FemoSeal® vascular closure device for antegrade common femoral artery access: Safety and technical notes

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Bruno Tagliaferro ◽  
Gianluigi Orgera ◽  
Luca Mascagni ◽  
Florindo Laurino ◽  
Marcello Andrea Tipaldi ◽  
...  

Purpose: To retrospectively assess the efficacy and safety of FemoSeal® vascular closure device to achieve hemostasis following antegrade common femoral artery puncture after lower limb revascularization using vascular sheaths from 5 to 8 Fr. Methods: We reviewed the hemostatic outcome achieved with FemoSeal in 103 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 ± 8 years, 71 males) that undergone to 111 antegrade common femoral artery accesses for percutaneous lower limbs revascularization using 5- to 8-Fr vascular sheaths. We used FemoSeal in an unselected population, without exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the technical success, meant as achieving complete hemostasis without immediate complications. Results: Hemostasis was achieved in all 111 puncture sites (100% technical success). We observed eight (7%) puncture site minor complications (hematomas), none of which affecting the patients’ outcome or requiring further therapies or increasing the hospital stay. There were no statistically significant differences between the variables potentially related to the occurrence of complications (age, international normalized ratio, platelet count, partial thromboplastin time ratio, body mass index, and common femoral arteries calcification grade) in patients with and without complications. Complications group mean body mass index was 26.4 ± 2.8 kg/m2 versus non-complications group 26.6 ± 4.4 kg/m2, p = 0.92. Mean international normalized ratio and partial thromboplastin time ratio were 1.05 ± 0.01 and 1.05 ± 0.14 versus 1.13 ± 0.2 (p = 0.39) and 1.12 ± 0.23 (p = 0.53), respectively. Common femoral arteries calcification grade was the same (mean: 1, p = 1). Platelet count was 202 × 103/mL ± 66.7 versus 226 × 103/mL ± 91.2, p = 0.55. Mean age was 72.3 ± 10 years versus 72.8 ± 8 years, p = 0.86. Conclusion: The low rate (7%) and grading of the adverse events, combined with the high technical success rate (100%), in an unselected group of patients treated in daily routine, suggest high safety and efficacy of FemoSeal vascular closure device in antegrade common femoral artery puncture site hemostasis when using vascular sheaths ranging from 5 to 8 Fr. Therefore, FemoSeal could be considered as a first-line hemostasis strategy in such cases.

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982096694
Author(s):  
Jin Ho Hwang ◽  
Sang Woo Park ◽  
Woo Young Yang ◽  
Yong Wonn Kwon ◽  
Jeeyoung Min ◽  
...  

Introduction: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the Mynx vascular closure device (VCD) for arteriotomy closure after stent placement near the common femoral artery (CFA) access site. Methods: A total of 88 patients (73 men; mean age, 72 ± 9.2 years; 136 procedures) who underwent closure of CFA arteriotomy using the Mynx VCD after stent placement in proximal superficial femoral artery (SFA) with antegrade approach, or in common or external iliac artery with retrograde approach were retrospectively studied. Technical success and access site complication were evaluated. Body mass index (BMI), platelet count, international normalized ratio, prior history of ipsilateral CFA access, access direction, degree of CFA calcification, stent location and diameter, total procedure time, and sheath size were analyzed to evaluate their relationship with technical failure and development of bleeding complications. Results: Technical success was achieved in 94.9% (129/136) patients. The mean time to hemostasis was 0.7 ± 1.8 min. Technical failure was significantly associated with low BMI ( p = 0.001). Other variables presented no significant relationship with technical failure and development of complications. Ultrasonography on the day after the procedure revealed that 8 (5.9%) patients had hematoma. Conclusions: Mynx VCD for arteriotomy closure is feasible and provides hemostatic safety after stent placement near antegrade or retrograde CFA access. However, Mynx VCD may have a poor technical success rate among patients with low BMI.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 2205-2207
Author(s):  
Wouter Stomp ◽  
Daniël Eefting ◽  
Jan van Schaik ◽  
Davy R. Sudiono ◽  
Rutger W. van der Meer

2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. e102-e104 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Hussain ◽  
S Al-Hamali

Groin vessels are most commonly used to obtain vascular access for angiography because of their size and accessibility. Haemostasis at the puncture site can be achieved with manual compression alone or by using a vascular closure device. We highlight the case of a 68-year-old woman who developed acute claudication in the right leg after a routine diagnostic coronary angiogram when an Angio-Seal™ device had been employed to close a relatively low arterial puncture. On exploring the common femoral artery, fragments of the device were found occluding the bifurcation. A patch angioplasty was carried out and the patient’s claudicant symptoms improved. The Angio-Seal™ device has a polylactide and polyglycolide polymer anchor, a collagen plug and a suture contained within a carrier system. Haemostasis is achieved by compressing the arterial puncture site between the anchor and the collagen plug. The manufacturer’s recommended criterion for using the device safely permits its use only for common femoral artery punctures with an internal vessel diameter of 4mm. Anatomical confirmation of the puncture site and evidence of any arterial disease or stenosis in the artery is detected on fluoroscopy during the procedure. Recent meta-analyses have cast doubt on the assumption that vascular closure devices are superior to mechanical compression alone and serious complications do occur occasionally but are under-reported. Clinicians should be aware of the potentially serious problems that may occur when deciding to employ vascular closure devices, especially with an anatomically low puncture site.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Bozkurt Gulek ◽  
Onur Ergun ◽  
Turkmen Ciftci ◽  
Yavuz Kutlu ◽  
Bora Peynircioglu ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 659-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Schmelter ◽  
Andrea Liebl ◽  
Nektarios Poullos ◽  
Volker Ruppert ◽  
Dierk Vorwerk

Vascular ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 295-296
Author(s):  
Alfried Germing ◽  
Michael Lindstaedt ◽  
Delawer Reber

This case report describes the surgical findings of a percutaneous closure device, which was used after diagnostic coronary angiography. The features of the device are described. Surgeons should be familiar with the existence of these devices to avoid complications during vascular access procedures at the level of the common femoral artery.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 560-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uri Rimon ◽  
Boris Khaitovich ◽  
Dmitry Yakubovich ◽  
Paul Bensaid ◽  
Gil Golan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document