scholarly journals Carbon ion reirradiation compared to intensity-modulated re-radiotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer (CARE): a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Held ◽  
Kristin Lang ◽  
Sebastian Regnery ◽  
Katharina Weusthof ◽  
Adriane Hommertgen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intensity-modulated re-radiotherapy (reIMRT) has been established as a standard local treatment option in patients with non-resectable, recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC). However, the clinical outcome is unfavorable and severe toxicities (≥grade III) occurred in 30–40% of patients. The primary aim of the current trial is to investigate carbon ion reirradiation (reCIRT) compared to reIMRT in patients with rHNC regarding safety/toxicity as well as local control, overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL). Methods The present trial will be performed as a single center, two-armed, prospective phase II study. A maximum of 72 patients will be treated with either reIMRT or reCIRT to evaluate severe (≥grade III) treatment-related toxicities (randomization ratio 1:1). The primary target value is to generate less than 35% acute/subacute severe toxicity (≥grade III), according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, within 6 months after study treatment. The total dose of reirradiation will range between 51 and 60 Gy or Gy (RBE), depending primarily on the radiotherapy interval and the cumulative dose to organs at risk. Individual dose prescription will be at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist. The local and distant progression-free survival 12 months after reirradiation, the OS, and the QoL are the secondary endpoints of the trial. Explorative trial objectives are the longitudinal investigation of clinical patient-related parameters, tumor parameters on radiological imaging, and blood-based tumor analytics. Discussion Recent retrospective studies suggested that reCIRT could represent a feasible and effective treatment modality for rHNC. This current randomized prospective trial is the first to investigate the toxicity and clinical outcome of reCIRT compared to reIMRT in patients with rHNC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04185974; December 4th 2019.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Held ◽  
Kristin Lang ◽  
Sebastian Regnery ◽  
Katharina Weusthof ◽  
Adriane Hommertgen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intensity-modulated re-radiotherapy (reIMRT) has been established as a standard local treatment option in patients with non-resectable, recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC). However, the clinical outcome is unfavorable and severe toxicities (≥ grade III) occurred in 30–40% of patients. The primary aim of the current trial is to investigate carbon ion reirradiation (reCIRT) compared to reIMRT in patients with rHNC regarding safety/toxicity as well as local control, overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL). Methods The present trial will be performed as a single center, two-armed, prospective phase II study. A maximum of 72 patients will be treated with either reIMRT or reCIRT to evaluate severe (≥ grade III) treatment-related toxicities (randomization ratio 1:1). The primary target value is to generate less than 35% acute/subacute severe toxicity (≥ grade III), according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, within 6 months after study treatment. The total dose of reirradiation will range between 51–60 Gy or Gy (RBE), depending primarily on the radiotherapy interval and the cumulative dose to organs at risk. Individual dose prescription will be at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist. The local and distant progression-free survival 12 months after reirradiation, the OS, and the QoL are the secondary endpoints of the trial. Explorative trial objectives are the longitudinal investigation of clinical patient-related parameters, tumor parameters on radiological imaging, and blood-based tumor analytics. Discussion Recent retrospective studies suggested that reCIRT could represent a feasible and effective treatment modality for rHNC. This current randomized prospective trial is the first to investigate the toxicity and clinical outcome of reCIRT compared to reIMRT in patients with rHNC. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04185974; December 4th 2019; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04185974.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Held ◽  
Kristin Lang ◽  
Sebastian Regnery ◽  
Katharina Weusthof ◽  
Adriane Hommertgen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Intensity-modulated re-radiotherapy (reIMRT) has been established as a standard local treatment option in patients with non-resectable, recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC). However, the clinical outcome is unfavorable and severe toxicities (≥grade III) occurred in 30–40% of patients. The primary aim of the current trial is to investigate carbon ion reirradiation (reCIRT) compared to reIMRT in patients with rHNC regarding safety/toxicity as well as local control, overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL). Methods: The present trial will be performed as a single center, two-armed, prospective phase II study. A maximum of 72 patients will be treated with either reIMRT or reCIRT to evaluate severe (≥grade III) treatment-related toxicities (randomization ratio 1:1). The primary target value is to generate less than 35% acute/subacute severe toxicity (≥grade III), according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, within 6 months after study treatment. The total dose of reirradiation will range between 51–60 Gy or Gy (RBE), depending primarily on the radiotherapy interval and the cumulative dose to organs at risk. Individual dose prescription will be at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist. The local and distant progression-free survival 12 months after reirradiation, the OS, and the QoL are the secondary endpoints of the trial. Explorative trial objectives are the longitudinal investigation of clinical patient-related parameters, tumor parameters on radiological imaging, and blood-based tumor analytics.Discussion: Recent retrospective studies suggested that reCIRT could represent a feasible and effective treatment modality for rHNC. This current randomized prospective trial is the first to investigate the toxicity and clinical outcome of reCIRT compared to reIMRT in patients with rHNC.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04185974; December 4th 2019; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04185974.


2013 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. S27-S28
Author(s):  
F. Duprez ◽  
I. Madani ◽  
D. Berwouts ◽  
K. Bonte ◽  
T. Boterberg ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-jen Chen ◽  
Jeffrey V Kuo ◽  
Nilam S Ramsinghani ◽  
Muthana S.A.L Al-Ghazi

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin-Cheng Chen ◽  
Chen-Chiao Lee ◽  
Dennis Mah ◽  
Rajiv Sharma ◽  
Evan Landau ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 803-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Held ◽  
Paul Windisch ◽  
Sati Akbaba ◽  
Kristin Lang ◽  
Rami El Shafie ◽  
...  

Head & Neck ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1695-1702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Zwicker ◽  
Falk Roeder ◽  
Henrik Hauswald ◽  
Christian Thieke ◽  
Carmen Timke ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document