Efficacy and safety results from CurrentS, a double-blind, randomized, phase III study of second-line erlotinib (150 mg versus 300 mg) in current smokers with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Purpose A phase III study to determine whether a weekly docetaxel schedule improves the therapeutic index compared with the classic 3-weekly schedule. Patients and Methods Patients with stage IIIB-IV non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (3-weekly) and 35 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 (weekly) for ≤ eight cycles. End points included survival (primary), toxicity, and response. Results Of 215 patients enrolled, 208 (103 in the 3-weekly arm and 105 in the weekly arm) were assessable for response. At baseline, 24.5% of patients (51 out of 208) had received prior paclitaxel therapy and 43.3% of patients (90 out of 208) had been progression-free for more than 3 months after first-line therapy. After 12 months' follow-up, median survival was 6.3 months (95% CI, 4.68 to 7.84 months) with 3-weekly docetaxel and 9.2 months (95% CI, 5.83 to 12.59 months) with weekly docetaxel (P = .07) after a median of four (range, one to eight) and two (range, one to eight) treatment cycles, respectively. Overall, response rates were 12.6% v 10.5% with 3-weekly versus weekly docetaxel. Significantly fewer patients reported grade 3 to 4 toxicities with weekly docetaxel versus 3-weekly docetaxel (P ≤ .05). There were significantly lower rates of grade 3 to 4 anemia (P ≤ .05), leucopenia (P < .0001), and neutropenia (P ≤ .001) with weekly versus 3-weekly treatment. No grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia or mucositis was reported. Conclusion Weekly docetaxel 35 mg/m2 demonstrated similar efficacy and better tolerability than standard 3-weekly docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and can be recommended as a feasible alternative second-line treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Download Full-text

Vandetanib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A randomized, double-blind phase III trial (ZODIAC)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.18s.cra8003 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (18S) ◽

pp. CRA8003-CRA8003 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

R. S. Herbst ◽

Y. Sun ◽

S. Korfee ◽

P. Germonpré ◽

N. Saijo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Small Cell ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Double Blind ◽

Phase Iii Trial

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar FKB238 versus originator bevacizumab: Results from a phase III trial in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e21728 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e21728-e21728

Author(s):

Konstantinos N. Syrigos ◽

Dongyue Fu ◽

Stephanie Jones ◽

Zahid Bashir ◽

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Clinical Trial ◽

Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Objective Response ◽

Small Cell ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Double Blind

e21728 Background: Bevacizumab (bev) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that binds selectively to VEGF-A and prevents it from interacting with its receptors, thereby inhibiting formation of new tumor vasculature to block tumor growth. FKB238, a bev biosimilar, has similar pharmacokinetic and safety profiles to originator bev (o-bev). This phase 3 trial (NCT02810457) compared the efficacy and safety of FKB238 with o-bev in patients with advanced/recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). Methods: This global, multicenter, double-blind, parallel, randomized, comparative clinical trial enrolled and randomized 731 patients with advanced/recurrent NS-NSCLC to receive 15 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion of either FKB238 (N = 364) or o-bev (N = 367). All patients received IV infusions of paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 6.0) immediately prior to investigational drugs for 4-6 cycles. FKB238 and o-bev were administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle until objective progressive disease or other discontinuation criteria were met. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) based on blinded independent central review assessment for the intent-to-treat population was 51.6% and 53.7% for patients in the FKB238 and o-bev arms, respectively. The FKB238/o-bev ORR ratio was 0.96 (90% CI: 0.86 to 1.08) and the 90% CI fell within the pre-specified equivalence margin. The estimated proportion of patients alive and progression free at 12 months was 25.0% in the FKB238 arm vs 25.3% in the o-bev arm (HR of 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.16). The estimated median progression-free survival was 7.72 months in the FKB238 arm and 7.62 months in the o-bev arm. TEAEs were reported for 94.2% (FKB238) and 95.1% (o-bev) of patients. TEAEs ≥ grade 3 were reported for 53.6% (FKB238) and 55.5% (o-bev) of patients. SAEs were reported for 25.1% and 26.0% of patients treated with FKB238 and o-bev, respectively. Conclusions: There were no meaningful differences in efficacy and safety between FKB238 or o-bev in patients with NS-NSCLC. ORR efficacy equivalence was demonstrated, and the safety profiles of both drugs were similar. Clinical trial information: NCT02810457.

Download Full-text