Characteristics of MML/EAP Parameter Estimates in the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Roberts ◽  
John R. Donoghue ◽  
James E. Laughlin
2021 ◽  
pp. 014662162110517
Author(s):  
Seang-Hwane Joo ◽  
Philseok Lee ◽  
Stephen Stark

Collateral information has been used to address subpopulation heterogeneity and increase estimation accuracy in some large-scale cognitive assessments. The methodology that takes collateral information into account has not been developed and explored in published research with models designed specifically for noncognitive measurement. Because the accurate noncognitive measurement is becoming increasingly important, we sought to examine the benefits of using collateral information in latent trait estimation with an item response theory model that has proven valuable for noncognitive testing, namely, the generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM). Our presentation introduces an extension of the GGUM that incorporates collateral information, henceforth called Explanatory GGUM. We then present a simulation study that examined Explanatory GGUM latent trait estimation as a function of sample size, test length, number of background covariates, and correlation between the covariates and the latent trait. Results indicated the Explanatory GGUM approach provides scoring accuracy and precision superior to traditional expected a posteriori (EAP) and full Bayesian (FB) methods. Implications and recommendations are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaojun Li ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Mengyang Cao ◽  
Louis Tay

Many researchers have found that unfolding models may better represent how respondents answer Liker-type items and response styles (RSs) often have moderate to strong presence in responses to such items. However, the two research lines have been growing largely in parallel. The present study proposed an unfolding item response tree (UIRTree) model that can account for unfolding response process and RSs simultaneously. An empirical illustration showed that the UIRTree model could fit a personality dataset well and produced more reasonable parameter estimates. Strong presence of the extreme response style (ERS) was also revealed by the UIRTree model. We further conducted a Monte Carlo simulation study to examine the performance of the UIRTree model compared to three other models for Likert-scale responses: the Samejima’s graded response model, the generalized graded unfolding model, and the dominance item response tree (DIRTree) model. Results showed that when data followed unfolding response process and contained the ERS, the AIC was able to select the UIRTree model, while BIC was biased towards the DIRTree model in many conditions. In addition, model parameters in the UIRTree model could be accurately recovered under realistic conditions, and wrongly assuming the item response process or ignoring RSs was detrimental to the estimation of key parameters. In general, the UIRTree model is expected to help in better understanding of responses to Liker-type items theoretically and contribute to better scale development practically. Future studies on multi-trait UIRTree models and UIRTree models accounting for different types of RSs are expected.


2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Roberts ◽  
Haw-ren Fang ◽  
Weiwei Cui ◽  
Yingji Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document