Arthroscopic Glenoid Bone Grafting With Nonrigid Fixation for Anterior Shoulder Instability

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 831-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinzhong Zhao ◽  
Xiaoqiao Huangfu ◽  
Xingguang Yang ◽  
Guoming Xie ◽  
Caiqi Xu
2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1522-1529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Moroder ◽  
Wolfgang Hitzl ◽  
Mark Tauber ◽  
Thomas Hoffelner ◽  
Herbert Resch ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 1857-1864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastian Sigrist ◽  
Stephen Ferguson ◽  
Elisabeth Boehm ◽  
Christian Jung ◽  
Markus Scheibel ◽  
...  

Background: Individual constitutional differences in glenoid shape and bone remodeling require a patient-specific and longitudinal approach to evaluate the biomechanical effects of glenoid bone grafting in patients with anterior shoulder instability. Purpose: To quantify the longitudinal, in vivo, biomechanical effects of bone grafting, bone graft remodeling, and glenoid shape in patients with anterior shoulder instability by means of patient-specific finite element models. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: In total, 25 shoulders of 24 patients with anterior shoulder instability and anterior glenoid bone loss underwent an arthroscopic iliac crest bone graft transfer (ICBGT) procedure with either autologous or allogenic bone. Patient-specific finite element simulations based on preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up computed tomography scans were used to quantify the bone-mediated stability ratio (SR) and the distance to dislocation. Additionally, the relationship between glenoid morphological parameters and the SR was assessed. Results: The ICBGT procedure significantly increased the SR and distance to dislocation in the 2-, 3-, and 4-o’clock directions immediately after the surgical intervention ( P < .01) in both the autograft and the allograft groups. Although the SR and distance to dislocation decreased subsequently, autografts showed long-term effects on SR and dislocation distance in the 3-o’clock direction ( P < .01) and on SR in the 4-o’clock direction ( P < .01). Allografts showed no significant effect on SR and dislocation distance in long-term follow-up ( P > .05). Overall, glenoid retroversion as well as cavity depth predicted stability in all 4 dislocation directions, with glenoid cavity depth showing the highest correlation coefficients ( R = 0.71, 0.8, 0.73, and 0.7 for 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-o’clock, respectively). Conclusion: The autologous ICBGT procedure biomechanically improved anterior shoulder stability in long-term follow-up, whereas the use of allografts did not show any bone-mediated biomechanical effect at follow-up due to resorption. Furthermore, in addition to measurements of defect extent, the glenoid depth and version seem to be useful parameters to determine the biomechanical effect and need for glenoid bone grafting in patients with shoulder instability. Clinical Relevance: This study proposes the use of autologous bone grafts for a successful long-term stabilization effect. Additionally, this study proposes additional glenoid morphological measures to predict shoulder stability.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Henrique Schmidt Lara ◽  
Leandro Masini Ribeiro ◽  
Alberto de Castro Pochini ◽  
Carlos Vicente Andreoli ◽  
Paulo Santoro Belangero ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Chronic traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder is a frequent event, especially in young athletes. Several management techniques have been proposed for this condition. The objectives of these procedures are to re-establish a stable and functional shoulder and to prevent the development of osteoarthritis. It is well known in the literature that a bone loss greater than 20% to 25% leads to a higher rate of recurrence and worse prognosis regarding the evolution of anterior shoulder instability, often requiring glenoid bone grafting procedures. Previous studies evaluated the recurrence and complications associated with these procedures; however, there are various clinical and radiological indications, and no study systematically evaluated these indications, which are associated with better clinical outcomes and lower rates of complications. This paper outlines the protocol for a systematic review intended to summarise the best available clinical evidence and will indicate what further research requires.Methods: An electronic search will be conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane, and EBSCO databases. Clinical studies of glenoid bone grafting procedures have been indicated for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability, evaluating which indications are related to a better functional result for the patient. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Downs and Black checklist for observational studies and the Cochrane Collaboration tool for randomised controlled trials.Discussion: This systematic review will summarise the clinical and radiological indications for glenoid bone grafting procedures, revealing those related to better outcomes. The findings from this review will establish the quality of currently available evidence, thereby determining the need for further studies to establish the best indications for these procedures.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020210462


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document