Popliteal Fossa Neural Blockade as the Sole Anesthetic Technique for Outpatient Foot and Ankle Surgery

2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Hansen ◽  
Martha R. Eshelman ◽  
Andrea Cracchiolo
Keyword(s):  
Popliteal Fossa ◽  
Anesthetic Technique ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Neural Blockade ◽  
Ankle Surgery

Safety and Efficacy of the Popliteal Fossa Nerve Block When Utilized for Foot and Ankle Surgery

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 394-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Provenzano ◽  
Eugene R. Viscusi ◽  
Samuel B. Adams ◽  
Michael B. Kerner ◽  
Marc C. Torjman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Popliteal Fossa ◽  
Anesthetic Technique ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Nerve Stimulator ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Stimulator ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Ankle Surgery

The popliteal fossa nerve block (PFNB) offers numerous advantages that make it a suitable anesthetic technique for foot and ankle surgery. In this retrospective study, we investigated the acute and long-term safety and efficacy of this relatively underutilized anesthetic technique for foot and ankle surgery. A review of 834 patients who underwent foot and/or ankle surgery by the coauthor (NAA) was conducted. Four hundred sixty-seven patients received a PFNB with the aid of a peripheral nerve stimulator. Variables assessed included the quality of surgical anesthesia, postoperative analgesia and the acute and long-term incidence of postoperative neuralgia and neuropraxia. The PFNBs were performed by anesthesiologists with various levels of training at a tertiary care hospital and all were supplemented with a saphenous nerve block. The PFNB was successful as the sole anesthetic technique in 79% of the cases; 18% were converted to general anesthesia and 3% required augmentation with local anesthetic. There were no complications associated with the PFNB. There were no incidents of postoperative neuralgia or neuropraxia. Only 12% of patients with a successful block required analgesics in the PACU, while 60% of patients with a failed block required systemic analgesics for surgical site pain (p<0.01). These results suggest that the performance of the PFNB with the guidance of a peripheral nerve stimulator is a safe and effective anesthetic technique for foot and ankle surgery.

scholarly journals 4-in-1 and 5-in-1 blocks in percutaneous forefoot surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-83
Author(s):  
César Lima Oliveira ◽  
Lucio Carlos de Azevedo Torres Filho ◽  
Luiz Carlos Ribeiro Lara ◽  
Gabriel Lopes de Faria Cervone ◽  
Rafael Nogueira Figueiredo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Anesthetic Technique ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Forefoot Surgery ◽  
Ankle Surgery ◽  
Study Case ◽  
Therapeutic Study ◽  
Male Subjects

Objective: To analyze the effectiveness of peripheral nerve blocks in the ankle in percutaneous forefoot surgery and their potential complications. Methods: Retrospective study with a survey of the medical records of patients who underwent percutaneous orthopedic surgery onthe forefoot between 2009 and 2015, performed by the orthopedic foot  and ankle surgery group of our hospital, in which 4-in-1 and 5-in-1 anesthetic nerve blocks were used. We evaluated 239 cases, consisting of 222 female and 17 male subjects with a mean age of 61.2 years, seeking to observe the effectiveness and potential complications of the anesthetic technique. Results: Complications were observed in 3.34% of the 239 patients, with seven cases of neuritis and one case of tachycardia. Regarding the anesthetic technique, there were nine cases of block failure (3.76%), with four cases requiring supplementary local anesthetic, one case spinal anesthesia, and four cases general anesthesia. Conclusion: Having observed the low rate of complications and the almost complete success of 5-in-1 blocks in percutaneous forefoot surgery, we concluded that it is a safe and effective anesthetic technique. Level of Evidence IV, Therapeutic Study; Case Series.

scholarly journals Foot Surgery in Vanuatu: Results of Combined Tibial, Common Peroneal and Saphenous Nerve Blocks in Fifty-six Adults

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Sparks ◽  
T. Higeleo
Keyword(s):  
Peroneal Nerve ◽  
Common Peroneal Nerve ◽  
Saphenous Nerve ◽  
Popliteal Fossa ◽  
Constant Current ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Nerve Stimulator ◽  
Foot Surgery ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Ankle Surgery

Combined tibial and common peroneal nerve anaesthesia was used for foot and ankle surgery in fifty-six adults. Where necessary, the saphenous nerve was also blocked. A calibrated constant current nerve stimulator was used to localise the nerves in the popliteal fossa. Using lignocaine 1%, an opioid premedication, but no other sedation or top-up injection, 60% of the blocks were successful. If a patient felt pain at incision or during surgery, the block was recorded as a failure.

scholarly journals Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Nerve Block with Short-Acting Lidocaine in the Surgical Treatment of Ingrown Toenails

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 5059
Author(s):  
Beom Suk Kim ◽  
Kyungho Kim ◽  
Jonathan Day ◽  
Jesse Seilern Und Seilern Und Aspang ◽  
Jaeyoung Kim
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Skin Penetration ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Ingrown Toenail ◽  
Ankle Surgery ◽  
Ingrown Toenails ◽  
Digital Nerve Block

Background: Digital nerve block (DB) is a commonly utilized anesthetic procedure in ingrown toenail surgery. However, severe procedure-related pain has been reported. Although the popliteal sciatic nerve block (PB) is widely accepted in foot and ankle surgery, its use in ingrown toenail surgery has not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of PB in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails. Methods: One-hundred-ten patients surgically treated for an ingrown toenail were enrolled. Sixty-six patients underwent DB, and 44 underwent PB. PB was performed under ultrasound-guidance via a 22-gauge needle with 15 mL of 1% lidocaine in the popliteal region. The visual analogue scale was used to assess pain at two-time points: pain with skin penetration and pain with the solution injection. Time to sensory block, duration of sensory block, need for additional injections, and adverse events were recorded. Results: PB group demonstrated significantly lower procedure-related pain than the DB group. Time to sensory block was significantly longer in the PB group (20.8 ± 4.6 versus 6.5 ± 1.6 minutes). The sensory block duration was significantly longer in the PB group (187.9 ± 22.0 versus 106.5 ± 19.1 minutes). Additional injections were required in 16 (24.2%) DB cases, while no additional injections were required in PB cases. Four adverse events occurred in the DB group and two in the PB group. Conclusion: PB was a less painful anesthetic procedure associated with a longer sensory block duration and fewer repeat injections compared with DB. The result of this study implicates that PB can be an alternative anesthetic option in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails.

Excess Opioid Disposal Following Orthopaedic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 193864002098092
Author(s):  
Cornelia Keyser ◽  
Abhiram Bhashyam ◽  
Abdurrahman Abdurrob ◽  
Jeremy T. Smith ◽  
Eric Bluman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Opioid Medication ◽  
Ankle Surgery ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Level I ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Experimental Group

Background Previous research indicates low disposal rates of excess postoperative narcotics, leaving them available for diversion or abuse. This study examined the effect of introducing a portable disposal device on excess opiate opioid disposal rates after lower extremity orthopaedic surgery. Methods This was a single site randomized control trial within an outpatient orthopaedic clinic. All patients 18 years or older, undergoing outpatient foot and ankle surgery between December 1, 2017 and August 1, 2018 were eligible. Patients were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive standard opioid disposal instructions or a drug deactivation device at 2-week postoperative appointments. Participants completed an anonymous survey at 6-week postoperative appointments. Results Of the 75 patients surveyed, 68% (n = 26) of the experimental group and 56% (n = 21) of the control group had unused opioid medication. Of these, 84.6% of patients who were given Deterra Drug Deactivation System deactivation pouches safely disposed of excess medication, compared with 38% of controls (P = .003). When asked if they would use a disposal device for excess medication in the future, 97.4% (n = 37) of the experimental and 83.8% (n = 31) of the control group reported that they would. Conclusions Providing a portable disposal device with postoperative narcotic prescriptions may increase safe disposal rates of excess opioid medication following lower extremity orthopaedic surgery. Levels of Evidence Level I

scholarly journals Medical Malpractice Trends in Foot and Ankle Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0004
Author(s):  
Rishin J. Kadakia ◽  
Keith Orland ◽  
Akhil Sharma ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Craig C. Akoh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Malpractice ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Adult Females ◽  
Forefoot Surgery ◽  
Ankle Surgery ◽  
Malpractice Claims

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: Medical malpractice lawsuits can place significant economic and psychologic burden on a provider. Orthopaedic surgery is one of the most common subspecialties involved in malpractice claims. There is currently no study examining malpractice lawsuits within foot and ankle surgery. Accordingly, the purpose of this work is to examine trends in malpractice claims in foot and ankle surgery. Methods: The Westlaw legal database was queried for lawsuits pertaining to foot and ankle surgery from 2008 to 2018. Only cases involving medical malpractice were included for analysis. All available details pertaining to the cases were collected. This included plaintiff demographic and geographic data. Details regarding the cases were also collected such as anatomical location, pathology, complications, and case outcomes. Results: Forty nine malpractice lawsuits pertaining to foot and ankle were identified. Most plaintiffs in these cases were adult females, and the majority of cases occurred in the northeast (53.1%). The most common anatomical region involved in claims involved the forefoot (29%). The majority of these claims involved surgery (65%). Infection was the most common complication seen in claims (22%). The jury ruled in favor of the defendant surgeon in most cases (73%). Conclusion: This is the first study to examine trends in medical malpractice within foot and ankle surgery. Infection was the most frequent complication seen in claims and forefoot surgery was the most common anatomic location. A large portion of claims resulted after nonoperative treatment. A better understanding of the trends within malpractice claims is crucial to developing strategies for prevention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document