Activation of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis after Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with or without Endotracheal General Anesthesia

Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Yachi ◽  
Go Watanabe ◽  
Shigeyuki Tomita

Objective In this study, we measured the activity of coagulation and fibrinolysis and clarified the presence of certain differences between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) cases and awake off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (AOCAB) cases to evaluate whether AOCAB is actually safe from the viewpoint of coagulability. Methods 8 underwent OPCAB and 6 underwent AOCAB. The following factors inducing coagulation and fibrinolysis were measured for upto 5 days after the operation: platelet counts, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, fibrin degeneration products, D-dimer, thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), α2-plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex, prothrombin fragment 1, 2 (F1+2), thrombomodulin, β-thromboglobulin (β-TG), and platelet factor-4. Results At 5 days after the operation, fibrin degeneration products, D-dimer, α2–plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex, and F1 + 2 levels of the OPCAB group were significantly higher compared with their baseline values and those of the AOCAB group. At 5 days after the operation, thrombin-antithrombin III complex levels of the OPCAB group were significantly higher than those of the AOCAB group. Fibrinogen levels of the OPCAB group were significantly higher than their baseline values at 3 days after the operation (POD3) and 5 days after the operation (POD5). Conclusions In this study, the hypercoagulable state at POD5 was suggested in the patients in the OPCAB group, but not in those in the AOCAB group. Further study is necessary to confirm these results, and future studies would evaluate the potential benefit of AOCAB procedure from the viewpoint of perioperative coagulability.

2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hunaid A. Vohra ◽  
Norman P. Briffa

The beneficial effects of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass have been reported. However, whether preoperative insertion of IABP in high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has any beneficial effects remains to be established. We report our experience of preoperative insertion of IABP in OPCAB.


2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. E164-E169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruzheng Li ◽  
Atsushi Amano ◽  
Hiroyuki Miyagawa ◽  
Shizuyuki Dohi ◽  
Ichirou Hayashi ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahzad G. Raja ◽  
Kareem Salhiyyah ◽  
Manoraj Navaratnarajah ◽  
Muhammad Umar Rafiq ◽  
Jeremy Felderhof ◽  
...  

<p><b>Objectives:</b> Despite increasing recognition that off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and sequential grafting strategy individually are associated with improved outcomes, concerns persist regarding the safety and efficacy of combining these 2 techniques. We compared in-hospital and midterm outcomes for off-pump multivessel sequential and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> From September 1998 to September 2008, 689 consecutive patients received off-pump multivessel sequential coronary artery bypass grafting performed by a single surgeon. These patients were propensity matched to 689 patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting without sequential anastomoses. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected perioperative data was performed. In addition, medical notes and charts of all the study patients were reviewed. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.1 � 2.0 years.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The major in-hospital clinical outcomes in the sequential and control groups were found to be similar. After adjusting for clinical covariates, sequential grafting was not an independent predictor of in-hospital adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.50; <i>P</i> = .31), medium-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06-1.32; <i>P</i> = .92), and readmission to hospital (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.96-1.20; <i>P</i> = .80). Sequential grafting was an independent predictor of receiving more than 3 distal anastomoses (OR, 7.46; 95% CI, 4.27-11.45; <i>P</i> < .0001). Risk-adjusted survival was 89% for sequential grafting patients and 88% for conventional grafting patients (<i>P</i> = .96) during the medium-term follow-up.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our analysis confirms the short- and midterm safety and efficacy of off-pump sequential coronary artery bypass grafting.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document