Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamic Relationship in Busulfan Conditioning Regimen: Results from a Large Pediatric Cohort Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 425-425
Author(s):  
Angelo Paci ◽  
Benedicte Neven ◽  
Vianney Poinsignon ◽  
Laura Faivre ◽  
Philippe Bourget ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Busulfan (Bu) is the corner stone of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) regimens with a narrow therapeutic window (TW). Graft rejection or toxicities are reported according to plasmatic exposure. In very young children, Bu exhibits large pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. Bu clearance was demonstrated to be non-linearly related to body weight (BW) and thus BW is used to optimally define the Bu dosage in children [Vassal et al., CCP 2006]. Search for additional data to confirm the TW and to describe clinical outcomes is still a topical question to better understand Pk/Pd relationship and to safely use Bu in young children and infants. Objective: To study the Pk/Pd relationship of Bu in pediatric recipients of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) receiving Bu-based conditioning regimens (CR). To correlate early toxicities (mainly hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), non infectious pulmonary disease (niPD) and outcome i.e. overall survival (OS) at last follow up with type of CR, the underlying diseases, age at transplantation and Pk of busulfan Patients and Method: This multicenter prospective observational study included 307 pts transplanted between 2006 and 2013 from 14 French Pediatric BMT units; median age at transplantation was 18.4 months [1.3-289], with a median BW of 11.3 kg [3.4-82]. 100 pts were younger than 1 year, 71 pts < 9 kg and 171 pts < 16 kg. Patients were mostly affected by non-malignant diseases (primary immune deficiency (n=143), inherited metabolic disorders (n=50), hemoglobinopathies (n=20) while 78 patients suffered from malignant disease. 257 patients received allogenic HSCT (genoidentical donor n=79, matched unrelated donor n=33, mismatch unrelated donor n=18, haploidentical intra-familial donor n=59, other mismatched intra familial donor n=8 or unrelated cord blood n=51) and 41 autologous BMT. All patients received Bu-based conditioning regimen in combination with cyclophosphamide (BuCy n=119), fludarabine (BuFlu n=88), melphalan (BuMel n=36) or thiotepa (BuTTP n=3). 40 patients received BuFlu associated with a second alkylating agent (Mel, TTP or Cy), 12 patients received BuCy associated with a third agent (Mel or VP16). Serotherapy was given in 70% of the patients. Starting doses of Bu were given according to the European SmPC or EBMT-ESID recommendations. The median posology was 1 mg/kg 4x/day for 4 days [0.6-1.3 mg/kg]. PK was assessed on plasma samples with area under the curve (AUC) evaluation from the 1st(D1), 9th (D9) and 13th (D13) dose in 150 patients, D1 and D9 in 40 patients, D1 and D13 in 46 patients while 62 patients were monitored on D1 only (684 PK datasets). PK analysis was performed using Non linear Mixed Effect Modelling. A one-compartment PK model suitably fitted the concentrations vs time data. Median follow up is 27 months (0.33 to 96 months post BMT). Results: At D1, 67% of patients were within the therapeutic window (TW) [900-1500 µM.min] and 66% of patients reached the cumulative TW [14400-24000 µM.min]. Incidence of VOD and niPD were respectively 35% and 14%. Both toxicities correlated with type of CR and age <1 year at transplantation. Incidence of aGVH was 33%. However, these incidences were very different according to the CR. BuFlu showed the lowest incidence compared to other combinations of drugs (p < 0.001 and =0.022 for VOD and niPD, respectively). When using a second alkylating agent, incidence of VOD reached 41% (vs 19% in BuFlu, p<0.001) and niPD 17% (vs 8% in BuFlu, p<0.040). Toxicities were also related to BW, with 48% vs 30% (p<0.013) for VOD below or above 9 kg, and respectively, 28% vs 9% (p<0.0002) for niPD. This tendency was also found with a 15 kg cut-off for aGVH. No correlation was found with Bu AUC. However, there was a trend for lower OS (HR 1.60 [1.00-2.58], p=0.051) in patients with AUC D1 <900 µM.min compared to patients with AUC D1 > 900 µM.min. OS was 69.1% at last follow up and was not significantly associated with CR and age at transplantation. Conclusion: In this large series of pediatric BMT recipients, we found that toxicities as VOD and niPD correlated with type of CR and age at transplantation in univariate analysis. Combination of 2 alkylating agents with Bu or BuFlu and transplantation < 1 year of age were associated with the highest incidence of toxicites. The TW targeting performance was improved in this cohort compared to previous reported data (Paci et al. TDM 2012). Specific TW for each group of pathologies will be proposed. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 473-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Ester Bernardo ◽  
Eugenia Piras ◽  
Adriana Vacca ◽  
Giovanna Giorgiani ◽  
Marco Zecca ◽  
...  

Abstract Sixty thalassemia patients (median age, 7 years; range, 1-37) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after a preparation combining thiotepa, treosulfan, and fludarabine. Before HSCT, 27 children were assigned to risk class 1 of the Pesaro classification, 17 to class 2, and 4 to class 3; 12 patients were adults. Twenty patients were transplanted from an HLA-identical sibling and 40 from an unrelated donor. The cumulative incidence of graft failure and transplantation-related mortality was 9% and 7%, respectively. Eight patients experienced grade II-IV acute GVHD, the cumulative incidence being 14%. Among 56 patients at risk, 1 developed limited chronic GVHD. With a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 4-72), the 5-year probability of survival and thalassemia-free survival are 93% and 84%, respectively. Neither the class of risk nor the donor used influenced outcome. This treosulfan-based preparation proved to be safe and effective for thalassemia patients given allogeneic HSCT.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 617-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Hugues Dalle ◽  
Luc Caty ◽  
Regis Peffault ◽  
Alexandra Salmon ◽  
Valerie Mialou ◽  
...  

Abstract Goal: Compare results after allogeneic HSCT for AML in CR1 in pediatric population after myeloablative conditioning regimen either based on TBI or busulfan. Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis from French registry including all consecutive patients under 18 years of age (n=131) from Dec’1979 and Oct’2004 transplanted for AML in CR1 with either sibling (n=104) or matched unrelated donor and given either multi-fractionated TBI 12Gy and cyclophosphamide 120mg/kg (TBI-Cy) or Busulfan 16mg/kg and Cyclophosphamide 200mg/kg (BuCy200). Results were analysed according to EBMT statistical analysis guidelines i.e. OS and EFS were analyzed by KM method and Log-rank test for comparison where TRM and relapse incidence were analyzed by cumulative incidence method and Gray test for comparison. Multivariate analyses were performed using proportional hazard model for the distribution of competitive risks defined by Fine and Gray. Results: 131 patients (female: 51.5%) were included. Median age at initial diagnosis was 11y (0.5 to 17.8). Median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 4.2 months. Eighty-three patients received BuCy200 and 48 patients were transplanted after TBI-Cy. Patient subgroups were comparable for age, gender, sex mismatch, source of graft (BMT vs PBSC), donor type (geno-identical vs 10/10 matched unrelated donor vs other), cytogenetical analysis and WBC at initial diagnosis, and for donor-recipient CMV status (−/+ vs others). Both 5 year-overall and event-free survival rates appeared significantly better in BuCy200 group than in TBI-Cy group with 73.3% vs 56.1% (p=0.02) and 67+/−7% vs 38+/−9% (p=0.002), respectively. TRM incidence at day 365 was dramatically better in BuCy200 group than in TBI-Cy group with 4,7% vs 26.1% of TRM rate (p=0.002), respectively. Even though there were no statistical significant differences for both acute and chronic GVHD cumulative incidences whatever given conditioning regimen, there was a trend for obtaining lesser GVHD in BuCy200 group: day 100 grade II-IV aGVHD cumulative incidence was 13% vs 37% and 2 year extensive cGVHD was 9 vs 19% for BuCy200 and TBI-Cy group, respectively. At 5 years, there was a trend for less relapse in BuCy200 group than in TBI-Cy 16+/−3% vs 32+/−6% (p=0.09), respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the superiority of BuCy200 on TBI-Cy conditioning regimen for paediatric patients presenting with AML in CR1 and undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from either matched related or unrelated donor. These results, obtained from a larger cohort, confirm and update those published by our group in 1994. Figure 1: Overall survival Figure 1:. Overall survival


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3309-3309
Author(s):  
Marie Robin ◽  
Raphael Porcher ◽  
Lionel Ades ◽  
Emmanuel Raffoux ◽  
Régis Peffault de Latour ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative treatment in MDS, and also in many cases of AML, 2 diseases where median age is higher than 50 years. Aim: Analyse the outcome of patients older than 50 years who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for MDS or AML, in Saint-Louis Hospital from January 1997 to December 2007. Method: 48 patients (pts) aged from 50 to 68 years (median: 56) received an HSCT for MDS (N=28) or AML (N=20) during this period. AML pts had intermediate (n=15) or high risk cytogenetics (n=3). 8 pts had failure to initial induction chemotherapy. FAB classification for MDS was: RAEB (n=8), RAEBt (n=6), secondary AML (n=2) or refractory anemia (n=2). Maximal IPSS score was high, intermediate-2 and intermediate-1 in 11, 14 and 4 pts. Ten pts with MDS received an “AML-like” chemotherapy and 5 received demethylating agents before transplant. 18 of the AML pts were in complete remission (CR) at time of transplant (CR1, n=15; CR2, n=3) and 2 were in relapse at time of HSCT. 10, 9 and 9 patients with MDS had < 5%, 5–10% and > 10% blasts in bone marrow at time of HSCT. Results: 19 patients with AML (95%) and 16 patients with MDS (57%) received a HSCT from an HLA-identical sibling donor. Other pts received a matched unrelated donor. Thirty-two pts, including 9/20 and 23/28 had at least one co-morbidity according to Sorror score. The conditioning regimen was myeloablative (MAC) in 14 pts (29%). Reduced intensity (RIC) was fludarabine based in 34 pts, associated with either 2 Gy TBI (n=25) or chemotherapy (n=9). All pts engrafted. 35 pts had acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD): grade I in 11, grade II in 18 and grade III in 6. GVHD incidence did not differ between pts who received a MAC or a RIC regimen. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 41% (95% CI: 26–57). OS and relapse-free-survival (RFS) were similar after MAC or RIC regimen (OS: 29% vs 35% and RFS: 29% vs 30%). Short-term non-relapse mortality (NRM) was lower in patients who received a RIC as compared to patients who received a MAC regimen but was similar at long-term (6-month NRM = 21% vs 9% and 12-month NRM = 21 vs 19 %). Patients with AML or MDS had similar OS and RFS (OS: 42 vs 41%; RFS: 37 vs 26% at 2 years for AML and MDS, respectively). NRM was not significantly higher in pts with MDS (26 vs 10% at one year) whereas relapse rate was not significantly higher in pts with AML (13 vs 6%). Conclusion: HSCT for AML or MDS after 50 years is a curative option for pts with related or unrelated HLA-identical donor regardless kind of conditioning regimen and co-morbidity at time of transplantation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 67-74
Author(s):  
V. V. Zakharova

Natural killer (NK) cells are the first population to recover after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Since the report in 2002 by L. Rugerri et al. showing the effectiveness of NK cell alloreactivity in haploidentical stem cell transplantation, a lot of conflicting studies have appeared about the role of NK alloreactivity in haploidentical and matched unrelated donor transplantations. Current studies demonstrate that the beneficial effects of donor NK alloreactivity are dependent on the transplant protocol – conditioning regimen, graft processing procedure and graft-versus-host disease.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3447-3447
Author(s):  
Regis Peffault De Latour ◽  
Matthieu Resche-Rigon ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
Johan Maertens ◽  
Patrice Ceballos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Nowadays acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients above the age of 60 years are often candidates for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT). However, little is known about the outcomes of HSCT in this particular population, due to the low number of HSCT with robust follow-up, the heterogeneity between centers, as well as reports usually mixing AML and other diseases such as myelodysplastic syndrome. We used the database of the Francophone society for stem cell transplantation and cellular therapy to address this question in a large cohort of patients in a recent time period. Patients and methods: 1167 consecutive patients aged ≥60 years with AML in complete remission (CR), transplanted between January 1st 2006 and January 1st 2016, reported to ProMISe (Project Manager Internet Server), an internet-based system shared by 36 Francophone transplantation centers, were reviewed. Classical post-HSCT endpoints were studied such as engraftment, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse rate, leukemia free survival (LFS) as well as overall survival (OS). Cytogenetic risk was assessed according to the European Leukemia Network 2017 for patients in first complete remission. Data were analyzed using proportional hazards models and proportional sub-distribution hazards models in presence of competing risks. Results: Patients' Characteristics are detailed in Table 1. The median age at HSCT was 62.9 years (Interquartile range -IQR 61.9-66.1). Patients aged ≥60 years but less of 65 represented 63.8% of the population with 68.2% of patients transplanted in the recent period (2011-2016). Most patient had de novo AML (91.6%), in first CR (76.9%) with intermediate risk (83.8%) according to ELN-2017 classification. A matched unrelated donor (MUD) was used in 45 % of transplants and the majority of patients received peripheral blood stem cells (83.7%). Half of the patients received fludarabine and 2 days busulfan as conditioning regimen. The majority of patients (70.9%) received anti-thymocyte globuline (ATG). Engraftment occurred in 1089 patients (93.3%; 95%CI, 91.9-94.8). Day 100 cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 24.6% (15.7% grade II; 5.8% grade III; 3% grade IV). At last follow up, 378 patients had developed chronic GVHD (severe in 37.2% of them; 95%CI, 34.0-40.3). With a median follow-up of 3.5 years (95%CI, 3.1-3.7 years), overall survival (OS) and LFS probabilities at 3 years were 50.7% (95%CI, 47.7-54.0) and 44.8% (95%CI, 41.8-48.1), respectively. In multivariable analysis, the only factor associated with worse OS was the use of a mismatched unrelated donor compare to MUD [Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.35 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.80), p=0.04]. At 3 years, relapse incidence was 34.4% (95% CI, 31.5-37.4). The use of a sibling donor compared to MUD [Sub-distribution Hazard Ratio (SHR): : 1.49 (95% CI, 1.19 to 1.87), p<0.001], poor risk AML in CR1 according to ELN classification [SHR: 1.49 (95% CI, 1.10 to 2.02), p=0.01], as well as the use of ATG in the conditioning regimen [SHR: 1.57 (95% CI, 1.21 to 2.05), p<0.001] were associated with a higher risk of relapse. During the study, 534 patients died (main causes of death was relapse, 53%); leading to a CI of NRM of 20.7% at 3 years (95%CI, 18.2-23.2). A karnofsky score above 90% [SHR: 0.74 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.98), p=0.04] and the use of a sibling donor compare to MUD [SHR : 0.43(95% CI, 0.30 to 0.63), p<0.001] were associated with reduced NRM. Conclusion: With more than 3 years follow-up, which is long enough for our results to be considered to be robust, the use of a mismatched unrelated donor was the only factor associated with worse overall survival in this population of AML patients aged of 60 years or more. Relapse appeared as the first cause of death, independently related to AML ELN poor risk classification, but also to the use of a sibling donor and of ATG in the conditioning regimen. This study highlights the major role of alloreactivity in this particular population, where modulation of T-cell alloreactivity as well as donor choice should be urgently addressed in well-designed prospective trials. Disclosures Peffault De Latour: Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Chalandon:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel costs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-91
Author(s):  
Jovana Kessler ◽  
Katarina Ivanović ◽  
Dejana Stanisavljević ◽  
Milena Todorović-Balint

Introduction: Opportunistic CMV reactivation is the most common viral complication after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Aim: The aim of our study is to evaluate the frequency of CMV reactivation in relation to the serostatus od the donor and the recipient, and the correlation with the day of leukocyte (Le) and thrombocyte (Tr) engraftment. We compared the frequency of CMV reactivation in myeloablative conditioning (MAC) versus reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), as well as in match related donor (MRD) versus match unrelated donor (MUD) allo-HSCT. We analyzed whether CMV reactivation affected the overall survival (OS) after allo-HSCT. Materials and methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we inspected 42 patients over the age of 18 years, who were treated at the Clinic for Hematology of the Clinical Center of Serbia, from December 2017 to November 2019. Results: Most CMV reactivations were noticed if the recipient (R) was seropositive, and the donor (D) was seronegative (R+/D= 60.0%). The number of CMV DNA copies corelated with the day of leukocyte engraftment of (p = 0.031), but not of thrombocyte engraftment (p = 0.598). The frequency of reactivation in patients treated with RIC was 25.0%, and it was 63.5%, if they were treated with MAC. The intensity of the conditioning regimen corelated with the number of CMV DNA copies (p = 0.025%). There was no correlation found between the type of transplantation (MRD or MUD) and CMV reactivation (p = 0.515). OS after allo-HSCT was 36.39 months (95% CI 26,0 - 46,78). The mean OS in patients with CMV reactivation was 7.39 months (95% CI 5,72 - 9,06), but we did not prove that CMV reactivation had an impact on OS (p = 0.527). Conclusion: CMV reactivation was most common in the R+/Dgroup. CMV reactivation did not affect OS after allo-HSCT in our group of patients.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5410-5410
Author(s):  
He Huang ◽  
Zhen Cai ◽  
Jimin Shi ◽  
Yi Luo ◽  
Maofang Lin

Abstract Unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (URD-HSCT) can potentially cure a variety of hematological malignancies. Until now, there were 140 cases of URD-HSCT in our bone marrow transplantation center, and we would retrospectively analyze the results of 128 patients received URD-HSCT between Nov. 1998 and May. 2006. The median age of all patients was 28 years (range 8–52 years), 27 patients with ALL in CR1, 28 patients with AML (26 in CR1 and 2 in CR2), 64 patients with CML (59 in CP, 1 in AP and 4 in BP), 8 patients with MDS, and 1 patient with MM. 113 patients were received Bu/Cy2 regimen as conditioning with busulfan 16mg/kg plus cyclophosphamide 120mg/kg, while other 5 patients with CML were received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen consisted of fludarabine (30mg/m2/d), busulfan (3.2mg/kg/d, i.v.) and ATG (5mg/kg/d). Graft with a median number of total nucleated cells was 3.45×108/kg (range 1.72–10.50×108/kg), including CD34+ cells 4.77×106/kg (range 0.72–9.92×106/kg) and CFU-GM 2.73×105/kg (range 1.46–7.91×105/kg). 110 patients were given MMF (0.5g/d), combined with CsA (3mg/kg/d) and short course MTX (10mg/m2/d) to prevent aGVHD. 18 patients received additional anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody 50mg/d on day 0, +4. Lipo protaglandin E1 was given to prevent SOS and CMV-PP65 antigen was monitored after the transplantation and ganciclovir was used to prevent CMV infection. Hemopoietic recovery was observed in 123 evaluable patients, and the median time to achieve ANC>0.5×109/L was 17 days (range 12–31 days), platelets >20×109/L was 24 days (range 8–140 days). aGVHD developed in 69 (56.10%) patients; aGVHD of grade I-II were observed in 53 (43.09%) patients and the severe aGVHD of grade III-IV were observed in 16 (13.01%) patients. cGVHD developed in 53 (46.49%) patients with 46 (40.35%) limited and 7 (6.14%) extensive. In group (n=110) which received MMF combined with CsA and MTX as aGVHD prophylaxis, aGVHD were observed in 60 (54.55%) patients with grade I-II 42.73% and grade III-IV 11.82%. While in group (n=18) which received additional anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody, aGVHD were observed in 7 (46.7%) patients with grade I-II 6 (33.3%) and grade III-IV 3 (16.67%). There was no significant difference between two regimen of aGVHD prophylaxis. Early TRM of all patients was 10.94% at 100 days after transplant. After a median follow-up of 13.2 months (range 1.3–92 months), clinical relapse were detected in 8 patients. By Kaplan-Meier method, the accumulative probability of 5-year overall survival of all patients was 60.98±4.52%, and which of ALL, AML, CML, MDS were 68.65±9.21%, 61.61±9.74%, 56.95±6.50% and 75.00±15.31%, respectively. 4 of 5 patients received reduced intensity URD-HSCT with follow-up of 7.3 months (range 3.0–10.3 months) experienced successful engraftment, and no aGVHD developed while cGVHD occurred in 2 cases, all patients achieved disease free survival. To further examined the impact of HLA matching on GVHD and survival, we compared the outcomes of the HLA-matched group (n=82) and HLA 1–2 alleles disparity mismatched group (n=46). aGVHD were observed in 38 (46.34%) patients in HLA-matched group and 31 (67.39%) patients in HLA-mismatched group (P<0.05), respectively. The survival of HLA-matched and HLA-mismatched group were 69.14% and 52.17% (P<0.05) respectively. URD-HSCT could be one of choice in patients with ALL, AML, CML, MDS, and HLA class I and class II matching would be associated with the outcomes of URD-HSCT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document