The Biomechanical Effect of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Knee Joint Function

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 530-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Gill ◽  
Louis E. DeFrate ◽  
Conrad Wang ◽  
Christopher T. Carey ◽  
Shay Zayontz ◽  
...  

Background The effectiveness of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in restoring normal kinematics under physiologic loading is unknown. Hypothesis Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction does not restore normal knee kinematics under muscle loading. Study Design In vitro biomechanical study. Methods Kinematics of knees with an intact, resected, and reconstructed posterior cruciate ligament were measured by a robotic testing system under simulated muscle loads. Anteroposterior tibial translation and internal-external tibial rotation were measured at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of flexion under posterior drawer loading, quadriceps muscle loading, and combined quadriceps and hamstring muscle loading. Results Reconstruction reduced the additional posterior tibial translation caused by ligament deficiency at all flexion angles tested under posterior drawer loading. Ligament deficiency increased external rotation and posterior translation at angles higher than 60° of flexion when simulated muscle loading was applied. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduced the posterior translation and external rotation observed in posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees at higher flexion angles, but differences were not significant. Conclusion Under physiologic loading conditions, posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction does not restore six degree of freedom knee kinematics. Clinical Relevance Abnormal knee kinematics may lead to development of long-term knee arthrosis.

2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D. Harner ◽  
Marsie A. Janaushek ◽  
Akihiro Kanamori ◽  
Masayoshi Yagi ◽  
Tracy M. Vogrin ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to experimentally evaluate a single-bundle versus a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by comparing the resulting knee biomechanics with those of the intact knee. Ten human cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The knees were subjected to a 134-N posterior tibial load at five flexion angles. Three knee conditions were tested: 1) intact knee, 2) single-bundle reconstruction, and 3) double-bundle reconstruction. Posterior tibial translation of the intact knee ranged from 4.9 2.7 mm at 90° to 7.2 1.5 mm at full extension. After the single-bundle reconstruction, posterior tibial translation increased to 7.3 3.9 mm and 9.2 2.8 mm at 90° and full extension, respectively, while the corresponding in situ forces in the graft were up to 44 19 N lower than those in the intact ligament. Conversely, with double-bundle reconstruction, the posterior tibial translation did not differ significantly from the intact knee at any flexion angle tested. This reconstruction also restored in situ forces more closely than did the single-bundle reconstruction. These data suggest that a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can more closely restore the biomechanics of the intact knee than can the single-bundle reconstruction throughout the range of knee flexion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document