scholarly journals A new therapy (MP29-02*) effectively targets the entire seasonal allergic rhinitis symptom complex

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Price ◽  
Jean Bousquet ◽  
Claus Bachert ◽  
Wytske Fokkens ◽  
Glenis Scadding ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-211
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Tani-Ishii ◽  
Koichiro Muromachi ◽  
Noriko Mutoh ◽  
Jiro Suzuki ◽  
Kaori Shimojima ◽  
...  

Allergy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. North ◽  
M. J. Jones ◽  
J. L. MacIsaac ◽  
A. M. Morin ◽  
L. M. Steacy ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 705 ◽  
pp. 135147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy D. Silver ◽  
Kymble Spriggs ◽  
Simon Haberle ◽  
Constance H. Katelaris ◽  
Edward J. Newbigin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 720 ◽  
pp. 137351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy D. Silver ◽  
Kymble Spriggs ◽  
Simon G. Haberle ◽  
Constance H. Katelaris ◽  
Edward J. Newbigin ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 382-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
William W. Storms ◽  
Jay Grossman ◽  
David S. Pearlman ◽  
Philip C. Halverson ◽  
Paul Chervinsky ◽  
...  

Azelastine is a novel antiallergy medication currently under investigation for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma. Pharmacologic studies in laboratory animals and in vitro model systems indicate that azelastine exerts multiple actions including modulation of airways smooth muscle response, interference with inflammatory processes, and inhibition of allergic reactions. In a previous controlled clinical trial, azelastine nasal solution (ASTELIN N.S.™) demonstrated effectiveness in controlling symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). The objective of this 2-week double-blind, parallel-group study was to further assess the effectiveness of azelastine nasal solution in improving allergic rhinitis symptoms. Two hundred forty-seven patients (≥12 years) with symptomatic SAR who satisfied a minimum symptoms score during a 1-week, single-blind, baseline evaluation period were randomized to receive azelastine 2 sprays per nostril bid, azelastine 2 sprays per nostril qd, chlorpheniramine 12 mg bid, or placebo using a double-dummy technique to insure blinding. The primary efficacy variables were changes in Major Symptom Complex (nose blows, sneezes, runny nose/sniffles, itch nose, and watery eyes) and Total Symptom Complex (Major plus itchy eyes/ears/throat/palate, cough, and postnasal drip) severity scores. Patients treated with azelastine nasal solution qd and bid had mean percent improvements in the Total and Major Symptom Complex severity scores that were clinically significant (≥50% improvement over placebo) after both weeks, at endpoint, and overall. The improvements for the azelastine bid group were statistically significant (P≤.05) at all evaluation points. Adverse experiences occurred infrequently, and none was considered serious or potentially limiting to the clinical utility of the nasal solution. The favorable safety profile of azelastine nasal solution together with its rapid onset and prolonged duration of action in relieving rhinitis symptoms and advantages over currently marketed topical treatments make it a good choice for treatment of SAR. The results of this trial demonstrate that azelastine nasal solution provides an alternative to oral medication in the treatment of SAR.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenis Scadding ◽  
David Price ◽  
Jean Bousquet ◽  
Peter Hellings ◽  
Wytske Fokkens ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hellings ◽  
Claus Bachert ◽  
Jean Bousquet ◽  
Glenis Scadding ◽  
Wytske Fokkens ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document