scholarly journals Usage of Oregon’s Death With Dignity Act (DWDA).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 44-44
Author(s):  
Charles David Blanke ◽  
Michael Leo LeBlanc ◽  
Dawn L. Hershman ◽  
Lee M. Ellis ◽  
Frank L. Meyskens

44 Background: In 1997, OR enacted a voter initiative allowing terminally ill residents to self-administer physician-prescribed medication to end their lives. Statute requires prescriptions written for lethal medications be reported; the state also collects demographic and intended use data. We wished to to evaluate and report participation trends. Methods: OR's Public Health Division gathers compliance forms from prescribing/consulting physicians, pharmacists, and psychiatrists, prescribing physician follow-up forms, and death certificates. Data from 1998-early 2016 were reviewed, collated, and interpreted. Results: 1,545 prescriptions were written; 991 pts died from legally-prescribed lethal medication. The % of prescription recipients dying from drug use per yr ranged from 48-82, with no significant trend (logistic regression 2-sided p = .90) The prescribing rate increased 12%/yr on average through 2013, with a 28% increase in 2014 and 40% in 2015, not explainable by growth in population. Characteristics of 991 pts dying from drug: Most recipients had cancer (77%); 8% had ALS, 4.5% lung disease, 2.6% heart disease, and 0.9% HIV. 5.3% were sent for psychiatric evaluation. M/F (%) 51.4/48.6; median age (years) 71 (range 25-102); race white/black/asian/hispanic (%) 97/0.1/1.3/1; hospice Y/N (%) 90.5/9/5. 94% died at home. Estimated median time between intake and coma (min): 5 (range 1-38); to death (min): 25 (range 1-6240). 3.3% had known complications. Reasons for DWD (%): ADL not enjoyable 90; loss of autonomy 92, dignity 79, or bodily functions 48; inadequate pain control 25; financial 3. Conclusions: The number of prescriptions written for ORDWDA medications increased annually since enactment. The % of recipients self-administering drugs has varied. Very few pts are referred for psychiatric consultation prior to DWD. Most pts dying from lethal medications have cancer, and the overwhelming majority expire at home. Medications used are effective and rapidly acting. Little evidence exists disadvantaged pts are disproportionally using DWD. Pts use DWD for reasons related to QOL, autonomy, and dignity, and relatively rarely because of inadequate pain palliation. Future studies should evaluate why many pts prescribed lethal drugs choose not to take them.

2000 ◽  
Vol 342 (8) ◽  
pp. 557-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Ganzini ◽  
Heidi D. Nelson ◽  
Terri A. Schmidt ◽  
Dale F. Kraemer ◽  
Molly A. Delorit ◽  
...  

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah K. Sperling

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Jablonski ◽  
Janine Clymin ◽  
Dana Jacobson ◽  
Karen Feldt

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Hannig

In 2017, Oregon marked the twentieth anniversary of enacting the Death with Dignity Act, allowing terminally ill, mentally competent adult patients to end their life by ingesting a lethal medication prescribed by their physician. In U.S. public discourse, medical aid-in-dying is frequently equated with the terminology and morality of suicide, much to the frustration of those who use and administer the law. This article reflects on the stakes of maintaining a distinction between a medically assisted death and the most common cultural category for self-inflicted death—suicide. It uncovers the complicated dialectic between authorship and authorization that characterizes medical assistance in dying and attendant moralities of purposive death, speaking to broader disciplinary concerns in the cultural study of death and medicine. By stressing the primacy of debilitating, life-limiting illness in an aided death and by submitting such a death to the rationale and management of institutionalized medicine, advocates carve out a form of intentional death that occupies a category of its own. The diffusion of agency onto a patient’s fatal illness, medicine, and the state—both discursively and in practice—enhances the moral and social acceptability of an assisted death, which becomes an authorized form of dying that looks very different from the socially deviant act of suicide.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document