scholarly journals Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy of Early Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Clinical Observation and Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110647
Author(s):  
Jinling Dong ◽  
Ya Yang ◽  
Dan Han ◽  
Qian Zhao ◽  
Chengxin Liu ◽  
...  

Purpose: The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Methods: A total of 185 women with early breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery were retrospectively divided into hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost group and conventional fractionation group. Hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost included 104 patients and the dose of whole-breast radiation reached 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions and simultaneously tumor bed boost to 48 Gy in 16 fractions, which course of radiotherapy was 22 days. The 81 patients of the conventional fractionation group received whole breast radiation to 50 Gy in 25 fractions and followed by tumor bed boost to 10 Gy in 5 fractions, which course of radiotherapy was 40 days. Clinical information including patients’ characteristics, skin toxicity, myelosuppression, radiation pneumonia, and cosmetic effects was recorded to analyze the influence of age, chemotherapy, position, and breast volume on the results of radiotherapy. Results: Hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost group had no case of recurrence after a median follow-up of 25.6 months (9-47 months)) as compared with 2 after a median follow-up of 33.4 months (25-45 months) in the conventional fractionation group. The 2 groups had similar results in skin toxicity, cosmetic outcomes, and radiation pneumonia. In terms of myelosuppression, grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 of myelosuppression in the hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost group accounted for 16.7%, 12.3%, and 3.5% as compared with 30.0%, 21.1%, and 12.3% of the conventional fractionation group, respectively ( P = .000). Conclusions: HF-SIB RT is a considerable option in patients after breast-conserving surgery with a lower degree of myelosuppression and shorter treatment time.

Author(s):  
David Krug ◽  
René Baumann ◽  
Katja Krockenberger ◽  
Reinhard Vonthein ◽  
Andreas Schreiber ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose We report results of a multicenter prospective single-arm phase II trial (ARO-2013-04, NCT01948726) of moderately accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. Methods The eligibility criteria included unifocal breast cancer with an indication for adjuvant radiotherapy to the whole breast and boost radiotherapy to the tumor bed. The whole breast received a dose of 40 Gy and the tumor bed a total dose of 48 Gy in 16 fractions of 2.5 and 3 Gy, respectively. Radiotherapy could be given either as 3D conformal RT (3D-CRT) or as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The study was designed as a prospective single-arm trial to evaluate the acute toxicity of the treatment regimen. The study hypothesis was that the frequency of acute skin reaction grade ≥2 would be 20% or less. Results From November 2013 through July 2014, 149 patients were recruited from 12 participating centers. Six patients were excluded, leaving 143 patients for analysis. Eighty-four patients (58.7%) were treated with 3D-CRT and 59 (41.3%) with IMRT. Adherence to the treatment protocol was high. The rate of grade ≥2 skin toxicity was 14.7% (95% confidence interval 9.8–21.4%). The most frequent grade 3 toxicity (11%) was hot flashes. Conclusion This study demonstrated low toxicity of and high treatment adherence to hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy with SIB in a multicenter prospective trial, although the primary hypothesis was not met.


2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S197-S199
Author(s):  
C. Coles ◽  
J.S. Haviland ◽  
A.M. Kirby ◽  
I. Bhattacharya ◽  
A.M. Brunt ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1946-1952
Author(s):  
Chawalit Lertbutsayanukul ◽  
Manida Pitak ◽  
Natthagorn Ajchariyasongkram ◽  
Nichakon Rakkiet ◽  
Farinda Seuree ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 190 (7) ◽  
pp. 646-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Dellas ◽  
Reinhard Vonthein ◽  
Jörg Zimmer ◽  
Stefan Dinges ◽  
Alexander D. Boicev ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document