The Personality Assessment Inventory as a Proxy for the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised

Assessment ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin S. Douglas ◽  
Laura S. Guy ◽  
John F. Edens ◽  
Douglas P. Boer ◽  
Jennine Hamilton
2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 497-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Buffington-Vollum ◽  
John F. Edens ◽  
Darryl W. Johnson ◽  
Judy K. Johnson

This study compares the utility of two measures of psychopathic traits, the Antisocial Features (ANT) scale of the Personality Assessment Inventory and the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL-R), to predict serious institutional misconduct among incarcerated sex offenders over a 2-year follow-up period. Archival disciplinary data for 58 offenders were classified as major infractions involving physical aggression, verbal aggression/acts of defiance, or nonaggressive offenses. Significant correlations were obtained between both measures of psychopathy and each type of disciplinary offense except physical aggression, the occurrence of which was rare in this sample. Regression analyses indicated that each measure accounted for unique—or incremental—variance in one of the criterion measures. Overall classification accuracy based on standard cut scores was somewhat more positive for ANT than for the PCL-R.


2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Grann

Summary: Hare's Psychopathy Checklist - Revised (PCL-R; Hare, 1991 ) was originally constructed for use among males in correctional and forensic settings. In this study, the PCL-R protocols of 36 matched pairs of female and male violent offenders were examined with respect to gender differences. The results indicated a few significant differences. By means of discriminant analysis, male Ss were distinguished from their female counterparts through their relatively higher scores on “callous/lack of empathy” (item 8) and “juvenile delinquency” (item 18), whereas the female Ss scored relatively higher on “promiscuous sexual behavior” (item 11). Some sources of bias and possible implications are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
David DeMatteo ◽  
Stephen D. Hart ◽  
Kirk Heilbrun ◽  
Marcus T. Boccaccini ◽  
Mark D. Cunningham ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1226-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Pignolo ◽  
Santo Di Nuovo ◽  
Mario Fulcheri ◽  
Adriana Lis ◽  
Claudia Mazzeschi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document