scholarly journals Bimanual Grasping Adheres to Weber's Law

i-Perception ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 204166952110545
Author(s):  
Constanze Hesse ◽  
Róisín Elaine Harrison ◽  
Martin Giesel ◽  
Thomas Schenk

Weber's law states that our ability to detect changes in stimulus attributes decreases linearly with their magnitude. This principle holds true for many attributes across sensory modalities but appears to be violated in grasping. One explanation for the failure to observe Weber's law in grasping is that its effect is masked by biomechanical constraints of the hand. We tested this hypothesis using a bimanual task that eliminates biomechanical constraints. Participants either grasped differently sized boxes that were comfortably within their arm span (action task) or estimated their width (perceptual task). Within each task, there were two conditions: One where the hands’ start positions remained fixed for all object sizes (meaning the distance between the initial and final hand-positions varied with object size), and one in which the hands’ start positions adapted with object size (such that the distance between the initial and final hand-position remained constant). We observed adherence to Weber's law in bimanual estimation and grasping across both conditions. Our results conflict with a previous study that reported the absence of Weber's law in bimanual grasping. We discuss potential explanations for these divergent findings and encourage further research on whether Weber's law persists when biomechanical constraints are reduced.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2512
Author(s):  
Martin Giesel ◽  
Róisín Elaine Harrison ◽  
Thomas Schenk ◽  
Constanze Hesse

2017 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Manzone ◽  
Shirin Davarpanah Jazi ◽  
Robert L. Whitwell ◽  
Matthew Heath

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 452
Author(s):  
Tzvi Ganel ◽  
Gal Namdar

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzvi Ganel ◽  
Gal Namdar ◽  
Avigail Mirsky

Perception ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes M Zanker

The subjective strength of a percept often depends on the stimulus intensity in a nonlinear way. Such coding is often reflected by the observation that the just-noticeable difference between two stimulus intensities (JND) is proportional to the absolute stimulus intensity. This behaviour, which is usually referred to as Weber's Law, can be interpreted as a compressive nonlinearity extending the operating range of a sensory system. When the noise superimposed on a motion stimulus is increased along a logarithmic scale (in order to provide linear steps in subjective difference) in motion-coherency measurements, observers often report that the subjective differences between the various noise levels increase together with the absolute level. This observation could indicate a deviation from Weber's Law for variation of motion strength as obtained by changing the signal-to-noise ratio in random-dot kinematograms. Thus JNDs were measured for the superposition of uncorrelated random-dot patterns on static random-dot patterns and three types of motion stimuli realised as random-dot kinematograms, namely large-field and object ‘Fourier’ motion (all or a group of dots move coherently), ‘drift-balanced’ motion (a travelling region of static dots), and paradoxical ‘theta’ motion (the dots on the surface of an object move in opposite direction to the object itself). For all classes of stimuli, the JNDs when expressed as differences in signal-to-noise ratio turned out to increase with the signal-to-noise ratio, whereas the JNDs given as percentage of superimposed noise appear to be similar for all tested noise levels. Thus motion perception is in accordance with Weber's Law when the signal-to-noise ratio is regarded as stimulus intensity, which in turn appears to be coded in a nonlinear fashion. In general the Weber fractions are very large, indicating a poor differential sensitivity in signal-to-noise measurements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document