessment via Segmentation of Breast Lesion in X-ray and Ultrasound Phantom Images from Fischer's Full Field Digital Mammography and Ultrasound (FFDMUS) System

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasjit Suri ◽  
Yujun Guo ◽  
Cara Coad ◽  
Tim Danielson ◽  
Idris Elbakri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Lesion Detection ◽  
Average Error ◽  
Ultrasound Images ◽  
Lesion Segmentation ◽  
Full Field ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography ◽  
The Mean

Fischer has been developing a fused full-field digital mammography and ultrasound (FFDMUS) system funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH). In FFDMUS, two sets of acquisitions are performed: 2-D X-ray and 3-D ultrasound. The segmentation of acquired lesions in phantom images is important: (i) to assess the image quality of X-ray and ultrasound images; (ii) to register multi-modality images; and (iii) to establish an automatic lesion detection methodology to assist the radiologist. In this paper we developed lesion segmentation strategies for ultrasound and X-ray images acquired using FFDMUS. For ultrasound lesion segmentation, a signal-to-noise (SNR)-based method was adapted. For X-ray segmentation, we used gradient vector flow (GVF)-based deformable model. The performance of these segmentation algorithms was evaluated. We also performed partial volume correction (PVC) analysis on the segmentation of ultrasound images. For X-ray lesion segmentation, we also studied the effect of PDE smoothing on GVF's ability to segment the lesion. We conclude that ultrasound image qualities from FFDMUS and Hand-Held ultrasound (HHUS) are comparable. The mean percentage error with PVC was 4.56% (4.31%) and 6.63% (5.89%) for 5 mm lesion and 3 mm lesion respectively. The mean average error from the segmented X-ray images with PDE yielded an average error of 9.61%. We also tested our program on synthetic datasets. The system was developed for Linux workstation using C/C++.

scholarly journals Screen-film versus full-field digital mammography: Radiation dose and image quality in a large teaching hospital

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-405
Author(s):  
Tomislav Stantic ◽  
Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac ◽  
Sanja Stojanovic ◽  
Marijana Basta-Nikolic ◽  
Danijela Arandjic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Patient Dose ◽  
Dose Assessment ◽  
Clinical Image ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Mean Glandular Dose ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography

The objective of this paper is to measure the radiation dose and image quality in conventional screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in women referred to mammography examination. Participants underwent bilateral, two-view screen-film mammography or full-field digital mammography. The visibility of anatomical regions and overall clinical image quality was rated by experienced radiologists. Total of 387 women and 1548 mammograms were enrolled in the study. Image quality was assessed in terms of image quality score, whereas patient dose assessment was performed in terms of mean glandular dose. Average mean glandular dose for cranio-caudal projection was 1.5 mGy and 2.1 mGy in full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography, respectively. For medio-lateral oblique projection, corresponding values were 2.3 and 2.1 mGy. Overall image quality criteria scoring was 0.82 and 0.99 for screen-film and digital systems, respectively. The scores were in the range from 0.11 to 1.0 for different anatomical structures. Overall, full-field digital mammography was superior both in terms of image quality and dose over the screen-film mammography. The results have indicated that phantom dose values can assist in setting the optimisation activities in mammography and for comparison between mammography units. To obtain accurate diagnostic information with an acceptable radiation dose to breast, it is necessary to periodically perform patient dose and image quality surveys in all mammography units.

scholarly journals Assessment of Average Glandular Dose Received in Full-field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Napat Ritlumlert ◽  
Sutthirak Tangruangkiat ◽  
Supannika Kawvised ◽  
Phornpailin Pairodsantikul ◽  
Phornpailin Pairodsantikul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Tube Voltage ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Full Field ◽  
The Third ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography ◽  
Breast Thickness

Objective: To assess the average glandular doses (AGD) from full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Material and Methods: Radiographic exposure parameters target/filter, tube voltage, and tube current were collected from 50 patients. Patient information including age, breast thickness, entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) and AGD from the monitor display were also recorded. The tube outputs (tube voltage and tube loadings) at the reference points in both FFDM and DBT modes were measured. The AGD was calculated from ESAK by using the correction factors following the Technical Report Series no. 457 protocol. For the DBT mode, the AGD was calculated and corrected for the X-ray gantry rotation following the Dance et al. method. Results: The radiation doses to breasts in terms of ESAK and AGD from FFDM were 4.97±2.29 and 1.36±0.48 milligray (mGy) respectively. The third quartiles were 6.5 mGy and 1.67 mGy, findings which were lower than the standard Dose Reference Levels reported by the International Atomic Energy Agency recommendation (AGD 3 mGy/view for standard breast thickness with grid). For the DBT mode, ESAK and AGD were 6.49±2.10 mGy and 1.63±0.51 mGy. The third quartiles were 7.68 mGy and 1.81 mGy which were more than the FFDM mode by 23.0% and 17.0%, respectively. Conclusion: This study found that the AGD received from the DBT mode was higher than from the FFDM mode. Patients who underwent combination modes of mammographic examination increasingly received AGD up to 1.74 mGy. However, the AGD in our institute was still lower than the standard AGD recommendations.

TOWARDS NATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR MAMMOGRAPHY IN SERBIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 191 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-486
Author(s):  
S Rafajlovic ◽  
O Ciraj-Bjelac ◽  
P Bozovic
Keyword(s):  
Computed Radiography ◽  
Screening Mammography ◽  
Diagnostic Reference Levels ◽  
Reference Levels ◽  
Full Field ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Mean Glandular Dose ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography ◽  
Tube Output ◽  
Breast Thickness

Abstract The objective of this work is to investigate the possibility to set a national diagnostic reference levels (nDRLs) for diagnostic and screening mammography in Serbia based on local practice and available resources. This study included all types of mammography systems that are currently used in Serbia, namely screen-film mammography (SFM), computed radiography (CR) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM). The nDRLs are provided in terms of mean glandular dose (MGD) for different breast thicknesses simulated by polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom. For each breast thickness, MGD was calculated for the X-ray tube output, using clinically used exposure parameters. DRLs were chosen as the 75th percentile of MGD distribution for 20-, 40-, 45-, 60- and 70-mm phantom thicknesses. For SFM units proposed nDRL values are 0.7, 2.1, 2.7, 4.6 and 6.8 mGy; for CR units proposed nDRL values are 0.7, 1.8, 2.4, 4.5 and 5.6 mGy; and corresponding values for FFDM units are 0.8, 1.7, 2, 2. and 3.2 mGy for 20-, 40-, 45-, 60- and 70-mm PMMA thickness, respectively.

scholarly journals Comparison between Recorded and Measured Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Full-field Digital Mammography: A Phantom Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Akram Mahmoud Asbeutah ◽  
Ajit Brindhaban
Keyword(s):  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Control Program ◽  
Skin Dose ◽  
Quality Control Program ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography ◽  
Tissue Equivalent ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Mean Differences

Objectives: There are concerns regarding the difference between directly recorded and measured entrance skin dose (ESD) and average glandular dose (AGD) in full-field digital mammography (FFDM). The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of different exposure parameters on ESD and AGD recorded directly and measured from an FFDM unit using a phantom. Material and Methods: The ESD and AGD of 27 FFDM (craniocaudal [CC] projection) images of tissue-equivalent phantoms were acquired using a general electric (GE Senographe Essential) FFDM unit. The phantoms were used to simulate three different breast thicknesses and compositions. Tube potential, tube load, and target/ filter combinations also were recorded directly from the FFDM unit. Results: The mean differences between the directly recorded and measured ESD and AGD were 0.23 and 0.080, respectively. The 95% confidence intervals for ESD and AGD were 0.1–0.36 and 0.04–0.10, respectively. Results of paired t-test showed statistically significant difference between the directly recorded and measured ESD (P = .001) and AGD (P < .001). A positive and significant correlation was noted between the directly recorded and measured ESD (r = 0.85, P < .001) and AGD (r = 0.91, P < .001). Conclusion: This observation confirms that we can use the directly recorded doses obtained from an FFDM for quality control program.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document