scholarly journals Koechlin’s volume: Perception of sound extensity among instrument timbres from different families

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Chiasson ◽  
Caroline Traube ◽  
Clément Lagarrigue ◽  
Stephen McAdams
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Zhilin Zhang ◽  
Chunlin Li ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Qiang Huang ◽  
Ritsu Go ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 436-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Fox ◽  
H. Kreisman ◽  
A. Colacone ◽  
N. Wolkove

The relative importance of the nose vs. the mouth in the perception of respiratory volumes has never been assessed, nor have previous respiratory perception studies been performed noninvasively. Using respiratory inductive plethysmography, we monitored 12 normal subjects noninvasively when breathing either exclusively through the nose or mouth. The sensation of inspired volume mouth breathing was compared with that of nose breathing over a wide range of the inspiratory capacity. The psychophysical techniques of tidal volume duplication, tidal volume doubling, and magnitude estimation were utilized. A just noticeable difference was calculated from the constant error of the tidal volume duplication trials. The exponents for magnitude estimation were 1.06 and 1.07 for nose and mouth breathing, respectively. The other psychophysical techniques also revealed no differences in nose and mouth volume perception. These results suggest that tidal volume changes are perceived equally well through the nose and mouth. Furthermore, the location of the receptors, important in volume perception, is probably at a distal point common to the nose and mouth.


2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1125-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aileen K. Ho ◽  
John L. Bradshaw ◽  
Robert Iansek
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 40 (Part 2, No. 9A/B) ◽  
pp. L958-L960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osamu Watanabe ◽  
Masanori Idesawa

1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Lansing ◽  
Robert B. Banzett ◽  
Robert Brown ◽  
Michael B. Reid ◽  
Susan Kaplan

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 183-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Idesawa ◽  
T Iwamoto ◽  
Y Hara ◽  
Y Sakaguchi

We reported earlier that the binocularly unpaired region plays an essential role in the perception of the volume of a solid object (Idesawa, 1991 Japanese Journal of Applied Physics30-4B L751 - L754). We have investigated this volume perception using both illusory and physical objects. The illusory objects used in the tests were of two types, either with or without binocularly unpaired contours. The physical objects used as stimuli in the present experiments were half-moon-shaped textured cylindrical objects, one with and one without a binocularly unpaired region. A rectangular probe was placed beyond the object, and subjects were asked to adjust its position in depth until they felt that the probe just touched the object. We found that the chosen depth settings were systematically ‘behind’ the objects with unpaired parts, while they were almost ‘correct’ for the objects without unpaired parts. In the former case, subjects thus had the impression that the volume extended further back. We also found that the rim of an object is important for volume perception, especially for objects without textures. A typical example is an imaginary cone occluding two disks, one a little larger than the bottom surface and placed near the bottom, the other a small one located just beyond the top. A complete illusory cone with volume (just like a ‘Santa cap’) could be seen!


Author(s):  
M. Kahrimanovic ◽  
W. M. Bergmann Tiest ◽  
A. M. L. Kappers
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohong Cheng ◽  
Masanori Idesawa ◽  
Qin Wang
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 44-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Siragusano
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document