Safety and Efficacy of the Popliteal Fossa Nerve Block When Utilized for Foot and Ankle Surgery

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 394-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Provenzano ◽  
Eugene R. Viscusi ◽  
Samuel B. Adams ◽  
Michael B. Kerner ◽  
Marc C. Torjman ◽  
...  

The popliteal fossa nerve block (PFNB) offers numerous advantages that make it a suitable anesthetic technique for foot and ankle surgery. In this retrospective study, we investigated the acute and long-term safety and efficacy of this relatively underutilized anesthetic technique for foot and ankle surgery. A review of 834 patients who underwent foot and/or ankle surgery by the coauthor (NAA) was conducted. Four hundred sixty-seven patients received a PFNB with the aid of a peripheral nerve stimulator. Variables assessed included the quality of surgical anesthesia, postoperative analgesia and the acute and long-term incidence of postoperative neuralgia and neuropraxia. The PFNBs were performed by anesthesiologists with various levels of training at a tertiary care hospital and all were supplemented with a saphenous nerve block. The PFNB was successful as the sole anesthetic technique in 79% of the cases; 18% were converted to general anesthesia and 3% required augmentation with local anesthetic. There were no complications associated with the PFNB. There were no incidents of postoperative neuralgia or neuropraxia. Only 12% of patients with a successful block required analgesics in the PACU, while 60% of patients with a failed block required systemic analgesics for surgical site pain (p<0.01). These results suggest that the performance of the PFNB with the guidance of a peripheral nerve stimulator is a safe and effective anesthetic technique for foot and ankle surgery.

1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 378-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt Rongstad ◽  
Roger A. Mann ◽  
David Prieskom ◽  
Steve Nichelson ◽  
Greg Horton

Eighty-six patients were evaluated prospectively following the placement of a sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa after a major foot or ankle operation. Needle placement was guided by a peripheral nerve stimulator and 30 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine was used. Ninety-seven percent of patients had a successful block. Only one patient had severe discomfort during the block placement. The block lasted an average of 20 hours. During the first 24 hours after surgery, patients took an average of three hydrocodone tablets. Twenty-two of the 23 patients who had had previous major foot or ankle surgery found that the block was better than their previous pain control regimen. No patient had complications related to the block and 95% were satisfied and would have the block again.


1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Sparks ◽  
T. Higeleo

Combined tibial and common peroneal nerve anaesthesia was used for foot and ankle surgery in fifty-six adults. Where necessary, the saphenous nerve was also blocked. A calibrated constant current nerve stimulator was used to localise the nerves in the popliteal fossa. Using lignocaine 1%, an opioid premedication, but no other sedation or top-up injection, 60% of the blocks were successful. If a patient felt pain at incision or during surgery, the block was recorded as a failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document