scholarly journals Outcomes of selective nonoperative management of civilian abdominal gunshot wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aziza N. Al Rawahi ◽  
Fatma A. Al Hinai ◽  
Jamie M. Boyd ◽  
Christopher J. Doig ◽  
Chad G. Ball ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 234 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
George C. Velmahos ◽  
Demetrios Demetriades ◽  
Konstantinos G. Toutouzas ◽  
Grant Sarkisyan ◽  
Linda S. Chan ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 261 (4) ◽  
pp. 760-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradeep H. Navsaria ◽  
Andrew J. Nicol ◽  
Sorin Edu ◽  
Rajiv Gandhi ◽  
Chad G. Ball

2017 ◽  
Vol 213 (3) ◽  
pp. 583-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin L. Reed ◽  
Nimitt J. Patel ◽  
Amy A. McDonald ◽  
William C. Baughman ◽  
Jeffrey A. Claridge ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110308
Author(s):  
Andrew Platt ◽  
Mostafa H. El Dafrawy ◽  
Michael J. Lee ◽  
Martin H. Herman ◽  
Edwin Ramos

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objectives: Indications for surgical decompression of gunshot wounds to the lumbosacral spine are controversial and based on limited data. Methods: A systematic review of literature was conducted to identify studies that directly compare neurologic outcomes following operative and non-operative management of gunshot wounds to the lumbosacral spine. Studies were evaluated for degree of neurologic improvement, complications, and antibiotic usage. An odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated for dichotomous outcomes which were then pooled by random-effects model meta-analysis. Results: Five studies were included that met inclusion criteria. The total rate of neurologic improvement was 72.3% following surgical intervention and 61.7% following non-operative intervention. A random-effects model meta-analysis was carried out which failed to show a statistically significant difference in the rate of neurologic improvement between surgical and non-operative intervention (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.45, 2.53; P = 0.88). In civilian only studies, a random-effects model meta-analysis failed to show a statistically significant difference in the rate of neurologic improvement between surgical and non-operative intervention (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.21, 2.72; P = 0.66). Meta-analysis further failed to show a statistically significant difference in the rate of neurologic improvement between patients with either complete (OR 4.13; 95% CI 0.55, 30.80; P = 0.17) or incomplete (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.10, 1.52; P = 0.17) neurologic injuries who underwent surgical and non-operative intervention. There were no significant differences in the number of infections and other complications between patients who underwent surgical and non-operative intervention. Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of neurologic improvement between those who underwent surgical or non-operative intervention. Further research is necessary to determine if surgical intervention for gunshot wounds to the lumbosacral spine, including in the case of retained bullet within the spinal canal, is efficacious.


2012 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 884-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
Bernardino Castelo Branco ◽  
Donald Moe ◽  
Galinos Barmparas ◽  
Obi Okoye ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Chen ◽  
Sean T. Campbell ◽  
Andrea K. Finlay ◽  
Andrew D. Duckworth ◽  
Julius A. Bishop ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 579-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric C. Umbreit ◽  
Jonathan C. Routh ◽  
Douglas A. Husmann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document