scholarly journals The influence of the European paediatric regulation on marketing authorisation of orphan drugs for children

Author(s):  
Annemarie Rosan Kreeftmeijer-Vegter ◽  
Anthonius de Boer ◽  
Roselinda H van der Vlugt-Meijer ◽  
Peter J de Vries
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maddalena Toma ◽  
Mariagrazia Felisi ◽  
Donato Bonifazi ◽  
Fedele Bonifazi ◽  
Viviana Giannuzzi ◽  
...  

Objectives: In this paper, we investigated the effects of the European Paediatric Regulation (EC) N° 1901/2006 with respect to satisfying the paediatric therapeutic needs, assessed in terms of the increased number of paediatric medicinal products, new therapeutic indications in specific high-need conditions (neonates, oncology, rare disease, etc.) and increased number of paediatric clinical studies supporting the marketing authorisation.Methods: We analysed the paediatric medicinal products approved by the European Medicines Agency in the period January 2007-December 2019, by collecting the following data: year of approval, active substance, legal basis for the marketing authorisation, type of medicinal product (i.e., chemical, biological, or ATMP), orphan drug status, paediatric indication, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code (first-level), number and type of paediatric studies. Data were compared with similar data collected in the period 1996–2006.Results: In the period January 1996–December 2019, in a total of 1,190 medicinal products and 843 active substances, 34 and 38%, respectively, were paediatric. In the two periods, before and after the Paediatric Regulation implementation, the paediatric/total medicinal products ratio was constant while the paediatric/total active substances ratio decreased. Moreover, excluding generics and biosimilars, a total of 106 and 175 paediatric medicines were granted a new paediatric indication, dosage or age group in the two periods; out of 175, 128 paediatric medicines had an approved Paediatric Investigational Plan. The remaining 47 were approved without an approved Paediatric Investigational Plan, following the provisions of Directive 2001/83/EC and repurposing an off-patent drug. The analysis of the clinical studies revealed that drugs with a Paediatric Investigational Plan were supported by 3.5 studies/drug while drugs without a Paediatric Investigational Plan were supported by only 1.6 studies/drug.Discussion: This report confirms that the expectations of the European Paediatric Regulation (EC) N° 1901/2006 have been mainly satisfied. However, the reasons for the limited development of paediatric medicines in Europe, should be further discussed, taking advantage of recent initiatives in the regulatory field, such as the Action Plan on Paediatrics, and the open consultation on EU Pharmaceutical Strategy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 99 (10) ◽  
pp. 1446-1446
Author(s):  
P Baiardi ◽  
A Ceci ◽  
L Cantarutti ◽  
S Girotto ◽  
M Sturkenboom ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew DJ Pearson ◽  
Delphine Heenen ◽  
Pamela R Kearns ◽  
Anne Goeres ◽  
Lynley V Marshall ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 105-124
Author(s):  
Antje Haas ◽  
Thomas Mayer ◽  
Anja Tebinka-Olbrich ◽  
Maximilian Blindzellner ◽  
Elisa Beggerow ◽  
...  

Zusammenfassung Zusammenfassung Beschleunigte Zulassungen stellen die Nutzenbewertung und Erstattung von Arzneimitteln vor besondere Herausforderungen. Der Artikel setzt sich in Form eines narrativen Reviews mit den Auswirkungen dieser Zulassungen auf Patient:innen, Angehörige der Gesundheitsberufe und die Solidargemeinschaft sowie mit den möglichen Lösungsstrategien auseinander. Die Autor:innen geben dazu anhand aktueller Literatur zunächst einen Überblick über die Zulassung von Arzneimitteln mit „conditional marketing authorisation“, „approval under exceptional circumstances“ sowie Orphan Drugs. Anschließend stellen sie den Einfluss beschleunigter Zulassungen auf die Nutzenbewertung dar und bewerten diesen. Zum Schluss beschreiben sie in diesem Zusammenhang Herausforderungen im Hinblick auf Arzneimittelpreise.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S491
Author(s):  
I. Odnoletkova ◽  
Z. Marjenberg ◽  
N. Pooley ◽  
S. Langham

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Huppke ◽  
M Blüthner ◽  
O Bauer ◽  
W Stark ◽  
K Reinhardt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document