Technological Change, Relative Worker Productivity, and Firm-Level Substitution

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 478-496
Author(s):  
Grant Gannaway ◽  
Craig Palsson ◽  
Joseph Price ◽  
David Sims
2018 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 1827-1866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Cai ◽  
Nan Li

Abstract The majority of innovations are developed by multi-sector firms. The knowledge needed to invent new products is more easily adapted from some sectors than from others. We study this network of knowledge linkages between sectors and its impact on firm innovation and aggregate growth. We first document a set of sectoral-level and firm-level observations on knowledge applicability and firms’ multi-sector patenting behaviour. We then develop a general equilibrium model of firm innovation in which inter-sectoral knowledge linkages determine the set of sectors a firm chooses to innovate in and how much R&D to invest in each sector. It captures how firms evolve in the technology space, accounts for cross-sector differences in R&D intensity, and describes an aggregate model of technological change. The model matches new observations as demonstrated by simulation. It also yields new insights regarding the mechanism through which sectoral fixed costs of R&D affect growth.


2009 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 233-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Bellemare ◽  
Bruce Shearer

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 205316801882395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett Meyer ◽  
Thomas Biegert

Recent work in labor economics has shown that technological change has induced labor market polarization, an increase in demand for both high and low skill jobs, but declining demand for middle skill routine task jobs. We argue that labor market polarization should affect firms’ participation in collective agreements, but only in countries where laws automatically extending collective agreements to nonparticipating firms are weak. We develop an argument in which labor market polarization increases the distance between different skill groups of workers in both preferences for unionization and leverage to realize those preferences. Because of this, an increase in labor market polarization should be associated with a decline in collective bargaining coverage. We test our hypothesis about collective agreement extension and collective bargaining coverage in a cross-national sample of 21 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries from 1970 to 2010 and our hypothesis about labor market polarization in German firm-level and industry-level data from 1993–2007. We find a negative relationship in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development sample between technological change and collective bargaining coverage only in countries that make little or no use of extension procedures. We find that higher workforce skill polarization is associated with lower collective agreement participation in both German firm-level and industry-level samples.


2021 ◽  
pp. 105248
Author(s):  
Zheng Hou ◽  
Catarina Roseta-Palma ◽  
Joaquim José dos Santos Ramalho

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document