scholarly journals Anterolateral approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy versus standard medial approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: does it matter?

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T Hirschmann ◽  
Mathias Hoffmann ◽  
Robert Krause ◽  
Reza-Amir Jenabzadeh ◽  
Markus P Arnold ◽  
...  
The Knee ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 439-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sérgio Rocha Piedade ◽  
Alban Pinaroli ◽  
Elvire Servien ◽  
Philippe Neyret

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 5400-5413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Wang ◽  
Dan Xing ◽  
Jiao Jiao Li ◽  
Yuanyuan Zhu ◽  
Shengjie Dong ◽  
...  

Objective To identify whether the medial or lateral approach is superior for patients with valgus knees undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Studies evaluating the 2 approaches were sourced from the PUBMED, EMBASE, Web of Science, and OVID databases. The quality of included studies was assessed using a modified quality evaluation method, and differences between approaches were systematically reviewed. Results Seventeen observational studies were included. The studies were published between 1991 and 2016, and included 5 retrospective studies and 12 prospective studies. Sixteen evaluation methods for the study outcomes were identified. Twelve and eight complication types were identified by studies reporting the lateral and medial approaches for valgus knee, respectively. Several studies showed that pain scores and knee function were superior using a lateral approach. Conclusion The lateral approach (combined with a tibial tubercle osteotomy or proximal quadriceps snip) was more useful and safer than the medial approach in the treatment of severe uncorrectable valgus knee deformity in patients undergoing TKA. Most of the available evidence supports the use of a lateral approach provided that the surgeon is familiar with the pathological anatomy of the valgus knee.


Joints ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 095-099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Biggi ◽  
Stefano Divano ◽  
Riccardo Tedino ◽  
Andrea Capuzzo ◽  
Stefano Tornago ◽  
...  

Purpose Difficult primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and revision TKA may be high demanding, especially during joint exposure. Aim of this article is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of patients, who underwent TKA and revision TKA, where tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) was performed. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 79 consecutives TKAs where TTO was performed. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at their last follow-up (mean, 7.4 ± 3.7 years). Clinical evaluation included the Knee Society Score (KSS), the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and range of motion. Radiological assessment included the evaluation of radiolucent lines, osteolysis, cortical bone hypertrophy, time of bone healing of the TTO fragment, and the hardware complication. Results KSS raised from 40.7 ± 3.1 to 75 ± 4.3 (p < 0.0001). Knee flexion increased from 78.7 ± 9.9° to 95.0 ± 9.5° (p < 0.0001), and VAS improved from 7.9 ± 0.9 to 3.8 ± 1 (p < 0.0001). No signs of loosening or evolutive radiolucency lines were found. Osteolytic areas around the stem were detected. No significant association was found between the implant design and the outcomes, while aseptic loosening showed significantly better results. Complications were: 4 painful hardware, 3 late periprosthetic infections, 1 extension lag of 5°, and 3 flexion lag. Conclusion Our experience suggests the use of TTO to improve the surgical approach in difficult primary TKA or revision TKA. A precise surgical technique leads to good results with low risk of complications. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-12
Author(s):  
Andrea Baldini ◽  
Pier Francesco Indelli ◽  
PT Luca Manfredini ◽  
Massimiliano Marcucci

ABSTRACT Purpose We hypothesized that the anterior tibial surface curvature is a more reliable landmark for correct tibial component rotational positioning in TKA respect to the ‘Akagi’ line and the medial third of the tibial tubercle. Methods Three independent investigators reviewed 124 knee MRI scans, identifying independently the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA), the femoral posterior condylar axis (PCA), a line connecting the middle of the posterior cruciate ligament and the medial edge of the patellar tendon attachment (Akagi's line), the medial third of the tibial tubercle and the anterior tibial surface curvature. The most appropriate tibial baseplate tracing for the NexGen Total Knee System (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA) was superimposed matching the anterior tibial cortex with its anterior surface. At this point, the rotation of the tibial plate tracing was calculated in respect to the TEA, the medial third of the tibial tubercle line, the Akagi's line and the PCA. Customized software was created and used for analysis of the MRI datasets. Results: The investigators agreed on the localization of the Akagi's line in 64% of the cases within 3° and in 85% of the cases within 5° (minimum –16°, maximum –7°): this landmark might lead to internal rotation of the tibial component. The observers agreed on the localization of the medial third of the tibial tubercle in 29% of the cases within 3° and, in 70% of the cases, within 5° (minimum –4°, maximum +4°): this landmark might lead to external rotation of the tibial component. The investigators agreed on the localization of the anterior tibial surface curvature in 89% of the cases within 3° and in 99% of the cases within 5° (minimum –1°, maximum +4°): component alignment along the anterior cortex guaranteed full matching ±3° to the epicondylar axis in 75% of the knees. Conclusion Alignment of the tibial component, when based on the anterior tibial surface, was more reliable and easier identifiable than either the Akagi's line or the medial third of the tibial tubercle. Level of evidence Level 3 (Retrospective cohort study). Indelli PF, Baldini A, Manfredini L, Marcucci M. Rotational Alignment Landmarks in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Duke Orthop J 2014;4(1):8-12.


2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 2485-2490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Wishart ◽  
Markus P. Arnold ◽  
Rolf W. Huegli ◽  
Felix Amsler ◽  
Niklaus F. Friederich ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document