The Effectiveness of the Foreign-Trade Zone as an Export Promotion Program: Policy Issues and Alternatives

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynette Knowles Mathur ◽  
Ike Mathur
2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang-Seo Park ◽  
In-Kwon Kim ◽  
Jong-Seok Ahn

2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Jakus ◽  
Kimberly L. Jensen ◽  
George C. Davis

The USDA's Market Access Program (formerly Market Promotion Program) recently underwent a major change to redirect all branded products export promotion funds to small domestic firms and cooperatives. The redirection responded to criticisms by the General Accounting Office of past allocations of branded products export promotion funds to large, experienced exporters. This study uses a firm-level analysis to examine whether firm size and export experience matter in how effectively firms use the promotion funds to increase their revenues. The results support neither the GAO criticisms nor the recent program redirection.


1998 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 66-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denice E. Welch ◽  
Lawrence S. Welch ◽  
Louise C. Young ◽  
Ian F. Wilkinson

1981 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-100
Author(s):  
Pedro Alba ◽  
David Blandford ◽  
Richard Boisvert

In the Northeast, the principal market expansion for its manufactured products is likely to come from outside. Sales to export markets can create jobs and could potentially exacerbate the region's dependence on imported energy. This analysis demonstrates that 26% of the Northeast's manufacturing employment is in sectors which have experienced significant expansion in exports in recent years. For most of the export sectors, the employment contribution is above the average for domestically-oriented industries, and the energy requirement is below the average. By focusing export promotion policies on these sectors, employment objectives need not conflict with energy conservation objectives.


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 558-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary W. Williams ◽  
Oral Capps

An issue for generic advertising in agricultural markets with unregulated supplies is that the promotion-induced demand shift could lead to a supply response that substantially attenuates the price effects of the promotion. For the generic promotion of fish exports, however, the concern is generally just the opposite—the possibility that extensive government supply controls could render promotion efforts to expand export sales ineffectual due to little or no supply response. This study considers the effects of government whitefish (cod, haddock, and others) supply controls on the effectiveness of the Norwegian Seafood Council (NSC) whitefish export promotion program. We use an econometric simulation model to measure the effectiveness and returns to NSC whitefish export promotion under a range of possible export supply control conditions. Results indicate that effective supply control maximizes the return to promotion and that ineffectual supply control imposes a potentially large opportunity cost on the promoting industry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document