scholarly journals Cast vs External Fixation: A Comparative Study in Elderly Osteoporotic Distal Radial Fracture Patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Moroni ◽  
F. Vannini ◽  
C. Faldini ◽  
F. Pegreffi ◽  
S. Giannini
2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Hegeman ◽  
J. Oskam ◽  
J. van der Palen ◽  
H. J. ten Duis ◽  
P. A. M. Vierhout

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-242
Author(s):  
Dr. Manish Teckchand Kanojiya ◽  
Dr. Manoj Jain ◽  
Dr. Ashutosh Dwivedi ◽  
Dr. Saurabh Vashishtha

2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. F. YOUNG ◽  
A. M. NANU ◽  
R. G. CHECKETTS

Eighty-five patients were reviewed 7 years after prospective randomization to bridging external fixation or plaster immobilization for treatment of a Colles’ type distal radial fracture. The Gartland and Werley score showed that most patients in each group had an excellent or good outcome and patient satisfaction was comparable and high in both groups. The fixator group had significantly less radial shortening ( P < 0.05 ). Despite a high level of radiographic malunion (50%) overall function, range of movement and activities of daily living were not limited. Twenty-five per cent of patients had minor radiological signs of post-traumatic arthritis although only one patient was symptomatic. We conclude that, in the long term, external fixation of distal radius fractures does not confer an improved outcome when compared to plaster immobilization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document